[Senna4ever]

looking for a place that rents out a tokina 11-16 (Canon) before I drop cash for one. Senna does Beau stock them for rent? If not does anyone know where else I could rent one locally?

No, we don't rent 3rd party lenses - too much trouble when it comes to quality control & servicing.

[Volvoman]

I currently have a Nikon D90 and I would like to purchase a wide angle zoom lens. These are the lowest Canadian prices i've found for the lenses.

Nikkor AF-S Zoom DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - $734.99CDN

Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DI II Zoom Lens for Nikon - $460CDN

Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM for Nikon - $584.99CDN

Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon - $699CDN

Is the Nikkor worth that much more than the Tamron and the Sigma?

[gilly]

^ also have the same question as him.

[Senna4ever]

I currently have a Nikon D90 and I would like to purchase a wide angle zoom lens. These are the lowest Canadian prices i've found for the lenses.

Nikkor AF-S Zoom DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - $734.99CDN

Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DI II Zoom Lens for Nikon - $460CDN

Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM for Nikon - $584.99CDN

Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon - $699CDN

Is the Nikkor worth that much more than the Tamron and the Sigma?
The Tokina is probably the sharpest of the bunch, but depending on your final image size, you may not notice. Is it worth more? That depends - if the Tokina/Sigma/Tamron fails and you have to get it serviced, you may not see your lens for a few months, and you'll have to pay for shipping out to Ontario. Typically, Nikon's servicing is quite fast (around 2 - 3 weeks for non-NPS) as long as the repair is not difficult. Nikon also has a service centre in Richmond so you can take it there yourself and actually talk to a person face to face.

[N.V.M.]

new used lens for me tomorrow!

*please don't flake*

[LiquidTurbo]

Nikon 17-55mm f2.8.. anyone here own it? Issues? Worth the money?

[Senna4ever]

Nikon 17-55mm f2.8.. anyone here own it? Issues? Worth the money?

If you're going to stick with DX cameras for the foreseeable future, I think it great. It's a sharp lens - think of it like it's the 24-70mm f2.8 for DX.

[Bath Tussue]

I am looking for a good all around lense for my XSi.
I am looking at one of these three lenses:
- 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
- 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
- 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

I already have the 18-55mm (kit lense) and 75-300mm (which i might sell).

The 75-300mm is kind of useless for me, because it doesn't have IS and i don't always have my tripod with me, although i kind of like the very narrow DOF.

The 18-55mm is very convenient, but it just doesn't zoom far enough for some of the stuff i do.

[Senna4ever]

^^^ How about the Canon 18-200? Or the Tamron 18-270 VC lens? I've heard it's not bad.

[ilvtofu]

I am looking for a good all around lense for my XSi.
I am looking at one of these three lenses:
- 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
- 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
- 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

I already have the 18-55mm (kit lense) and 75-300mm (which i might sell).

The 75-300mm is kind of useless for me, because it doesn't have IS and i don't always have my tripod with me, although i kind of like the very narrow DOF.

The 18-55mm is very convenient, but it just doesn't zoom far enough for some of the stuff i do.

Just read the review for the 18-135 by slrgear, seems like a decent quality lens for the price. But the 18-200 doesn't have much more distortion when you consider the additional amount of range. They are both solid lenses IMO but the 18-200 is significantly more on the used market which I wouldn't recommend getting unless you have to use a dslr. I'd rather save the money and get a entry level L lens for a bit more. I've read that the 17-85 isn't all that great also especially the abberation

I still own the 55-250 which is a very sharp lens but the 55 on a crop sensor is quite a long focal length which means you'll have to bring an extra lens along.

Anyways I have both the 18-200 and 55-250 on me right now PM me if you're interested. If you're coming to the photowalk I can bring both these lenses for you to try out!

EDIT: forgot to mention my everyday lens the sigma 17-70 F2.8-4.0 OS HSM Macro. Relatively affordable and versatile enough. 20 cm ish minimum focusing distance. Costed the equivalent of about $400CAD in hk locally you can probably find a similar one used for that price.

[Bath Tussue]

i am not sure if i can go to the photo walk yet
i will know by the day before
i will sign up once i know my schedule

[ilvtofu]

Nvm, went to broadway camera to look at it, hated it

[IMASA]

Nikon 17-55mm f2.8.. anyone here own it? Issues? Worth the money?

I have a love/hate relationship with my 17-55.

Love: The heavy duty build quality, fast, quite and consistant AF, 9 apperature blades, the big ass hood, and I got it new for a pretty good price.

Hate: The bulk - it sucks when you want to travel light. I tend not to bring it for vacations due to the weight/size and the fear of theft if I leave it in a rental car/locker. But the bulk is also what makes it so solid and feels good in your hands.

DX - I was trying to decide between the 17-55 vs the 24-70. It was about an $800 price difference back when I was buying. I kinda regret not getting the 24-70 now since I want to find an excuse to switch to FX.

The lens is kind old. You can find ppl trying to sell theirs for $800-1000 on the used sites.

[LiquidTurbo]

^ I just picked up the 17-55mm. There is 'clicking' noise when put on AF-C and the autofocus is hunting around... hard to describe. Otherwise the autofocus is pretty quick and quiet.

What does your copy sound like?

[IMASA]

I think yours is normal. Mine does make some clicking/clacking sound as it hunts around for focus, usually when it hits the limts, but overall, it is pretty quiet.

[insomniac]

should i trade my 80-200mm for a 17-55m?

just got a d90 today. not looking to spend alot..
what lens should i get? i need something thats practical..
maybe 18-55mm? what do you guys suggest?
and i also need a wideangle lens but im on a tight budget :(

thanks in advance.

[IMASA]

Buy a prime and practise. I'd recommend the 35mm 1.8 if you're on a budget.

[LiquidTurbo]

Why do you 'need' a wide angle? If you're on a budget, the 18-55mm does great. The 17-55mm is just luxury.

[gars]

I'm thinking of buying a new prime - namely the Canon 85mm F1.8, or the 100mm F2.

I was looking online, the difference between the two is only about $100. Any recommendations on one or the other?

[TOPEC]

the 85 1.8 has a lot of purple fringing. i was thinking of getting it until i read up on it.

[ddr]

hey senna, what's the nikon-EOS adapter you used the other day? any particular brand that's of better build quality and AF confirmation?

[Senna4ever]

hey senna, what's the nikon-EOS adapter you used the other day? any particular brand that's of better build quality and AF confirmation?

I use the Novoflex brand - it's one of the best made out there, but it costs $300. We're currently looking into becoming a Cinevate dealer, and they seem to have a very high quality adapter at a much lower price.

[european]

Pro's and cons between Nikon 400mm f2.8 and 500mm f4??
From what I know so far. I'm leaning towards 500mm f4. Weighs less, longer reach, fast, accurate, a bit cheaper as well. I heard you don't need a great tripod for it but I doubt that and won't use a crap tripod if I get the super lens. But I'm no expert on any of this.

[Senna4ever]

You're thinking of buying a 400 or 500 now? Haha...

I would go for the 500mm f4...it's a good compromise between focal length & weight. I can handhold the 500mm pretty much all day, the 400mm is so heavy it's much more difficult.

[gars]

the 85 1.8 has a lot of purple fringing. i was thinking of getting it until i read up on it.

really? I've read otherwise in most of the reviews... is purple fringing different from CA?

[Senna4ever]

^^^ Same thing. The Canon 85mm f1.8 has massive CA wide open, as does the f1.2.

[gars]

What about the 50mm F1.4? I just figured that since I have the 50mm F1.8, it'd be fun to try a new lens for portraits... and I've heard so many good things about the 85mm F1.8. Worth it you think?

[Senna4ever]

I've never really used the 50mm f1.4 or f1.8 so I don't have much of an opinion. The 85mm f1.8 is a sharp lens, just has lots of CA in very high contrast situations. Whether it's worth it to you is something only you can answer.

[european]

You're thinking of buying a 400 or 500 now? Haha...

I would go for the 500mm f4...it's a good compromise between focal length & weight. I can handhold the 500mm pretty much all day, the 400mm is so heavy it's much more difficult.

I've been thinking of buying one for a while just gotta find out if I wanna sell my car or not.

Thanks for the help and quick reply!

[Senna4ever]

How are you going to transport yourself with such a big lens without a car?

[moky]

What about the 50mm F1.4? I just figured that since I have the 50mm F1.8, it'd be fun to try a new lens for portraits... and I've heard so many good things about the 85mm F1.8. Worth it you think?

i have both the 50mm 1.4 and 1.8
while the 1.8 is a good bang for the buck, the 1.4F was clearly sharper and had better colour rendition (used the same camera settings and tweaks).

what i like about the 1.4F is that i find it usable even in 1.4 or 1.6F, and sharpness from 2.0F is sweet

the 50mm 1.8F i find needs to be around f2.2 for it to have sharper images

iirc i shot this with the 50 1.4F, 1/80s f8
http://i950.photobucket.com/albums/ad343/mokytron/scienceworld.jpg

for around 350, the 50mm 1.4F is a good deal. it's the mainstay on my dslr

[european]

How are you going to transport yourself with such a big lens without a car?

I guess I could always walk. It's a long ways to Reifel but I'm young. I can do it! :p
I could also buy my fathers Suzuki Aerio which has been parked for years since he got his Explorer.
I'll just have to work harder on saving. Be more thrifty I guess haha. Or just get another job.

[K-Dub]

All this talk about Canon 50 f1.4 and f1.8, what about the 50mm f2.5 Macro?ß

[Boostslut]

Pro's and cons between Nikon 400mm f2.8 and 500mm f4??
From what I know so far. I'm leaning towards 500mm f4. Weighs less, longer reach, fast, accurate, a bit cheaper as well. I heard you don't need a great tripod for it but I doubt that and won't use a crap tripod if I get the super lens. But I'm no expert on any of this.

Like Jason said i'd go for the 500mm F4 if your into it. Have you used one of these lenses because? Rent one for a day or weekend and see what you think of it. Also, some other things to think about when getting a longer lens is that accessories that your going to need when you have the lens. Like a very good tripod ($600-$1000) and a gimbal head ($600 or so). A replacement foot for the lens, and most likely a lens cover to keep it protected. Your looking at a good chunk of change to get into the game. If you can afford it that's great, and wish you good luck with saving your pennies. I got my 500mm, and am very happy with the results. Just wish i had the time to use it more often.

The price of Nikon super-tele's makes me cry. Good luck with your choice!

[Senna4ever]

Canon's pricing for their new telephoto lenses will also make your eyes water. The 400mm f2.8 has gone from about $7000 to $11,000!

[Boostslut]

Canon's pricing for their new telephoto lenses will also make your eyes water. The 400mm f2.8 has gone from about $7000 to $11,000!

:inout:

[Boostslut]

The following are newly announced prices for the new Super Telephotos in Canada.....

300 f/2.8L IS II ......... $7,349.99

400 f/2.8L IS II ......... $11,549.99

500 f/4L IS II .......... $9,999.99

600 f/4L IS II .......... $12,599.99

[RevRav]

I currently have a Nikon D90 and I would like to purchase a wide angle zoom lens. These are the lowest Canadian prices i've found for the lenses.

Nikkor AF-S Zoom DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED - $734.99CDN

Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DI II Zoom Lens for Nikon - $460CDN

Sigma 10-20mm F4-5.6 EX DC HSM for Nikon - $584.99CDN

Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm f/2.8 for Nikon - $699CDN

Is the Nikkor worth that much more than the Tamron and the Sigma?

Did you go ahead with this purchase? Which one did you decided on?

[N.V.M.]

wow, i put a wanted ad on CL for an EF 100 macro and got 5 responses in 2 hours.

[TOPEC]

wow, i put a wanted ad on CL for an EF 100 macro and got 5 responses in 2 hours.

Everyone wants the 100 L macro
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[N.V.M.]

Everyone wants the 100 L macro
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

actually, it's a wanted ad, if you'll re-read. tells me people don't want the macro anymore.

[gars]

i think he meant that they want to get rid of their OLD 100mm Macro, and get the NEW 100mm L Macro.

unless of course - your wanted Ad was for the new one.

[N.V.M.]

ah, gotcha, "L"...... and "IS" to boot! i think it's actually that newer "IS" too, "hybrid". surprised it's not called "HIS".

no, just looking for the older version.

[ilvtofu]

I know some of you guys have a lot of experience with the tamron 17-50 2.8 VC
I'm wondering if I should sell off my sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 os macro for it, I'm regretting the smaller aperture a little but I got it for the equivalent of about $400 CAD in hong kong

Right now I'm just looking for a nice walk around lens and considering the tamron and the sigma 18-50

The tokina 16-50 seems hard to find used and is pretty expensive new too, doesn't seem all that popular :/

[m3thods]

if you're looking at the VC one, the reviews I've read peg the new Sigma 17-50 OS HSM as a better choice, as it closes in on 17-55 territory. I've also read that the non-VC version of the Tamron is sharper than its VC cousin.

I personally have the Sigma 18-50 non-OS, and I sometimes find myself looking at the newer 17-50. But I'm so happy with the sharpness of my Sigma that I think it'd be too much of a hassle just to add OS :)

Although, HSM would be nice :whistle:

[ilvtofu]

I am a little confused sigma discontinued their 18-50 and is only making the 17-50 now?
http://www.sigmaphoto.com/shop/standard-zoom-lenses

You can still find the 18-50 for around the $420 mark on ebay, which is only about 10% more than in hk. I have to go renew my id this year sometime anyways but I want the 50 1.4 :D which I need more than the 18-50 lol I epic failed last year and a lot of stores were sold out of the 50 1.4 :(

[ddr]

the 17-50 is at a whole different price point and quality, or so the reviews say. it also has OS.

the non VC tamron is sharper than the VC one. i find the corners to be not sharp. i think my canon 17-55 IS is sharp edge to edge (the sigma is said to be even better at certain apertures), but others on here have discredited the 17-55 IS.

i'd keep the 17-70 and get something like a 30mm 1.4 or that 50 1.4 u were talking about.

[LiquidTurbo]

Any good suggetions for a good food photography lens?

[Senna4ever]

Any good suggetions for a good food photography lens?

Nikon 24mm PC-E, Canon 24mm TS-E or Canon 45mm TS-E.

[604778]

Looking to get a new fixed lens. Thinking of getting th Nikon 35mm F/1.8.
But I hear that apparently the Tokina 35mm F/2.8 is sharper then the Nikon one.

Feedback and info please?

[ddr]

Looking to get a new fixed lens. Thinking of getting th Nikon 35mm F/1.8.
But I hear that apparently the Tokina 35mm F/2.8 is sharper then the Nikon one.

Feedback and info please?

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1030&message=35040212

[LiquidTurbo]

Looking to get a new fixed lens. Thinking of getting th Nikon 35mm F/1.8.
But I hear that apparently the Tokina 35mm F/2.8 is sharper then the Nikon one.

Feedback and info please?

I had both. Just sold both. I think I enjoyed the Tokina more. Maybe it was just the copies, but I found the Tokina to be sharper.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[LiquidTurbo]

What's the difference between these two lens? (Same lens, different packaging)

http://i.imgur.com/tfZVe.jpg

[Senna4ever]

The packaging was updated.

[LiquidTurbo]

My question should have been "Is there a difference between these two lenses. " obviously the packaging got updated but do the lenses update too? Like a v1.01?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[m3thods]

there wasn't any news regarding a refresh, so my guess is that they're the same lens.

[european]

I'm looking at Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X for my Nikon D90. 599 shipped. Yay or nay? Or is there something better?

[Senna4ever]

My question should have been "Is there a difference between these two lenses. " obviously the packaging got updated but do the lenses update too? Like a v1.01?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

No change in the lenses themselves... At least none that they've made public.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[LiquidTurbo]

I'm looking at Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X for my Nikon D90. 599 shipped. Yay or nay? Or is there something better?

I just got the lens and LOVE it.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[JapaDog]

Strongly suggest the tokina 116
It's definitely a yay to me~
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[N.V.M.]

so what exactly happens when you put a lens designed for a smaller sensor on a full framed camera? will the image appear with a darkened frame? or blurred out edges?

[RevRav]

^ It will vary from model to model, and depends which apt you're shooting at.

[gars]

so what exactly happens when you put a lens designed for a smaller sensor on a full framed camera? will the image appear with a darkened frame? or blurred out edges?

Ya, it depends on the lens. Usually - it's just very very strong vignetting.

The A900 actually detects that you have an crop-frame lens on and will automatically only use a crop frame sized portion of the sensor. Only thing is when you look through the viewfinder - there's a box that shows where the crop frame picture is being cut off, making it hard to frame pictures properly.

[LiquidTurbo]

Nikon 35mm f1.4

How the heck does this lens cost $1,800 and the 35mm f1.8 cost $200? I know the 35mm is DX, but it this lens really worth the money? It seems impossible to justifly the cost..

[N.V.M.]

look at the Canon 50mm 1.4 and 1.2. crazy.

[Senna4ever]

Nikon 35mm f1.4

How the heck does this lens cost $1,800 and the 35mm f1.8 cost $200? I know the 35mm is DX, but it this lens really worth the money? It seems impossible to justifly the cost..
If you use it in a professional setting like weddings & portraiture, then yes, it's worth its weight in gold.

[djm]

Looking to upgrade from my 18-55mm f3.6-5.6 IS lens for my Canon XSi. Looking for the best value walkaround lens:

Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II VC LD
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di
Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS
Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM

Some discontinued Canon lens:
Canon EF 28-70mm f3.5-4.5
Canon EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 USM

[Jsunu]

Looking to upgrade from my 18-55mm f3.6-5.6 IS lens for my Canon XSi. Looking for the best value walkaround lens:

Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM
Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II VC LD
Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di
Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS
Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM

Some discontinued Canon lens:
Canon EF 28-70mm f3.5-4.5
Canon EF 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 USM

Wow was gonna ask this exact same question... more specifically how does the Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM perform as a semi-decent walk around lens?

[!MiKrofT]

I'm using the Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 VC as my default lens.

The 17-85 is a pretty average lens. I wouldn't get this one personally.

[insomniac]

hey guys, im quite a noob at photography
picked up my first camera this year..
so right now i want a zoom lens that zooms farther
right now i have a 80-200 and 300mm. both are 2.8
im on a tight budget. should i just get one of those zoom multipliers or what are they called?
or i want something more compact. quality isnt important because the pictures will just be of events. i had a hella hard time with the 80-200 this morning for 4 hours haha

[gilly]

^you have a 300mm and you need to zoom farther? what are you shooting? the moon?

[!MiKrofT]

I'd recommend a teleconverter if you need more zoom.

[ddr]

get a 500mm mirror lens

[insomniac]

^how much are those and which one do you recommend getting?

im thinking about getting a 18-200 so i dont have to carry my 35-70 and 80-200 around all the time lol
everyone tells me i shouldnt do it because of "bad quality" but i really dont mind at this point because of the inconvenience. im only taking pictures of casual events, assemblies, parades, etc. will be working with not alot of space lol. basically i need
1) a daily "get shit done" lens (wider and greater range than the 35-70. 35-70 is pretty good sometimes but really sucks to work with. its loud, af is way slower than manual focusing and sometimes it doesnt even work. im getting a sigma 17-70 this weekend but like i said i need something thats all around so 18-200? willing to spend 300-400 on this one.)
2) a lens that can zoom even farther but quality doesnt matter as long as i can get peoples facial expressions
@!MiKrofT yeah haha those are what i was talking about. which one do you recommend?

tia you guys

[ilvtofu]

@737! If you just need a lens for PW events 300mm is more than enough. I went through the whole year with just my 55-250 and took literally thousands of pics, but since you want a kit lens so badly give the tamron 18-270 a shot. Don't expect much out of image quality especially at the longer end


^how much are those and which one do you recommend getting?

im thinking about getting a 18-200 so i dont have to carry my 35-70 and 80-200 around all the time lol
everyone tells me i shouldnt do it because of "bad quality" but i really dont mind at this point because of the inconvenience. im only taking pictures of casual events, assemblies, parades, etc. will be working with not alot of space lol. basically i need
1) a daily "get shit done" lens (wider and greater range than the 35-70. 35-70 is pretty good sometimes but really sucks to work with. its loud, af is way slower than manual focusing and sometimes it doesnt even work. im getting a sigma 17-70 this weekend but like i said i need something thats all around so 18-200? willing to spend 300-400 on this one.)

tia you guys

EDIT: Sounds like you should just sell your dslr if image quality means nothing to you, take that money and get a handycam or something with 400x zoom etc... 18-200 has pretty slow AF in my experience

[djm]

I'm using the Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 VC as my default lens.

The 17-85 is a pretty average lens. I wouldn't get this one personally.

Just realized the non VC version is $100 less (~$389) vs the VC version (~$499). Is the VC a must have?

[LiquidTurbo]

Not really, at those focus lengths and the fact that it's f2.8

If you can afford it, the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 seems to be a killer new fast kit lens.

[ilvtofu]

Not really, at those focus lengths and the fact that it's f2.8

If you can afford it, the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 seems to be a killer new fast kit lens.

I'm thinking of trading in my 17-70 for one! :)
Although I'm also looking at the 18-50 which is less than half the price but of course you lose out on the OS and the HSM

[ddr]

the focus is pretty awful on my friend's 18-50

i'd go for the 17-50, and test it thoroughly in a store. you can read up on the QC in flickr forums

[gars]

I have the Sigma 18-50 and it's great. No problems focusing, etc.

Sigma did used to have QC problems - but that was many years ago. I wouldn't expect you to have any issues with any that you buy now...

The Tamron 17-50 non-VC is supposed to be just as good though, maybe even marginally better for around the same price? I only went with the Sigma because of the 72mm filters, and I had a few filters already from my Sigma 17-70.

[BrRsn]

hey guys,

I need a good walk around lens

is the Sigma 18-55 DC f2.8 (non macro) lens good? I found one for $150 OBO with a broken aperture (stuck at F2.8). I figure if I buy it and spend $50-$100 fixing it I'll get a pretty nice lens thats right in my budget ...otherwise there's no way I can afford this lens. I need it for a project I'm doing with a friend and we're trying to stay as low budget as possible. It's going on a t2i .. yay or nay?

[ddr]

is that 18-55 a very old model? i've only heard of the 18-50, and the newer 17-50 OS. i don't think an out of warranty fix from Sigma is $50-100.

[BrRsn]

is that 18-55 a very old model? i've only heard of the 18-50, and the newer 17-50 OS. i don't think an out of warranty fix from Sigma is $50-100.

Nevermind, fail on me. For some reason I kept thinking it was the newer model :speechless:


Eff I'm lost. I just need something that's a good slightly wider lens, that's fairly fast, and has a decent range of zoom (My kit lens would be perfect if its image quality wasn't absolute garbage/it wasn't so slow). It also needs to be fairly sharp (I'm pretty content with the overall sharpness of my cheap prime 50mm f1.8) I'm going to be using it for some portraits, but also going to be used for making movies (Some in low light conditions). I tried looking myself but there's hundreds upon hundreds of lenses that fit my description. My only other request is that it be reasonably priced ~$500. Suggestions? Canon EOS mount please (t2i)

I do not mind buying used at all, if someone on RS is selling something that fits my needs, please let me know! (Rather deal with rs-ers than randoms off craigslist)

[ddr]

ur only choices around 500 is the tamron (non-VC for pictures, VC for video), and the sigma 17-70 2.8-4 macro i think. either will not be anywhere as sharp as your 50 1.8 at their larger apertures.

[K-Dub]

tamron 17-50 is the only way to go for your price point.

[BrRsn]

ur only choices around 500 is the tamron (non-VC for pictures, VC for video), and the sigma 17-70 2.8-4 macro i think. either will not be anywhere as sharp as your 50 1.8 at their larger apertures.

tamron 17-50 is the only way to go for your price point.

Sorry for the multi, but it's actually the Sigma 18-50 F2.8 .. he made a mistake when posting.

Look at attached pics and advise me please ... I looked around and it seems like a decent lens for the price ... thoughts? Or should I just save up a bit more and go for a nicer lens that's brand new/has warranty?

[K-Dub]

Meet the seller, bring your camera & laptop so you can pixel peep the quality of the images?

[BrRsn]

Meet the seller, bring your camera & laptop so you can pixel peep the quality of the images?

Will do,

I looked it up and it'll cost me ~$50 if the blades are sticking inside the lens, which is pretty reasonable. It'll be more if the actual motor inside is malfunctioning but how can I find out if the motor is malfunctioning? Is the Aperture motor somehow connected to the Autofocus motor, so if it autofocuses I'm good?

Do you guys know off hand/ball park figure how much it'd cost to get a new aperture motor put in? (I've read it ranging from $90 - $170 thru sigma)

This will be replacing my 18-55mm kit lens (Which is a piece of crap imo) which is my walkaround lens. Maybe I can throw that on ebay and recoup a bit of the cost.

[77civic1200]

whooops, nevermind wrong mount

[Euro7r]

Anyone using a Nikon 24-70mm F2.8? Consider purchasing that as my next lens. Is it worth the purchase?

[LiquidTurbo]

Anyone using a Nikon 24-70mm F2.8? Consider purchasing that as my next lens. Is it worth the purchase?

Do you have a FX body? It's an FX lens. For FX zooms, you really can't get much better.

[Senna4ever]

Anyone using a Nikon 24-70mm F2.8? Consider purchasing that as my next lens. Is it worth the purchase?
Oh, hell yes. We have 5 of the Nikon 24-70 & 4 of the Canon 24-70. The Nikons are all noticeably sharper than the Canon lenses for sure.

[LiquidTurbo]

Anyone using a Nikon 24-70mm F2.8? Consider purchasing that as my next lens. Is it worth the purchase?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBCoCZpNPP8

[!MiKrofT]

Not really, at those focus lengths and the fact that it's f2.8

If you can afford it, the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 seems to be a killer new fast kit lens.
Hmm wonder if the Sigma HSM for focus is any faster. That's the only thing I don't like so much on the Tamron.

[Euro7r]

Do you have a FX body? It's an FX lens. For FX zooms, you really can't get much better.

I'm using a crop. But might eventually upgrade to FX in the future, so if I invest into this lens, I can use it on future bodies.

[Euro7r]

Oh, hell yes. We have 5 of the Nikon 24-70 & 4 of the Canon 24-70. The Nikons are all noticeably sharper than the Canon lenses for sure.

If Senna says "hell yes", this makes stronger consideration for me to purchase :fullofwin:

[LiquidTurbo]

He gets commission. :troll: jk
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[K-Dub]

Which flash should I get?

I have wireless triggers but haven't had time nor money to buy a flash, and now I have the budget to do so. Budget is $500 incl tax, and I'm shooting with Canon 7D.

I can either stick with Canon (430EX II or a used 580EX I/II) or maybe a Nikon SB-600.

OR.. should I pick up TWO flashes?

Suggestions please! Off-camera flash is new to me. :)

[Senna4ever]

Nissin's Di-866 flashes are quite nice, and they're more than $100 cheaper than the 580EXII. I have one if you want to take a look at it.

[K-Dub]

Nissin's Di-866 flashes are quite nice, and they're more than $100 cheaper than the 580EXII. I have one if you want to take a look at it.
Ahhh does your store or anyone else have this locally in stock?

Will try to drop by and check it out, I'll let you know beforehand.

[ddr]

what should i look for when purchasing a 2nd hand flash. the seller it's been used 3 times. who knows. grabbing another 430exII.

[Pinoy_Crx]

Hey guys i have a nikon d60 i have the 18-55 lens i wanted to get some input on thats another
Type of lens i could get thanks will mainly be using for street photos
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[Senna4ever]

Ditch the 18-55 and get the 17-55mm f2.8 if you can. That might be a good start...and then get some wide prime lenses.

[RevRav]

Hey guys i have a nikon d60 i have the 18-55 lens i wanted to get some input on thats another
Type of lens i could get thanks will mainly be using for street photos
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

There's a billion of lens out there. You're gonna have to provide us a least a bare budget you want to work at....

[N.V.M.]

couple shiny new lenses.....:fuckyea:


Sigma 150mm Macro, and the Canon EF 70-300 L IS

http://www.epicdevelopements.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/lensimage.jpg

[m3thods]

^beautiful. I hear nothing but great things about the Sigma 150. And the 70-300L, well that's already becoming a great addition to the L family.

[N.V.M.]

couple of macros from today( from Reifel) :

http://www.epicdevelopements.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/snake1.jpg


http://www.epicdevelopements.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/flower1.jpg

[bigzz786786]

anybody have any thoughts on the tamron 18-270 mm with the new pzd?

i need a all around lens for traveling

i heard that it's a bit soft at full zoom, but can be corrected a bit by stopping at f/8

[LiquidTurbo]

^ How often do you need 270mm?

A good all around lens is a 18-55mm. Haha.

[bigzz786786]

^i'll be needing it quite often, i already got some advice from a few photographer friends, i'll be getting it soon

especially for this year and next
i'll be going to Vegas, Africa, India, Dubai, Hong Kong, Beijing, Taiwan, Shanghai, and various random places, when ever i go to India, Dubai, Africa i go on desert safari's and wild life safari's, not to mention zoo's, aquariums, lots of scenic opportunities

im pretty sure the farthest i would usually zoom is to 200mm, but there will definitely be times where a 270mm zoom would come in handy



18 - 55mm is definitely not my idea of a good all around lens, and the 55-250 i herd is not worth it, way to soft especially on the edges

eventually, when i get more of a steady income, i'll be upgrading to better quality lenses

[604778]

anybody have any thoughts on the tamron 18-270 mm with the new pzd?

i need a all around lens for traveling

i heard that it's a bit soft at full zoom, but can be corrected a bit by stopping at f/8

I'm also planning on getting that lens.

[ForbiddenX]

hmm sigma 10-20mm or should I continue on my quest to saving up for a 70-200mm 2.8?

I currently have:
50mm 1.4
85mm 1.8
17-50mm 2.8

I would really love a telephoto and I have my eyes on the 70-200mm VRI. Would there be a different alternative or should I just keep saving? I wouldn't mind getting a wide angle lens either like the 10-20mm

[LiquidTurbo]

Ditch the 18-55 and get the 17-55mm f2.8 if you can. That might be a good start...and then get some wide prime lenses.

that's bad advice since he has a D60... 17-55mm much too front heavy.

[ddr]

what if you added a battery grip?

i'm not sure if that's bad advice ... b/c of ergonomics

[Senna4ever]

that's bad advice since he has a D60... 17-55mm much too front heavy.
Not really...it's not that heavy - the 14-24 is front heavy. The D60 isn't super light like a D40, and the 17-55 is the top DX zoom for Nikon.

[LiquidTurbo]

^D60 is almost the same weight at the D40, maybe 20g more.

17-55mm seems overkill for the D40/D40x/D60/D3000/D3100.. probably better matched to D90/D7000/D300s IMO.

With a D60, must as well stick with a 18-55mm kit lens. There's not too much wrong with it.

Anohter problem is that the 17-55mm is $1400. That seems way overkill for an older entry level body, with pretty much the same zoom range, but MUCH heavier lens and larger.

I would think an investment in the $200 35mm f1.8 would do more for photography, esp if he wants do street photos.

Or, if he really insists on a fast zoom, Sigma 16-50 f2.8 is a good choice and save $600 in the process. It's lighter too.

However, my vote is the 16-85mm. I used it all the time for the D40, and I really liked it, esp the VR function, since the D40 had bad higher ISO performance.

[Senna4ever]

I think it's better to have a good lens on a cheaper body than vice versa. If budget allows, I'd say go for it. I don't consider it heavy personally.

I would never even consider a Sigma - what if it fails for some reason? You're going to wait 3-4 months to get it back from servicing.

Nikon 16-85....forgot about that one...I keep forgetting about the various DX lenses Nikon has since we don't stock them.

[604778]

I need a new wide angle lens pretty bad. I've been using the Nikon 18-55mm kit lens for sometime now.

I was thinking of the new Tamron 18-270mm PZD version and the Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 lens.

I've heard good reviews for both lenses... still not to sure which one to go for.

[Senna4ever]

How about the aforementioned Nikon 16-85?

[604778]

^havent heard much about it.
Ill look into it.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[ddr]

what exactly do you mean by 'good'? good value? good performance? the sigma 17-50 >> 18-50 from what i've read.

[gilly]

I need a new wide angle lens pretty bad. I've been using the Nikon 18-55mm kit lens for sometime now.

I was thinking of the new Tamron 18-270mm PZD version and the Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 lens.

I've heard good reviews for both lenses... still not to sure which one to go for.

nikon 10-24mm

[LiquidTurbo]

^ That's not a particularly good Wide Angle lens imo.

1. It's expensive
2. It's soft just about everywhere
3. The build quality is inferior to the older Nikon 12-24mm.


If you need wide angle, in my opinion, the Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 is king.

[m3thods]

what exactly do you mean by 'good'? good value? good performance? the sigma 17-50 >> 18-50 from what i've read.

the truth, but at more than 50% more cost, it's pretty hefty cost difference. I personally have the 18-50 and am very happy with it, but would definitely jump to the 17-50 for the OS and HSM.

[Euro7r]

Looking at the 80-200 F2.8D ED Lens. I've seen a couple ranging from $700-$900 on CL. Anyone have experience or suggestions on this len? Any common issues I should include in my considerations?

[N.V.M.]

just to articulate another recent event over the phone with Kerrisdale cameras, i will never shop there if its the last friggin camera store on the planet.

seems like an easy question, will you price match this certain item which is cheaper at Broadway or Lens&Shutter?

answer, yes, no, maybe. come on down, we'll let you know. we do, most of the time, but am not sure. jebus.

[604778]

I feel like the new Tamron would do. The 18-270mm PZD version. Would it be good for traveling?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[bigzz786786]

^ I ended up getting the new tamron 18-270, I love it, it definitely is lighter and more compact, and a great all around walking/traveling lens
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[LiquidTurbo]

Anyone got the Sigma 17-50mm f2.8 OS?

[Matsuda]

^ I have the 18-50 f2.8 HSM lol

[gars]

^ I have the 18-50 f2.8 non-HSM hehehe

[bigzz786786]

couple pics i took with the tamron 18-270 pzd, with a rebel xsi, no post processing

18mm
http://i1225.photobucket.com/albums/ee382/zamir786/IMG_3463.jpg

270mm (for the rest)
http://i1225.photobucket.com/albums/ee382/zamir786/IMG_3464.jpg

http://i1225.photobucket.com/albums/ee382/zamir786/IMG_3477.jpg

http://i1225.photobucket.com/albums/ee382/zamir786/IMG_3474.jpg

http://i1225.photobucket.com/albums/ee382/zamir786/IMG_3470.jpg

[LiquidTurbo]

^ I have the 18-50 f2.8 HSM lol

^ I have the 18-50 f2.8 non-HSM hehehe

Yea, there's not a whole lot of literature on the 17-50mm, the stuff that I have come across say's that it's sharper than the Nikon 17-55m f2.8 and Canon 17-5mm f2.8.

It also have OS, (VR or IS etc)which the Nikon doesn't have. It's also 1/2 the price. LOL.

[gars]

Yea, there's not a whole lot of literature on the 17-50mm, the stuff that I have come across say's that it's sharper than the Nikon 17-55m f2.8 and Canon 17-5mm f2.8.

It also have OS, (VR or IS etc)which the Nikon doesn't have. It's also 1/2 the price. LOL.

Ya, i've been reading up on reviews about it as well - thought long and hard about upgrading.

but 2 things bug me - the rotating front element - which sucks if you use a CPL - as well as the non-USM equivalent (which isn't that big a deal I guess)

but that's why it's probably cheaper.

[LiquidTurbo]

^ the front element doesn't rotate, just the focus ring:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F14IXyqs8jw&feature=related


I have the Nikon 17-55mm right now.. I wonder if I should have got the Sigma instead. Seems to be a winner, and according to DxOmark, sharper than the Nikon... I've been finding that I can't hand hold anything slower than 1/50s. I miss VR/IS/OS.

[gars]

^ the front element doesn't rotate, just the focus ring:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F14IXyqs8jw&feature=related


I have the Nikon 17-55mm right now.. I wonder if I should have got the Sigma instead. Seems to be a winner, and according to DxOmark, sharper than the Nikon... I've been finding that I can't hand hold anything slower than 1/50s. I miss VR/IS/OS.

oops, misread the article.

seems like a good choice for Nikon!

[TeriyakiSawce]

What would you buy D90 with 18-105 or 18-55 & 55-200? Thanks.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[ilvtofu]

What would you buy D90 with 18-105 or 18-55 & 55-200? Thanks.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

I think it's preference, IIRC the 18-55 has better quality than the 18-105 which can get pretty distorted. however the 18-105 is a pretty practical lens for focal range and that might suit your needs better. You can usually get away with just taking the 18-105 out with you.

The 55-200 is a pretty sharp lens for the price too,

[LiquidTurbo]

What would you buy D90 with 18-105 or 18-55 & 55-200? Thanks.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

Switching lens is a pain.

if you can live w/ 18-105 just do that. How many shots will you actually make from the 100-200mm range? My guess is not too many.

[RCubed]

Looking for a walkaround prime for nikon. Budget <$600.
Suggestions?
I was thinking a the 35mm 1.8 or 24 2.8

[ddr]

sigma 30mm f/1.4, if you can stomach sigma's warranty.

[LiquidTurbo]

Looking for a walkaround prime for nikon. Budget <$600.
Suggestions?
I was thinking a the 35mm 1.8 or 24 2.8

Not much choice... 35mm f1.8 is the way to go. Best bang for buck.

What's wrong with the 50mm f1.8 or f1.4? Decent choice too.

[gars]

I think the 50mm is a little long as a "walkaround" prime.

I'm jealous that Nikon has the 35 1.8....

[604778]

After seeing the reviews on you youtube of the Sigma 17-50mm OS. Kinda condering it now. But the Tamron 18-270mm PZD is still on my mind also.. I could use that extra zoom..

Hard to decide :(
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[ddr]

i think the aperture, OS effectiveness, and sharpness are just incomparable. huge difference. if you can't tell the difference then by all means, go with the 18-270. most users will tell you to get a separate zoom for the occasional shot if you think you will need it.

[N.V.M.]

I think the 50mm is a little long as a "walkaround" prime.




it is. i did a couple walks with just my 50mm, i kept kicking myself on a lot of missed shots if i had something shorter.

[LiquidTurbo]

Thoughts on Zeiss Planar and Distagon lens? Any way of testing these lenses also?

[Senna4ever]

"Planar" & " Distagon" are types of lens designs. Which Planar & Distagon lenses do you want to try? I know Leo's has the new Zeiss lenses for Canon & Nikon and Genesis Matrix just received a full set of CP lenses.

[LiquidTurbo]

Well I was rather interested in the 35mm f1.4 Distagon or perhaps the older version too. I'm just curious about the feel and using these lens.. how much approx to rent them?

[Senna4ever]

^^^ Google?

[TeriyakiSawce]

I currently have a kit 18-105. I've been more interested in street photo and portrait shots. I've been debating over the
35mm 1.8, 50mm 1.4, or Tamron 17-50 2.8. What do you guys think? Thanks.

[gilly]

^ 35mm

[insomniac]

How much do you guys think a sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5 is worth?
What's a better all around lens for the price?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[ddr]

isn't the 2.8-4 better and newer? it's either that or the tamron in this price range

[RCubed]

How much do you guys think a sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5 is worth?
What's a better all around lens for the price?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
that 17-70 would fit my range perfectly. 'cept I havent heard anything good about this lens.

[moky]

^ i've had a sigma 17-70 before and it was pretty good for the price. the f2.8 is actually only from 17-20mm then it goes up, but for what it costs vs (back then) canon's 17-85 f4-5.6, i was pretty pleased. had a sharp copy too :) some people don't like the "warm glow" it provided though but i was always particular to the warmth.

[insomniac]

i have the sigma 17-70 haha. it was the first lens i bought after i got my first camera earlier this year. im just wondering what would be a nice upgrade for around the same price range.
mine isnt every sharp shooting people but its sharp when shooting objects. the pictures it takes are kinda soft. im just asking for a price check because i think i got ripped off. i bought it for $400 and i see some for cheaper but with os hsm but not in the best condition. but i got mine mint with everything in the box. right now im trying to figure a price to sell it for.

@moky, i love the warm glow too! i like to increase the temperature when editing on top of the glow haha

[N.V.M.]

and, the new lens in the bag, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 ATX DX :

http://www.epicdevelopements.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/lens.jpg


edit: arrrg, dust! :blushsmile:

[ddr]

Sigma AF 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC HSM OS macro >> Sigma AF 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC macro

[ilvtofu]

yeah I have the HSM OS and it's a pretty good walkaround lens, I stopped using my 17-40 L because of the OS helps loads at night without a tripod. It's very sharp, maybe you should just upgrade to it

[N.V.M.]

so i've discovered the Tokina 11-16 does work with my sensor(aps-h), however, when @ 11mm, the hood comes into view!

http://www.epicdevelopements.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/awning1000.jpg

[LiquidTurbo]

Seems it pulls extrawide

I love my Tokina. Great lens! Poor man's version of the Nikon 14-24

[ilvtofu]

Has anyone used the MP-E 65? It seems like a really neat lens
Any suggestions for macro lenses, flowers, bugs, small objects etc.?

[RCubed]

Im looking for a little more reach from my 70-200.

Anyone know anything about the Kenko MC4 1.4x Teleconverters?
Reviews are a hit and miss with this thing. Some people say its as good as the Nikon TC-14E, and others say its shit.

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/674591-REG/Kenko_MC4AF1_4DGXN_TelePlus_MC4_AF_1_4X.html
http://static.bhphotovideo.com/images/images345x345/674591.jpg

[rexsomnii]

What do you think of the Canon EF 35-105mm Zoom Lens f/4.5-5.6 for $30 dollars.

Basic use, just bored of my kit lens from my t2i.

The only thing is that the electronic is disabled ? Getting it on ebay, and this is what the seller is saying.

" The electronics for this lens have been disconnected and the aperture set on full. "

So this pretty much means manual focus ? anything else i should know about it ?

Heres the full summarized description .
The glass in this 35 - 105mm lens rivals the high quality and excellent optics of the L-series lenses for quality. This is a beautiful, beautiful lens with absolutely gorgeous glass. HOWEVER: The electronics in this lens malfunctioned and when I opened it, the ribbon was broken across several circuit. I have removed the contacts and the ribbon just under the mount, opened the aperture wide, and have been using it with great success on Manual Focus using the aperture priority (AV) setting on my 300D. The glass and body are still excellent, the photos are still excellent, and the manual focus and zoom still work well.


http://img.auctiva.com/imgdata/5/7/0/1/8/3/webimg/481866223_o.jpg
http://www.auctiva.com/hostedimages/showimage.aspx?gid=570183&ppid=1122&image=481866246&images=481866209,481866223,481866232,481866246,481 866255&formats=0,0,0,0,0&format=0

http://www.auctiva.com/hostedimages/showimage.aspx?gid=570183&ppid=1122&image=481866255&images=481866209,481866223,481866232,481866246,481 866255&formats=0,0,0,0,0&format=0



etc..

[ForbiddenX]

I'm still looking for a new prime and I'm not sure which one I should get. I'm either thinking the 35mm 1.8D or the 24mm 2.8D.

I was leaning towards the 24mm since it's a wider prime and would be interesting to play with one. I currently have a 50mm 1.4D and a 85mm 1.8D as my primes.

Also, anyone have any experience with the Nikon 24-70mm 2.8? Thinking of upgrading from my 17-50mm 2.8 to one of them.

[Boostslut]

Has anyone used the MP-E 65? It seems like a really neat lens
Any suggestions for macro lenses, flowers, bugs, small objects etc.?

I had one for about a year, until i sold it for bigger things. It's a great lens, but you NEED a MR-14EX, or the MR-24 or whatever its called to make it happen. It's the hardest most frustrating lens you will ever use, but the results that you get out of it are amazing if you know how to use it. If it's your first macro lens, get a Canon 100mm macro, the Sigma 105mm Macro, or even the Tamron 90mm Macro. They are all good first macro lenses.

Fuck I'm drunk. Had to rewrite this about 5 times to make it make sense.

[TOPEC]

what kind of ultra wide angel are out there for canon full frame?

i currently know there are:
Canon 17-40
Canon 16-35
Sigma 12-24

what other options r out there?
im looking for a UWA that is good quality and a decent price, so the 16-35 is out of the question

TIA

[Boostslut]

I like the Canon 17-40 F4L on a crop, but i LOVE it on full-frame!

[77civic1200]

I like the Canon 17-40 F4L on a crop, but i LOVE it on full-frame!

+1 :h5:

[JordanLee]

16-35 2.8L or 17-40L

+ 55 FD 1.2

+ 85 1.2L

Or scrap the 85 1.2L and buy a 70-200 2.8 IS MK1?

All being paired to a 5D.

[604778]

Tamron SP AF 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD IF
or
Sigma AF 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC HSM OS

[insomniac]

^been looking at the same lenses and people prefer the tamron one more

[ddr]

the sigma lens is the one that's optically better... it's also much more $$.

[K-Dub]

Anyone used a Sigma 24 f1.8 Macro before?

Looking to get rid of my zoom lenses and use only primes.

[mb_]

and, the new lens in the bag, Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 ATX DX :

http://www.epicdevelopements.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/lens.jpg


edit: arrrg, dust! :blushsmile:

How's the lens treating you so far? Currently one of my "to buy" lenses and it seems to be sharper than the Nikon 10-24MM, based on Ken Rockwell's review.

[LiquidTurbo]

^ I have it also. It's sharp at anything except f2.8

[K-Dub]

fffffffff someone stop me, i'm so close to pulling the trigger on a Sigma 24 f/1.8.....

Sigma 24mm/1.8 - a set on Flickr

[J____]

fffffffff someone stop me, i'm so close to pulling the trigger on a Sigma 24 f/1.8.....

Sigma 24mm/1.8 - a set on Flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/aubec/sets/72157611491927298/)

dont. get the canon 24L mk2 :D

[K-Dub]

sure, let me just pick the money off my tree... :okay:

[mb_]

^ I have it also. It's sharp at anything except f2.8

Worth the buy?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[K-Dub]

Worth the buy?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
yes. I've had mine since 08.

[LiquidTurbo]

Worth the buy?
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

Lately I've been thinking of selling it.. lol. if you want, shoot me a PM. Mint condition, NIkon mount.

[mb_]

I'll PM you after I get my D7000 haha

$759 at Broadway Camera and $659USD at Adorama. Jesus.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[Wilsonia]

Hey guys, what are your thoughts on the 85mm 1.8. I read from somewhere that you guys have purchased it for a great deal (380) or something.. but then again I've seen you guys selling it so i was wondering if there's something wrong with the lens or did you switch to another alternative.

I'm currently using a 24-60 2.8 Sigma and am looking for a sharper copy for portrait purposes.

[mb_]

I heard 85mm F1.8 is good for portraits and I would imagine so. If you're using it on a crop sensor it'll be like 125mm.
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[giCe]

Hey guys, what are your thoughts on the 85mm 1.8. I read from somewhere that you guys have purchased it for a great deal (380) or something.. but then again I've seen you guys selling it so i was wondering if there's something wrong with the lens or did you switch to another alternative.

I'm currently using a 24-60 2.8 Sigma and am looking for a sharper copy for portrait purposes.

50mm 1.8! cheap and perfect on a crop.
or 50mm 1.4 if you want to dish out a little more

[Volvoman]

I have a 50mm 1.4 and I find it too long to use indoors with my D90.

Ideas on selling it and getting a 35mm 1.8?

[RCubed]

I have a 50mm 1.4 and I find it too long to use indoors with my D90.

Ideas on selling it and getting a 35mm 1.8?

Highly recommend.
I love my 35mm, how its close to what you see.
I have like.. 6 manual 50mm's but the 35 is perfect for a crop body.

[LiquidTurbo]

I've been thinking of getting the 35mm f1.4 for use on the D7000 :fullofwin: lol. somebody talk some sense into me.. that lens is just so sexy..

[insomniac]

im trying to sell my 50mm 1.4g for a 35mm right now.
just waiting for a cheap used one to pop up on craigslist :p

[ForbiddenX]

you might have better luck finding one on fredmiranda they go for like <$200 there

[w00tgasm]

im trying to sell my 50mm 1.4g for a 35mm right now.
just waiting for a cheap used one to pop up on craigslist :p

I was thinking of selling my Nikon 24-70 for the 50mm 1.4G and 85 1.4.

I'd keep the zoom lens if I had a money tree though haha

[Senna4ever]

FYI, the Nikon 24-70 f2.8 is sharper than the 50mm f1.4G at all apertures. I would keep the 24-70 f2.8 unless you need the wide aperture of the 50mm.

[FX35]

http://www.gs2you.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/000013.jpg

I am looking into shooting models, with emphasis on portraiting long, slender legs. Such as the sample photo above.

Can someone advise what specific lense(s) from Nikon I should consider getting, when using a D7000?

[Volvoman]

fyi, the Nikon 35mm 1.8G is $249 at Blacks.

Time to price match my $10 back.

[w00tgasm]

FYI, the Nikon 24-70 f2.8 is sharper than the 50mm f1.4G at all apertures. I would keep the 24-70 f2.8 unless you need the wide aperture of the 50mm.

Then something is up with my 24-70. I am testing the 50 1.4G and it appears to be sharper at f8 and f11.. The only apertures I tried that day.

Could be the luck of the draw and I'll have to figure it out later tonight.

[insomniac]

FYI, the Nikon 24-70 f2.8 is sharper than the 50mm f1.4G at all apertures. I would keep the 24-70 f2.8 unless you need the wide aperture of the 50mm.

lol damn i cant imagine how sharp the 24-70 is. my 1.4 is super sharp at all apertures
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6022/5976378689_9e38456c4d_b.jpg

[Senna4ever]

Then something is up with my 24-70. I am testing the 50 1.4G and it appears to be sharper at f8 and f11.. The only apertures I tried that day.

Could be the luck of the draw and I'll have to figure it out later tonight.

lol damn i cant imagine how sharp the 24-70 is. my 1.4 is super sharp at all apertures
http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6022/5976378689_9e38456c4d_b.jpg
I have 6 of the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8 lenses, and they are all consistently sharper than our 50mm f1.4G. Maybe we have a shitty copy of the 50mm...it's possible. Of course, there are many variables that come into play too, unless you have a controlled environment.

[w00tgasm]

I've decided to return the 50mm in favor of the 24-70. I'll probably just end up selling my D300 soon and see what the D700 goes for when it gets discontinued.

[Senna4ever]

If you have a sharp copy of the 50mm, why not keep it? I think it's a sweet lens on a FF body.

[insomniac]

Hey guys, Sorta in a dilemma.
Looking to buy a new lens soon but I cant decide which one.
I currently have a 50mm f1.4g, 35-70mm f2.8 and a 16mm f2.8 fisheye.
I need a wider lens because 35 isn't wide enough. I can only afford to get one lens right now. Should I get a tokina 16-50 f2.8 lens or should I get a tokina 12-24 f4 or a tokina 11-16 f2.8? Im thinking of selling the 1.4g to get a 35mm + 12-24. Or is getting the 16-50 the best choice because I dont have an all arounder? I know most of you shoot primes but I shoot events quite a bit so switching lens is quite inconvenient for me. Will shooting people with a 12-24 stretch their faces? Let me know, thanks in advance!
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[RCubed]

Get a 24-70. Im picking up one in the near near future :)

[insomniac]

out of my budget :( i wish i was balling like you :( i can get a 12-24 + 17-50 for the price of that lolol

[w00tgasm]

If you have a sharp copy of the 50mm, why not keep it? I think it's a sweet lens on a FF body.

Because I borrowed it from my store.
I can buy it from the EPP for much less :D

[Senna4ever]

Do you work at a camera store?
EPP?

[w00tgasm]

Employee purchase price

[bigzz786786]

im soon to be purchasing a 60d, and currently i have a kit lens 18-55 is, and i have a tamron 18-270 pzd vc

im thinking im going to need something sharper, so im wondering if a 15-85mm is, and a 70-200 f/4L is a good combo to keep me pleased for some time

any advice?

btw, im not made of loads of money, so best bang for the buck is what im after

also i take more into all around photography, scenic (landscape and urban), wild life, portrait, and sports (mostly wanting to try rolling shots)

[Senna4ever]

I think that's a great kit to have. My sharpness obsessed co-worker has those lenses, but with the 7D body. Later on, you can add a wide aperture prime to your kit.

[LiquidTurbo]

Anyone got the Nikon 70-300mm VR? Like it? Hate it? Compared to the 55-300mm VR?

[Senna4ever]

For anyone with a micro 4/3 camera, I just tested the new Leica 25mm f1.4 and it is incredibly sharp!
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[seakrait]

looking to pick up a new lens for my d80. wide angle, specifically for an upcoming trip to Europe.

new: Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f3.5-4.5 Di II - $550ish?

or used: Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM
BNIB New Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM lens for nikon (http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/van/pho/2566105480.html) - this guy's asking for $500

:D

or Tokina AT-X Pro SD 12-24mm F4 (IF) DX II? :p

[insomniac]

I've seen used 10-20 sigmas for $400. :p
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[seakrait]

I've seen used 10-20 sigmas for $400. :p
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)
links? :fullofwin:


:p

[Euro7r]

links? :fullofwin:


:p

I'd sell you my Nikon 18-35mm if you are interested. I barely use it.

[Jsunu]

Any one have the Canon EF 28mm 2.8 lens? Since i have a cropped sensor I was thinking of using this as my walk around prime. Any thoughts?

http://www.memoryexpress.com/Products/PID-MX23647%28ME%29.aspx

[K-Dub]

Any one have the Canon EF 28mm 2.8 lens? Since i have a cropped sensor I was thinking of using this as my walk around prime. Any thoughts?

Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 at Memory Express Computers (http://www.memoryexpress.com/Products/PID-MX23647%28ME%29.aspx)
I would suggest the Sigma 24 1.8 instead as a walkaround lens.

Since I got it, it hasn't been taken off my 7D and I love it.

FM Reviews - Sigma 24mm f1.8 EX DG Aspherical Macro (http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=126)

Flickr: Sigma24f1.8 (http://www.flickr.com/groups/sigma24f18/)

It's a strange lens, big but light, wide but also works as a macro, and it's super fast at f1.8.

[Shead]

Canon 70-200 f4L non-IS and IS version, is it a big difference? i was thinking about the 70-200mm but would IS really be that important?

[gars]

the 70-200 F4L - the IS version is actually sharper - but the IS itself actually makes a big difference if you're going to be shooting handheld. Not everyone has a steady hand that can shoot 200mm without IS - even during daytime.

But the price difference is quite high. on the used market - the non-IS version goes for about $600, while the IS version is about $1100. So it really depends on how much you want to spend. You can buy a used non-IS version first and see how you feel about it, and sell it later on if you want to upgrade.

The IS version is also weather sealed - which might mean it would last a little longer in the elements.

[seakrait]

I'd sell you my Nikon 18-35mm if you are interested. I barely use it.

hrmmm.. i was hoping to pick up something wider than that. but that being said, how much are you askin'? :)

[Euro7r]

hrmmm.. i was hoping to pick up something wider than that. but that being said, how much are you askin'? :)

Asking for $350. Pm-ed you.

[N.V.M.]

not a lens, but it goes on one!


http://store.uniquephoto.com/e/media/catalog/product/f/i/file_64_1.jpg

trying it out now, hopefully it'll do what my gray card does, but so much easier.

[Senna4ever]

^^^^ doesn't that give you a white balance? A grey card is more for getting the proper exposure.

[N.V.M.]

By using a grey card, the camera can be set to a true white balance, resulting in a more accurate recording of all the colours.The older photographic grey cards are not suitable because they are not neutral enough. They were used for judging exposure rather than judging a white balance and colour neutrality.

About a Grey Card (http://www.photoshop-tutorials-plus.com/grey-card.html)


now, i didn't know that about the card being used for exposure, i've always solely used it for white balancing. but i tend to get lazy and go through the process, forgetting to take it with me, etc.

[seakrait]

looking to pick up a new lens for my d80. wide angle, specifically for an upcoming trip to Europe.

new: Tamron SP AF 10-24mm f3.5-4.5 Di II - $550ish?

or used: Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM
BNIB New Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 EX DC HSM lens for nikon (http://vancouver.en.craigslist.ca/van/pho/2566105480.html) - this guy's asking for $500 (new $600)

:D

or Tokina AT-X Pro SD 12-24mm F4 (IF) DX II (new 660)? :p

still undecided. anyone have an opinion?

[-EuroRSN-]

Does anyone have experience with the Sigma 17-70 OS? Been thinking of either that or the Canon 15-85, from what i hear both very similar.. Except the Canon is double the price lol.

[LiquidTurbo]

^ Sigma 17-50mm OS is better than the 17-70mm, try it out!

[-EuroRSN-]

True its a constant 2.8 but i need more of an upgrade in focal length for a more general purpose lens. The more research i do it seems that the Canon 15-85 is far more superior in sharpness. Time to save up...

[giCe]

Fro those interested, Memory Express currently has Canon 17-85mm IS USM F4-5.6 for sale at $350.00
Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM at Memory Express Computers (http://www.memoryexpress.com/Products/PID-MX12494(ME).aspx?cc=1)

[bigzz786786]

hey guys, quick update, i got my 60d and canon 70-200 f4L IS! so happy right now!

t first i was gonna get the 15-85 is, but now im thinking about the 17-40 f4L, what are your thoughts? which is sharper?

also planning on a 50mm 1.4

[LP700-4]

Im looking for a telephoto zoom lens, any suggestions? Camera is a T2i

[ddr]

Im looking for a telephoto zoom lens, any suggestions? Camera is a T2i

depends on your budget. 55-250, 70-300 is usm, any of the canon 70-200

[LP700-4]

Best for the price is what I'm looking for haha gonna keep my eye out for one
Posted via RS Mobile (http://www.revscene.net/forums/announcement.php?a=228)

[Senna4ever]

The new 70-300L is amazing, if you have the budget for it.

[gdoh]

looking for suggestions for a digital camera (canon) for no more than 300$ all in need it asap

TIA

[Alatar]

looking for suggestions for a digital camera (canon) for no more than 300$ all in need it asap

TIA

You want this thread (http://www.revscene.net/forums/506651-looking-buy-new-camera-ask-here.html).

[AWDTurboLuvr]

Looking for a versatile travel lens for my D90...thinking about the 16-85VR. Any thoughts for or against it? Tests look pretty good.

[-EuroRSN-]

^ i was actually just looking into this lens as well for a D7000 but from what i read and the guy told me from BC its very similar to the 18-105 VR. Differences are not very significant and ur pretty much paying for the 16mm..

[Senna4ever]

The 18-105VR is decent too.

[AWDTurboLuvr]

^ i was actually just looking into this lens as well for a D7000 but from what i read and the guy told me from BC its very similar to the 18-105 VR. Differences are not very significant and ur pretty much paying for the 16mm..

Interesting...I've used a 18-105 before and the images, at least on that copy weren't that sharp. The reviews on the 16-85 give great ratings on sharpness (corners were a bit darker, but it's a zoom lens for the consumer level, so I can live with that). I'll have to visit BC and try it out tomorrow. What about that Sigma 17-50? Perhaps it's a bit too heavy for a travel lens?

[Shead]

consider purchasing the canon 24-70mm f2.8 L lens as a walk-around lens, but it does not come with IS, also considering the canon 24-105mm f4 with IS.... i really love to 2 extra stops, but is it worth not having IS? i've read some ppl whom bought the 2.8 complain about it not being sharp, maybe due to their shaky hands? What are your outputs guys?

[insomniac]

Interesting...I've used a 18-105 before and the images, at least on that copy weren't that sharp. The reviews on the 16-85 give great ratings on sharpness (corners were a bit darker, but it's a zoom lens for the consumer level, so I can live with that). I'll have to visit BC and try it out tomorrow. What about that Sigma 17-50? Perhaps it's a bit too heavy for a travel lens?

Focusing samples Nikon 16-85 vs 18-200 vs Sigma 18-50 f2.8: Nikon SLR Lens Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review (http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1030&message=27999828)

i think i would go with the 17-50. it has fixed 2.8 too. it shouldnt be too heavy, i had a 17-70 a while back and it was pretty light

[ilvtofu]

Does anyone have experience with the Sigma 17-70 OS? Been thinking of either that or the Canon 15-85, from what i hear both very similar.. Except the Canon is double the price lol.

I have the sigma 17-70 F2.8-4.0 OS HSM Macro on my 7D. I'm pretty happy with it and it's an incredibly easy lens to use. The minimum focus distance makes it really practical for stuff like food photography. IMO it's a pretty sharp lens and with the OS on I've taken portraits at speeds as slow as 1/5 without any problems. There is a big difference between the 2.8-4.0 and the 2.8-4.5 though, dont be fooled!

[N.V.M.]

There is a big difference between the 2.8-4.0 and the 2.8-4.5 though, dont be fooled!


the 2.8-4.5 is about 1/2 the price, he should be safe. There's a Canon version of this lens, just called a 2.8(17-70mm OS), and its even way more than the 2-8-4.0

[Senna4ever]

consider purchasing the canon 24-70mm f2.8 L lens as a walk-around lens, but it does not come with IS, also considering the canon 24-105mm f4 with IS.... i really love to 2 extra stops, but is it worth not having IS? i've read some ppl whom bought the 2.8 complain about it not being sharp, maybe due to their shaky hands? What are your outputs guys?
The 24-70 has one extra stop over the 24-105. I think the 24-105 is a good walkaround/travel lens, but I wouldn't use it professionally - I find the f4 aperture too limiting. Both lenses are a bit soft, but they will output sharp 16x20 prints, maybe 20x24 as long as you have optimum focus & exposure. I think for most people, the 24-105 is a better choice, but if you do a lot of people shots indoors, the f2.8 aperture of the 24-70 might come in handy, as the IS does not compensate for subject movement. The 24-70 is a bit of a pig, as it's big & heavy.

[bigzz786786]

does anybody have any experience with the 17-40 f4L?

im wanting to purchase a good sharp walk around lens lens but still be reasonable in price

i already have a 70-200 f4L IS, so i need something for the shorter range

any other suggestions? right now i have a 60d but i plan to eventually move to FF

[xeryusx]

Looking for a beginner-intermediate wide-angle lens for T3i, thx!


Canon EF 28mm f2.8?

[-EuroRSN-]

^ well the cheapest and best is the sigma 10-22mm. You still gonna spend near $600 or less if u find used. Or you can also go for a general purpose 15-85 USM but thats like $1000 and cost more then the T3i it self... Fuck why are lenses so damn expensive :( Time to save up

[Cereal Killer]

Edit: Oops. Wrong thread haha :blush:

[Jegz]

How much can i get for selling my lens that came with my d5100?