REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-24-2012, 03:29 PM   #1
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: bedroom
Posts: 3,112
Thanked 3,492 Times in 1,176 Posts
Failed 441 Times in 145 Posts
Vancouver man pleads guilty to bestiality

Global BC | Guilty plea expected by Vancouver man facing bestiality charge

This is fucking sick! Worst of all, he is a "vocal opponent" of bestiality laws!

Check out his fb account (namely his photo albums):

Brian Cutteridge | Facebook
Advertisement
dinosaur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 03:46 PM   #2
First to fail !SG evar! Now i have yellow fever...
 
Redlines_Daily's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,482
Thanked 2,431 Times in 475 Posts
Failed 358 Times in 115 Posts
I have no problem with him being a vocal opponent to bestiality laws. The law states that sex with animals cause distress and harm, but I think it needs to be proven case-by-case. A blanket law that states all sexual acts cause harm and comes with a mandatory sentence is unjust. I saw a weird ass porn where a girl was jerking off a horse..Im sure the horse enjoyed it and there was no distress there.

Anyway, not many people would speak up because they dont want to be labeled as someone who's into bestiality. Just saying that I think they need to prove that it was harmful to the animals before they give a mandatory sentence.

I think this guy(and others who are into that kind of thing) probably need some sexual counseling, not jail time.
Redlines_Daily is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-24-2012, 03:53 PM   #3
Banned By Establishment
 
Iceman-19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 9,521
Thanked 1,289 Times in 409 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 100 Posts
In some places in the world, anal sex is still illegal. Not everyone does it, or admits to doing it, but is it really that bad? If its consentual, then no. Not really a fan of animal sex, but hey, if the guy enjoys it, and hes not hurting his pet, harm is where?
Iceman-19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 03:55 PM   #4
Need to Seek Professional Help
 
Eastwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,028
Thanked 436 Times in 92 Posts
Failed 292 Times in 68 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redlines_Daily View Post
I have no problem with him being a vocal opponent to bestiality laws. The law states that sex with animals cause distress and harm, but I think it needs to be proven case-by-case. A blanket law that states all sexual acts cause harm and comes with a mandatory sentence is unjust. I saw a weird ass porn where a girl was jerking off a horse..Im sure the horse enjoyed it and there was no distress there.

Anyway, not many people would speak up because they dont want to be labeled as someone who's into bestiality. Just saying that I think they need to prove that it was harmful to the animals before they give a mandatory sentence.

I think this guy(and others who are into that kind of thing) probably need some sexual counseling, not jail time.
No he needs jail time. Dogs don't want humans.
Eastwood is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 09-24-2012, 03:59 PM   #5
My bookmarks are Reddit and REVscene, in that order
 
Culverin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,442
Thanked 13,465 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 1,625 Times in 307 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastwood View Post
No he needs jail time. Dogs don't want humans.
You've never had a dog try and hump your leg?
I have.
__________________
***Sarlo's Awesome Eatery ***
Facebook // Instagram
Culverin is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-24-2012, 04:16 PM   #6
I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
 
hchang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastwood View Post
No he needs jail time. Dogs don't want humans.
Did a dog tell you that personally?

Its all theory. No one can prove it right or wrong.
Posted via RS Mobile
hchang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 04:30 PM   #7
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Richmond
Posts: 878
Thanked 421 Times in 186 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastwood View Post
No he needs jail time. Dogs don't want humans.
What good will come of putting him in prison?
BillyBishop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 04:33 PM   #8
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Langley
Posts: 4,218
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,334 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang View Post
Did a dog tell you that personally?

Its all theory. No one can prove it right or wrong.
Posted via RS Mobile
Yeah well a human baby can't say anything either is that implied consent too? A loyal dog will let you beat the shit out of it and still won't bite you, so saying the animal is fine with it for not putting up some sort of fight isn't a great argument.
Posted via RS Mobile
MarkyMark is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-24-2012, 04:38 PM   #9
I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
 
hchang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark View Post
Yeah well a human baby can't say anything either is that implied consent too? A loyal dog will let you beat the shit out of it and still won't bite you, so saying the animal is fine with it for not putting up some sort of fight isn't a great argument.
Posted via RS Mobile

A baby will cry. Animals may or may not make an attempt to get away.

You're comparing apples to oranges, human beings have more laws protecting us. You can kill an ant and get away with it. If you kill a human being you're gonna get charged.
Posted via RS Mobile
hchang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 04:42 PM   #10
In RS I Trust
 
murd0c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mission
Posts: 20,785
Thanked 17,663 Times in 4,346 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyBishop View Post
What good will come of putting him in prison?
cause he will be treated like an animal in prison
murd0c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 04:46 PM   #11
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Langley
Posts: 4,218
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,334 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang View Post
A baby will cry. Animals may or may not make an attempt to get away.

You're comparing apples to oranges, human beings have more laws protecting us. You can kill an ant and get away with it. If you kill a human being you're gonna get charged.
Posted via RS Mobile
So if the baby doesn't cry then it's all good right?

This is retarded logic, there are plenty of laws protecting animals, you can't just kill a dog like an ant and get away with it. I don't see this as apples to oranges, to me this shit is disgusting and just assuming the animal is all good with it seems messed up. Anyways that's my take I'll leave it at that.
Posted via RS Mobile
MarkyMark is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-24-2012, 04:49 PM   #12
Banned By Establishment
 
Gridlock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New West
Posts: 3,998
Thanked 2,982 Times in 1,135 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 109 Posts
Well this thread went in a direction that I didn't expect...
Gridlock is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-24-2012, 04:50 PM   #13
ESKETIT
 
Vansterdam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Shambhala
Posts: 23,364
Thanked 9,698 Times in 2,328 Posts
Failed 998 Times in 241 Posts
Ha-Ha! Well now we call this the act of mating
But there are several other very important differences
Between human beings and animals that you should know about




You and me baby ain't nothin' but mammals
So let's do it like they do on the Discovery Channel
Do it again now
You and me baby ain't nothin' but mammals
So let's do it like they do on the Discovery Channel
Gettin' horny now

Vansterdam is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-24-2012, 05:10 PM   #14
I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
 
hchang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark View Post
So if the baby doesn't cry then it's all good right?

This is retarded logic, there are plenty of laws protecting animals, you can't just kill a dog like an ant and get away with it. I don't see this as apples to oranges, to me this shit is disgusting and just assuming the animal is all good with it seems messed up. Anyways that's my take I'll leave it at that.
Posted via RS Mobile
Okay well let's not compare it Humans vs. Ants and put it in your perspective; What species has more laws protecting them? Humans or Dogs/Animals?

Don't get me wrong, I find bestiality absolutely disgusting as well but my one and only point is that its only theory that animals don't enjoy it (or vice versa)
Posted via RS Mobile
hchang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 05:16 PM   #15
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Langley
Posts: 4,218
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,334 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang View Post
Okay well let's not compare it Humans vs. Ants and put it in your perspective; What species has more laws protecting them? Humans or Dogs/Animals?

Don't get me wrong, I find bestiality absolutely disgusting as well but my one and only point is that its only theory that animals don't enjoy it (or vice versa)
Posted via RS Mobile
My point is that you can't prove an animal likes or dislikes it any more than a baby can, so why should it suddenly be based upon whether or not you think the animal likes it? Have we really stooped so low as the human race to start fucking animals and call it ok in the name of freedom? I'm down with the gay movement and all that but this is just a few notches too much for me.
Posted via RS Mobile
MarkyMark is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 05:25 PM   #16
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: richmond
Posts: 2,837
Thanked 1,490 Times in 570 Posts
Failed 172 Times in 64 Posts
Did you see the way that bitch looked at me.........
Date rape at the doggy park.
This law has religious undertones its been around forever long before people gave a damn about the fair and just treatment of animals. I for one think its right and just in being implemented as it allows society to err on the side of caution (with humane treatment of animals) and for fucks sake why does anyone need to fuck an animal!?
__________________
Rise Auto Salon

11938 95a Ave Delta
I can be reached VIA text @ 778-232-1465

Oil change special $70 5 liters synthetic oil including OEM filter Fender rolling from $45 per fender
Car Audio:
Focal, Morel, Genesis, Clarion, Scosche, Escort, Compustar, GReddy, Blitz, Tomei, Motul, Endless, Defi, Cusco, Nismo + More


We specialize in:
Custom Car Audio
Race/4x4 Fabrication
Forced Induction
Engine Swaps
General Maintenance
Phil@rise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 05:47 PM   #17
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: bedroom
Posts: 3,112
Thanked 3,492 Times in 1,176 Posts
Failed 441 Times in 145 Posts
Well, even the article said the likelihood of jail time is slim. I am thinking it will be probation and a lifetime ban on owning animals.

The creepy weird part was him taping it.

Last edited by dinosaur; 09-25-2012 at 10:09 AM.
dinosaur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 05:55 PM   #18
I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
 
hchang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark View Post
My point is that you can't prove an animal likes or dislikes it any more than a baby can, so why should it suddenly be based upon whether or not you think the animal likes it? Have we really stooped so low as the human race to start fucking animals and call it ok in the name of freedom? I'm down with the gay movement and all that but this is just a few notches too much for me.
Posted via RS Mobile
You can. Humans and Dogs alike both show emotions.

If you try something on a baby, they will cry. Not speaking from personal experience of course, but with common sense I can almost guarantee it.

Whereas a dog would, again with common sense judgment, either sit there and take it, or run away instantly. Whether you forcefully hold it is a whole other story.
Posted via RS Mobile
hchang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 05:56 PM   #19
My homepage has been set to RS
 
drunkrussian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,308
Thanked 825 Times in 341 Posts
Failed 203 Times in 77 Posts
i fuck bitches all the time
Posted via RS Mobile
drunkrussian is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-24-2012, 06:07 PM   #20
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Langley
Posts: 4,218
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,334 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang View Post
You can. Humans and Dogs alike both show emotions.

If you try something on a baby, they will cry. Not speaking from personal experience of course, but with common sense I can almost guarantee it.

Whereas a dog would, again with common sense judgment, either sit there and take it, or run away instantly. Whether you forcefully hold it is a whole other story.
Posted via RS Mobile
Once again, retarded logic. You're basically saying a baby will cry any time you touch it inappropriately, but if it doesn't its ok. Just like if a dog doesn't run away, then it's ok with it.

Basically anything should be legal as long as the other person doesn't run away or cry. This logic is a pedo's wet dream. "Your honor, they didn't say anything so it's all good right?"
Posted via RS Mobile
MarkyMark is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-24-2012, 06:25 PM   #21
I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
 
hchang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark View Post
Once again, retarded logic. You're basically saying a baby will cry any time you touc

h it inappropriately, but if it doesn't its ok. Just like if a dog doesn't run away, then it's ok with it.

Basically anything should be legal as long as the other person doesn't run away or cry. This logic is a pedo's wet dream. "Your honor, they didn't say anything so it's all good right?"
Posted via RS Mobile
"Touching inappropriately" is night and day different from bestiality.

Sorry to paint this picture in everybodys head but if you try to do the "gesture of bestiality" to a baby, its not going to fit, therefore causing pain, which will always cause a baby to cry.

I'm not saying "if they don't cry its okay" but there's a HUGE difference between a baby and a dog. The animals in question for bestiality are not the baby animals. People and animals after a certain age will be able to make judgement calls on their own.
Posted via RS Mobile
hchang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 06:37 PM   #22
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Langley
Posts: 4,218
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,334 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang View Post
"Touching inappropriately" is night and day different from bestiality.

Sorry to paint this picture in everybodys head but if you try to do the "gesture of bestiality" to a baby, its not going to fit, therefore causing pain, which will always cause a baby to cry.

I'm not saying "if they don't cry its okay" but there's a HUGE difference between a baby and a dog. The animals in question for bestiality are not the baby animals. People and animals after a certain age will be able to make judgement calls on their own.
Posted via RS Mobile
There's no choice being given to an animal here lol, how are you going to enforce this, have an officer came watch the dude fuck his dog and then say "yep she really looks like she's fine with it while you pounded her from behind, here's your license to have sex with this dog"
Posted via RS Mobile
MarkyMark is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 06:55 PM   #23
I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
 
hchang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark View Post
There's no choice being given to an animal here lol, how are you going to enforce this, have an officer came watch the dude fuck his dog and then say "yep she really looks like she's fine with it while you pounded her from behind, here's your license to have sex with this dog"
Posted via RS Mobile
There is choice: an animal is able to run away if they don't like what they feel (unless you forcefully hold them). Whereas a baby is not able to "run away".
Posted via RS Mobile
hchang is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 09-24-2012, 06:58 PM   #24
Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
 
z3german's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,116
Thanked 903 Times in 285 Posts
Failed 182 Times in 32 Posts
his pictures are pretty creepy LOL but looks like the dog loves him so eh.

+1 on just counselling.
z3german is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2012, 07:07 PM   #25
Wanna have a threesome?
 
MindBomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,889
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 203 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark View Post
There's no choice being given to an animal here lol, how are you going to enforce this, have an officer came watch the dude fuck his dog and then say "yep she really looks like she's fine with it while you pounded her from behind, here's your license to have sex with this dog"
Posted via RS Mobile
Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang View Post
Did a dog tell you that personally?

Its all theory. No one can prove it right or wrong.
Posted via RS Mobile
hchang is echoing the position of Peter Singer, MarkyMark is echoing the position of Tom Regan; both very well recognized contemporary philosophers who have debated the topic of zoophilia/bestiality. The sex with children argument is the exact counter given by Regan to Singer's position that sex with animals is morally allowable.

Singer's position is stronger, imo.

If the horse receiving a HJ from a female in the video watched by RedlinesDaily did not enjoy the act, he could easily protested and prevented it. The horse did not protest, therefore he was a willingly participating. The only thing that makes it wrong according to law and some members of society is because it is sexual, we're allowed to jerk off horses to collect semen for IVF and such. That means the argument that it is rape-like is inconsistent, so the sexual element is the only issue. So, why is it wrong to sexualize animals? Dogs do it to people, as cited by Culverins leg humping example.

A human child cannot physically protest the act and prevent it, therefore it would equate to being non-consensual and rape.

Last edited by MindBomber; 09-24-2012 at 07:15 PM.
MindBomber is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net