REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   AC flight near-missed the 'greatest aviation disaster in history' (https://www.revscene.net/forums/712878-ac-flight-near-missed-greatest-aviation-disaster-history.html)

twitchyzero 07-15-2017 01:28 AM

AC flight near-missed the 'greatest aviation disaster in history'
 
so news from last week

but the NTSB report released yesterday suggested this could've been far worse than Tenerife in '77.

weather cond'ns were fine too FailFish

to add insult to the injury, the passengers were only told "busy traffic" after they disembarked WutFace

http://www.cbc.ca/polopoly_fs/1.4205...mage/image.gif

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/air-ca...sion-1.4204738

Ulic Qel-Droma 07-15-2017 04:22 AM

After I land the plane, I would go up to the air traffic control tower, and knock the lights out of the fucker that told me it was ok to land lol.

Quote:

The controller assured the pilot there is no one on the runway. Seconds later, another voice — apparently one of the pilots on the taxiway — interjects, "Where's this guy going? He's on the taxiway."

Only at that point did the controller order the Air Canada jet to pull up.

Mr.Money 07-15-2017 04:56 AM

ffffffuuuuuu.....knowing how much fuel those planes hold,i don't think anyone would've survived...tower control should be fired for life.

Infiniti 07-15-2017 05:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma (Post 8851847)
After I land the plane, I would go up to the air traffic control tower, and knock the lights out of the fucker that told me it was ok to land lol.

I think you misunderstood what happened. The AC flight was cleared to land on the vacant runway by ATC, however, for whatever reason (which is yet to be determined) on final approach the AC flight was lined up with a traffic laden parallel taxiway instead of the active runway.

If anything, you as the pilot should go up to the air traffic control tower and apologize to the controller for majorly screwing up a routine approach.

68style 07-15-2017 06:35 AM

ATC should also be able to see he's on the wrong path, they both fucked up... the pilot more so, but the position of ATC should *never* just "assume" that the plane is going to the right place simply because it's a routine landing.

twitchyzero 07-15-2017 07:42 AM

this should clear up any confusion

https://i.cbc.ca/1.4199192.149978134...-francisco.jpg


are there not warning systems in place that tells both pilots they are lined up for the wrong path? say when visibility is poor


if they tried correcting this even 2 seconds later approaching at a ground speed of 160kph, would it have tail-striked?

bcrdukes 07-15-2017 08:15 AM

And here I thought 9/11 was bad...

MG1 07-15-2017 08:46 AM

Half those pilots are high, anyway.................


I know a few of them and it's pretty common.



Don't drink and drive.... errrr....... I mean fly. They have cracked down on pilots who have become intoxicated before their flights, so if they were sober, I wAnder why the pilot and co-pilot were so confused. There has to be more to this. Distracted driving/flying?

westopher 07-15-2017 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ulic Qel-Droma (Post 8851847)
After I land the plane, I would go up to the air traffic control tower, and knock the lights out of the fucker that told me it was ok to land lol.

Maybe after you landed the plane you should hand over your flight license since you don't know the fucking difference between a runway and a taxiway.

snowball 07-15-2017 11:39 AM

How does one get the taxiway and runway mixed up?

https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media...iemmbbs8jt.png

https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media...2pwonmboso.png

subordinate 07-15-2017 11:51 AM

When you do the same shit every single time, you forget to actually think.

StylinRed 07-15-2017 01:22 PM

^^^^ its like driving, sometimes ur just totally zoned out, yet till operating the car, next thing u know ur at ur destination and you're like "wtf?" lol mistakes happen then, easily

nah 07-15-2017 01:35 PM

to put in perspective, this is 30m...

http://image.made-in-china.com/43f34...t-Lighting.jpg

westopher 07-15-2017 01:35 PM

Tons of fatigue is a huge issue in that industry as well. Fucked up schedules, and sometimes too much partying can get people to go full retard at the worst time.

hchang 07-15-2017 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by westopher (Post 8851866)
Maybe after you landed the plane you should hand over your flight license since you don't know the fucking difference between a runway and a taxiway.

Drive in a driveway and park in a parkway.

Eff-1 07-15-2017 02:20 PM

The controller bears no responsibility at that point. From the controller's screen and viewpoint from the tower, it wouldn't really be possible to see the pilot was lined up with the taxiway running parallel to the runway and only a few feet apart. SF has some of the narrowest distances between runways and taxiways in the USA. The controller did his job by clearing the aircraft to land as soon as the runway is clear. The pilot screwed up by lining up incorrectly and not failing to recognize the runway from the taxiway until much too late.

Of course, if a plane is on final approach from the north and it's an east-west runway, then you could blame the controller for not paying attention.

The good news is the system worked. The pilot (eventually) noticed his path wasn't clear, questioned the tower, which caught the attention of the controller and the other pilots on the taxiway who spoke up. The tower immediately called for a go-around (a standard procedure) and everyone stayed safe.

Yes there are instruments that let the pilot know if he's lined up with the runway correctly but at that time he was flying using visual flight rules, which means he's flying simply by looking out the window, not by using his instruments. It's a common thing.

yray 07-15-2017 04:19 PM


Thats what it looks like at night. It was VFR and simultaneous approach was probably allowed, ILS was should be shut off so no real guidance.

Those green lights should've notified the pilot that it was a taxiway but was blocked by the waiting aircraft bodies. However, not sure what was the light setting of the runway.

twitchyzero 07-15-2017 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by subordinate (Post 8851879)
When you do the same shit every single time, you forget to actually think.

Quote:

Originally Posted by StylinRed (Post 8851887)
^^^^ its like driving, sometimes ur just totally zoned out, yet till operating the car, next thing u know ur at ur destination and you're like "wtf?" lol mistakes happen then, easily

are pilots not trained to retain their situational awareness during take-off and landing? not one but both pilots

Quote:

Originally Posted by yray (Post 8851901)
Those green lights should've notified the pilot that it was a taxiway but was blocked by the waiting aircraft bodies. However, not sure what was the light setting of the runway.

runway was lit white, taxiway blue

answering my own question earlier, roughly a 10 second window to correct, otherwise almost 1000 casualties

Quote:

“On a normal 3-degree glide slope, an aircraft descends 320 feet for every nautical mile flown,” Trescott explained in his blog Trends Aloft. “So at 175 feet, an aircraft would be 0.55 nautical miles from the touchdown zone. The typical landing speed for an A320 is around 130 knots to 140 knots. At 140 knots, an aircraft covers 2.33 miles per minute, so it could travel 0.55 nautical miles in a little over 14 seconds. Of course, if you figure a typical airliner is perhaps 40 feet high … then it would have been about 11 seconds to impact.”

“I would say this is quite alarming and uncommon to be this close,” he said. “That’s relatively rare.”
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/07/1...s-to-disaster/

FerrariEnzo 07-15-2017 07:50 PM

Someone gona get fired!

Razor Ramon HG 07-15-2017 10:49 PM

The guilt of knowing that you almost killed thousands of people is a huge enough burden.

sonick 07-26-2017 10:57 AM

Quote:

AC flight near-missed the 'greatest aviation disaster in history'

twitchyzero 07-26-2017 10:09 PM

wish Carlin was still around...he'd have so much material from this messed up world for his stand-up performance.

GabAlmighty 07-27-2017 07:30 AM

So many armchair pilots in this world/thread...

Some people fucked up, but in the end the safety nets and training saved everyone from a giant catastrophe. i.e. questioning the controller, controller issuing a go around, etc.

At night it's extremely easy to get lost in the lights of a busy area such as that.

The_Situation 07-27-2017 07:38 AM

Publicity stunt for the movie 2:22

twitchyzero 08-03-2017 06:56 PM

hmm so it was actually worse...59ft (so less than six storeys)

I know it didn't fly directly over at lowest AGL but assuming the average height of airbus is 35ft...wow

https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media...0sdpyq4hz9.jpg

apparently control tower said the flight in question wasn't even on the radar at that point

and of course they let the cockpit audio overwrite to save their hides FailFish

Quote:

Originally Posted by GabAlmighty (Post 8853762)
So many armchair pilots in this world/thread...

Some people fucked up, but in the end the safety nets and training saved everyone from a giant catastrophe. i.e. questioning the controller, controller issuing a go around, etc.

At night it's extremely easy to get lost in the lights of a busy area such as that.

OK if you're an expert, why not try helping answer some questions instead of name-calling? Everyone fucks up some times...how common is it for both pilots to miss something so routine simultaneously? Busy or not, how do you mistake blue for white on approach? If it's extremely easy and a majorly flawed system, why haven't we heard of more stories like this often?

Not the first time in recently that AC doesn't wanna be accountable for poor piloting. Deflect, deflect, deflect.

https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/rep...beandmail.com&

A320 has only been in service and AC fleet forever...definitely a plane defect /s


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net