REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   PSA: VPD Handing Out VIs Like Candy (https://www.revscene.net/forums/715383-psa-vpd-handing-out-vis-like-candy.html)

BIC_BAWS 11-07-2018 11:33 AM

Another member here linked me to this https://opcc.bc.ca/about-us/
"Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner" responsible for mandating all municipal departments. (Obv excludes RCMP because that's fed)

yourself 11-07-2018 11:46 AM

Can we lock this thread? He can go fuck himself.

BIC_BAWS 11-07-2018 12:02 PM

No because:



1. This provides public documentation of our side of the whole story. Proves that we're not some cop-haters. Talks about the various public implications there are.



2. By not locking the thread, you're promoting transparency. Which at the moment, along with ethical accountability, is lacking from the VPD.

Berzerker 11-07-2018 12:43 PM

I've said for YEARS how the VI system is a completly flawed system. I know of 1 friend personally, who picked his car up after it passed inspection, drove 2 blocks (yes 2 blocks) and got pulled over and given another VI. After explaining the officer that he had just completed an inspection and showed the sticker and everything the officer said "oh well you'll have no trouble passing again then won't you?" and issued the VI.

This is the problem with the system. No disputing and no second opinions. No grace period just complete control by the police to issue at will.

Berz out.

CCA-Dave 11-07-2018 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Traum (Post 8927414)
I am preparing something to send to the Minister of Transportation and the VPD to express my concerns regarding the MVA and the VPD's execution of its clauses. Specifically, I'd like to focus on the issues of 1) wheel alignment / camber, and 2) clearance height / vehicle lowering, and I'd like to get a little help from everyone.

I've skimmed through the MVA a couple of times, and the only thing that I can find with regards to lowering / ride height is Section 7.091 regarding clearance height. I remember some of us have thrown around the "allowed to change ride height by +/- 1" line here in this thread, but I absolutely cannont find any referene of it or any sort of lowering in the MVA. I want to get this right in my letter of conern, so I am asking RS to help. Is that just some random BS certain officers are throwing around when they VI you, or is that written somewhere in the MVA?

Please advise. I will share the finished piece here before I send it out.

Link to the MVA for reference:
http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/...bc/26_58_multi

Page 52:
Wheel alignment
Side slip of the front wheels shall not exceed 9 m per 1.6 km as measured on the alignment gauge.
The caster, camber or toe-in of a vehicle shall not be out of adjustment to the extent that it is apparent visually.
Vehicles shall not be misaligned to the extent that the variation of the track exceeds 75 mm and the variation of axle centre exceeds 50 mm.

Page 46:
Clearance height
7.091 A motor vehicle with a gross vehicle weight rating of less than 4 500 kg must have a minimum clearance for all parts of it, other than the wheels in contact with the level roadway, that is no lower than the lowest point on the rim of any wheel in contact with the roadway.

Then in DIVISION 25 – VEHICLE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE, we find the following under Part 3 (page 154):

25.20 This Part applies to a vehicle that was
(b) altered by changes to its suspension height by more than 10 cm from the
original basic specification of the vehicle manufacturer,

Thus, if suspension height is altered by more than 10cm, the following must be applied:

25.21 A person must not drive, operate or park a vehicle on a highway until it has been presented to a designated inspection facility and an approved certificate of mechanical condition in a form set by the director has been issued in respect of the vehicle by an authorized person.
[en. B.C. Reg. 304/2001; am. B.C. Reg. 135/2003, s. 3.]

Duties of authorized persons
25.22 (1) An authorized person must not issue a certificate under section 25.21 unless he or she is satisfied, and certifies on the certificate, that the vehicle complies with the Act and its regulations and is safe for use on the highway.

Traum 11-07-2018 02:04 PM

Thank you for pointing that section out to me, CCA-Dave.

So given the clearance height clause in Section 7.091 and the modified vehicle requirements outlined in Section 25.20(b), I don't see how the typical vehicle lowering that many of us have done on our cars is illegal as long as it doesn't violate the clearance height requirement dictated in SEction 7.091. As a matter of fact, there is no legislation governing the amount of lowering we can do as long as the suspension height change is not more than 10cm -- only the clearance height is being goverened. In other words, the police cannot ding us for lowering our cars, but they can certainly use the insufficient clearance height clause to hit us if our cars violate that clause.

originalhypa 11-07-2018 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Berzerker (Post 8927446)
Spoiler!
.

This is the problem with the system. No disputing and no second opinions. No grace period just complete control by the police to issue at will.

Berz out.

It seems to me that this is the direction the police want to go. Where they have the power to use their own discretion. Judge, jury, executioner. It started with giving them the power to execute for excessive speed, dui, and VI.

yourself 11-07-2018 02:34 PM

Two of them are sitting at the end of the viaduct east bound shooting lasers out of their cocks.

68style 11-07-2018 02:43 PM

^
This has nothing to do with the VI situation

68style 11-07-2018 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by originalhypa (Post 8927458)
It seems to me that this is the direction the police want to go. Where they have the power to use their own discretion. Judge, jury, executioner. It started with giving them the power to execute for excessive speed, dui, and VI.

"I saw you using your cell phone...".... or "Your cellphone is in the cupholder so I think you are likely to use it"... can't dispute those massive tickets either.

How about Proceeds of Crime too? Super dangerous legislation allowing them to just decide to take possession of your vehicles or otherwise and then leaving it up to you to battle in court to prove your innocence.

Not affording an opportunity to dispute or challenge the discretionary ruling of any authority figure is a serious reduction of civil liberties.

yourself 11-07-2018 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 68style (Post 8927468)
^
This has nothing to do with the VI situation

It does considering they pulled a Lotus for no front plate. Not sure if it was issued a VI.

Raid3n 11-07-2018 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OverIt (Post 8927349)
I am new to RevScene since my latest VI. Figured I might as well give my account considering the situation at hand.

Spoiler!

once you're back on the road, let us know what goes down if he pulls you over again and you inform him that you passed it at a shop that you chose. i want to see what other BS he spews.

mb_ 11-07-2018 04:39 PM

@OverIt what was the $109 ticket for?

westopher 11-07-2018 05:43 PM

Operating a motor vehicle that doesn't comply with the MVA. I got the same one.

R1CED` 11-07-2018 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 68style (Post 8927469)
"Your cellphone is in the cupholder so I think you are likely to use it"... can't dispute those massive tickets either.

yep that one is a massive BS like "your device is not secured away and out of reach"
they think they can play Minority Report on our asses
even if they're right 80% of the time, it's a joke for the rest of the alleged offenders

BIC_BAWS 11-07-2018 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by westopher (Post 8927499)
Operating a motor vehicle that doesn't comply with the MVA. I got the same one.

Something just occurred to me.

How do they know you don't comply? That's why they're giving you a VI, because they are not vehicle inspectors, and can't say your car doesn't comply.

Wasn't someone's story exactly that? When asking why the VI was issued and on what grounds, cop just says "well i'm not a mechanic but i have reason to suspect, so here's a vi"

Then this is another issue. Now even more money is wasted on this.

68style 11-07-2018 08:41 PM

If you pass the inspection I would think you have a pretty open and shut case to dispute the $109 ticket

nsx042003 11-07-2018 09:02 PM

^ small claims court lol

68style 11-07-2018 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nsx042003 (Post 8927535)
^ small claims court lol

No. That’s for the VI costs... the $109 is an actual ticket, that should be the standard dispute process same as a speeding ticket.

donk. 11-08-2018 03:49 PM

the conclusion of this thread is:

welcome to Canada.

TOPEC 11-08-2018 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by yourself (Post 8927482)
It does considering they pulled a Lotus for no front plate. Not sure if it was issued a VI.

the cops r there almost 4 days a week during summer time. that location is a pretty well known speedtrap/cell trap, ppl drive that section like theyre on a highway doing 80+ or since theyre on the viaduct that no cops can spot them from the side using their cell phone.

use2bavolvo 11-08-2018 06:38 PM

New plates
 
The vi are tied to the plate
What happens when u get new plates?

mb_ 11-08-2018 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by use2bavolvo (Post 8927676)
The vi are tied to the plate
What happens when u get new plates?

They're tied to the car

BIC_BAWS 11-08-2018 08:06 PM

I'm too lazy to pull the video, but today at 5:30PM at Richmond Ikea, a Pontiac Vibe (Matrix) was driving around with no headlight - literally the entire left side headlight and housing was missing.

If anyone really deserves a VI due to unsafe vehicle, it should be people like that. WTF.

R1CED` 11-08-2018 08:44 PM

what does outlining examples like that achieve (which has already been stated dozens of time here) other than make us sound whiny?

if I get a ticket for speeding, while pulled over there's no point complaining to the officer you just saw someone ran a red light but the officer isn't pursuing them.

stock vehicles VI'd, yes please speak up. If it's clear as day your modification is within MVA, speak up.

if the accounts here are accurate, then yes some VPD members are being quite unprofessional. Like the guy 2 pages ago said, he or she is not contesting the validity of the VI, but moreso the attitude of the officers and them making shit up that drives us up the wall. Valid complaint.

everything else is just noise.

you get a pass because you haven't even gotten a ticket but is the one taking most of the initiative.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net