Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum. |  | |
09-24-2012, 03:46 PM
|
#2 | First to fail !SG evar! Now i have yellow fever...
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,482
Thanked 2,431 Times in 475 Posts
Failed 358 Times in 115 Posts
|
I have no problem with him being a vocal opponent to bestiality laws. The law states that sex with animals cause distress and harm, but I think it needs to be proven case-by-case. A blanket law that states all sexual acts cause harm and comes with a mandatory sentence is unjust. I saw a weird ass porn where a girl was jerking off a horse..Im sure the horse enjoyed it and there was no distress there.
Anyway, not many people would speak up because they dont want to be labeled as someone who's into bestiality. Just saying that I think they need to prove that it was harmful to the animals before they give a mandatory sentence.
I think this guy(and others who are into that kind of thing) probably need some sexual counseling, not jail time.
|
| |
09-24-2012, 03:53 PM
|
#3 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 9,521
Thanked 1,289 Times in 409 Posts
Failed 407 Times in 100 Posts
|
In some places in the world, anal sex is still illegal. Not everyone does it, or admits to doing it, but is it really that bad? If its consentual, then no. Not really a fan of animal sex, but hey, if the guy enjoys it, and hes not hurting his pet, harm is where?
|
| |
09-24-2012, 03:55 PM
|
#4 | Need to Seek Professional Help
Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,028
Thanked 436 Times in 92 Posts
Failed 292 Times in 68 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Redlines_Daily I have no problem with him being a vocal opponent to bestiality laws. The law states that sex with animals cause distress and harm, but I think it needs to be proven case-by-case. A blanket law that states all sexual acts cause harm and comes with a mandatory sentence is unjust. I saw a weird ass porn where a girl was jerking off a horse..Im sure the horse enjoyed it and there was no distress there.
Anyway, not many people would speak up because they dont want to be labeled as someone who's into bestiality. Just saying that I think they need to prove that it was harmful to the animals before they give a mandatory sentence.
I think this guy(and others who are into that kind of thing) probably need some sexual counseling, not jail time. | No he needs jail time. Dogs don't want humans.
|
| |
09-24-2012, 03:59 PM
|
#5 | My bookmarks are Reddit and REVscene, in that order
Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,442
Thanked 13,465 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 1,625 Times in 307 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastwood No he needs jail time. Dogs don't want humans. | You've never had a dog try and hump your leg?
I have.
|
| |
09-24-2012, 04:16 PM
|
#6 | I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastwood No he needs jail time. Dogs don't want humans. | Did a dog tell you that personally?
Its all theory. No one can prove it right or wrong. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 04:30 PM
|
#7 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Richmond
Posts: 878
Thanked 421 Times in 186 Posts
Failed 7 Times in 6 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastwood No he needs jail time. Dogs don't want humans. | What good will come of putting him in prison?
|
| |
09-24-2012, 04:33 PM
|
#8 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Langley
Posts: 4,218
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,334 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang Did a dog tell you that personally?
Its all theory. No one can prove it right or wrong. Posted via RS Mobile | Yeah well a human baby can't say anything either is that implied consent too? A loyal dog will let you beat the shit out of it and still won't bite you, so saying the animal is fine with it for not putting up some sort of fight isn't a great argument. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 04:38 PM
|
#9 | I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark Yeah well a human baby can't say anything either is that implied consent too? A loyal dog will let you beat the shit out of it and still won't bite you, so saying the animal is fine with it for not putting up some sort of fight isn't a great argument. Posted via RS Mobile |
A baby will cry. Animals may or may not make an attempt to get away.
You're comparing apples to oranges, human beings have more laws protecting us. You can kill an ant and get away with it. If you kill a human being you're gonna get charged. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 04:42 PM
|
#10 | In RS I Trust
Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Mission
Posts: 20,785
Thanked 17,663 Times in 4,346 Posts
Failed 1,037 Times in 352 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyBishop What good will come of putting him in prison? | cause he will be treated like an animal in prison |
| |
09-24-2012, 04:46 PM
|
#11 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Langley
Posts: 4,218
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,334 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang A baby will cry. Animals may or may not make an attempt to get away.
You're comparing apples to oranges, human beings have more laws protecting us. You can kill an ant and get away with it. If you kill a human being you're gonna get charged. Posted via RS Mobile | So if the baby doesn't cry then it's all good right?
This is retarded logic, there are plenty of laws protecting animals, you can't just kill a dog like an ant and get away with it. I don't see this as apples to oranges, to me this shit is disgusting and just assuming the animal is all good with it seems messed up. Anyways that's my take I'll leave it at that. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 04:49 PM
|
#12 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: New West
Posts: 3,998
Thanked 2,982 Times in 1,135 Posts
Failed 284 Times in 109 Posts
|
Well this thread went in a direction that I didn't expect...
|
| |
09-24-2012, 04:50 PM
|
#13 | ESKETIT
Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Shambhala
Posts: 23,364
Thanked 9,698 Times in 2,328 Posts
Failed 998 Times in 241 Posts
|
Ha-Ha! Well now we call this the act of mating
But there are several other very important differences
Between human beings and animals that you should know about
You and me baby ain't nothin' but mammals
So let's do it like they do on the Discovery Channel
Do it again now
You and me baby ain't nothin' but mammals
So let's do it like they do on the Discovery Channel
Gettin' horny now |
| |
09-24-2012, 05:10 PM
|
#14 | I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark So if the baby doesn't cry then it's all good right?
This is retarded logic, there are plenty of laws protecting animals, you can't just kill a dog like an ant and get away with it. I don't see this as apples to oranges, to me this shit is disgusting and just assuming the animal is all good with it seems messed up. Anyways that's my take I'll leave it at that. Posted via RS Mobile | Okay well let's not compare it Humans vs. Ants and put it in your perspective; What species has more laws protecting them? Humans or Dogs/Animals?
Don't get me wrong, I find bestiality absolutely disgusting as well but my one and only point is that its only theory that animals don't enjoy it (or vice versa) Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 05:16 PM
|
#15 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Langley
Posts: 4,218
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,334 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang Okay well let's not compare it Humans vs. Ants and put it in your perspective; What species has more laws protecting them? Humans or Dogs/Animals?
Don't get me wrong, I find bestiality absolutely disgusting as well but my one and only point is that its only theory that animals don't enjoy it (or vice versa) Posted via RS Mobile | My point is that you can't prove an animal likes or dislikes it any more than a baby can, so why should it suddenly be based upon whether or not you think the animal likes it? Have we really stooped so low as the human race to start fucking animals and call it ok in the name of freedom? I'm down with the gay movement and all that but this is just a few notches too much for me. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 05:25 PM
|
#16 | I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: richmond
Posts: 2,837
Thanked 1,490 Times in 570 Posts
Failed 172 Times in 64 Posts
|
Did you see the way that bitch looked at me.........
Date rape at the doggy park.
This law has religious undertones its been around forever long before people gave a damn about the fair and just treatment of animals. I for one think its right and just in being implemented as it allows society to err on the side of caution (with humane treatment of animals) and for fucks sake why does anyone need to fuck an animal!?
__________________ Rise Auto Salon
11938 95a Ave Delta
I can be reached VIA text @ 778-232-1465 Oil change special $70 5 liters synthetic oil including OEM filter Fender rolling from $45 per fender Car Audio:
Focal, Morel, Genesis, Clarion, Scosche, Escort, Compustar, GReddy, Blitz, Tomei, Motul, Endless, Defi, Cusco, Nismo + More
We specialize in:
Custom Car Audio
Race/4x4 Fabrication
Forced Induction
Engine Swaps
General Maintenance |
| |
09-24-2012, 05:47 PM
|
#17 | Banned By Establishment
Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: bedroom
Posts: 3,112
Thanked 3,492 Times in 1,176 Posts
Failed 441 Times in 145 Posts
|
Well, even the article said the likelihood of jail time is slim. I am thinking it will be probation and a lifetime ban on owning animals.
The creepy weird part was him taping it.
Last edited by dinosaur; 09-25-2012 at 10:09 AM.
|
| |
09-24-2012, 05:55 PM
|
#18 | I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark My point is that you can't prove an animal likes or dislikes it any more than a baby can, so why should it suddenly be based upon whether or not you think the animal likes it? Have we really stooped so low as the human race to start fucking animals and call it ok in the name of freedom? I'm down with the gay movement and all that but this is just a few notches too much for me. Posted via RS Mobile | You can. Humans and Dogs alike both show emotions.
If you try something on a baby, they will cry. Not speaking from personal experience of course, but with common sense I can almost guarantee it.
Whereas a dog would, again with common sense judgment, either sit there and take it, or run away instantly. Whether you forcefully hold it is a whole other story. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 05:56 PM
|
#19 | My homepage has been set to RS
Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,308
Thanked 825 Times in 341 Posts
Failed 203 Times in 77 Posts
|
i fuck bitches all the time Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 06:07 PM
|
#20 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Langley
Posts: 4,218
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,334 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang You can. Humans and Dogs alike both show emotions.
If you try something on a baby, they will cry. Not speaking from personal experience of course, but with common sense I can almost guarantee it.
Whereas a dog would, again with common sense judgment, either sit there and take it, or run away instantly. Whether you forcefully hold it is a whole other story. Posted via RS Mobile | Once again, retarded logic. You're basically saying a baby will cry any time you touch it inappropriately, but if it doesn't its ok. Just like if a dog doesn't run away, then it's ok with it.
Basically anything should be legal as long as the other person doesn't run away or cry. This logic is a pedo's wet dream. "Your honor, they didn't say anything so it's all good right?" Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 06:25 PM
|
#21 | I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark Once again, retarded logic. You're basically saying a baby will cry any time you touc
h it inappropriately, but if it doesn't its ok. Just like if a dog doesn't run away, then it's ok with it.
Basically anything should be legal as long as the other person doesn't run away or cry. This logic is a pedo's wet dream. "Your honor, they didn't say anything so it's all good right?" Posted via RS Mobile | "Touching inappropriately" is night and day different from bestiality.
Sorry to paint this picture in everybodys head but if you try to do the "gesture of bestiality" to a baby, its not going to fit, therefore causing pain, which will always cause a baby to cry.
I'm not saying "if they don't cry its okay" but there's a HUGE difference between a baby and a dog. The animals in question for bestiality are not the baby animals. People and animals after a certain age will be able to make judgement calls on their own. Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 06:37 PM
|
#22 | Rs has made me the woman i am today!
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Langley
Posts: 4,218
Thanked 3,518 Times in 1,334 Posts
Failed 94 Times in 72 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang "Touching inappropriately" is night and day different from bestiality.
Sorry to paint this picture in everybodys head but if you try to do the "gesture of bestiality" to a baby, its not going to fit, therefore causing pain, which will always cause a baby to cry.
I'm not saying "if they don't cry its okay" but there's a HUGE difference between a baby and a dog. The animals in question for bestiality are not the baby animals. People and animals after a certain age will be able to make judgement calls on their own. Posted via RS Mobile | There's no choice being given to an animal here lol, how are you going to enforce this, have an officer came watch the dude fuck his dog and then say "yep she really looks like she's fine with it while you pounded her from behind, here's your license to have sex with this dog" Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 06:55 PM
|
#23 | I wish I was where I was when I wished I was here
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: West Coast
Posts: 4,932
Thanked 3,098 Times in 733 Posts
Failed 703 Times in 219 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark There's no choice being given to an animal here lol, how are you going to enforce this, have an officer came watch the dude fuck his dog and then say "yep she really looks like she's fine with it while you pounded her from behind, here's your license to have sex with this dog" Posted via RS Mobile | There is choice: an animal is able to run away if they don't like what they feel (unless you forcefully hold them). Whereas a baby is not able to "run away". Posted via RS Mobile |
| |
09-24-2012, 06:58 PM
|
#24 | Where's my RS Christmas Lobster?!
Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Richmond
Posts: 1,116
Thanked 903 Times in 285 Posts
Failed 182 Times in 32 Posts
|
his pictures are pretty creepy LOL but looks like the dog loves him so eh.
+1 on just counselling.
|
| |
09-24-2012, 07:07 PM
|
#25 | Wanna have a threesome?
Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Squamish
Posts: 4,889
Thanked 5,054 Times in 1,657 Posts
Failed 439 Times in 203 Posts
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkyMark There's no choice being given to an animal here lol, how are you going to enforce this, have an officer came watch the dude fuck his dog and then say "yep she really looks like she's fine with it while you pounded her from behind, here's your license to have sex with this dog" Posted via RS Mobile | Quote:
Originally Posted by hchang Did a dog tell you that personally?
Its all theory. No one can prove it right or wrong. Posted via RS Mobile | hchang is echoing the position of Peter Singer, MarkyMark is echoing the position of Tom Regan; both very well recognized contemporary philosophers who have debated the topic of zoophilia/bestiality. The sex with children argument is the exact counter given by Regan to Singer's position that sex with animals is morally allowable.
Singer's position is stronger, imo.
If the horse receiving a HJ from a female in the video watched by RedlinesDaily did not enjoy the act, he could easily protested and prevented it. The horse did not protest, therefore he was a willingly participating. The only thing that makes it wrong according to law and some members of society is because it is sexual, we're allowed to jerk off horses to collect semen for IVF and such. That means the argument that it is rape-like is inconsistent, so the sexual element is the only issue. So, why is it wrong to sexualize animals? Dogs do it to people, as cited by Culverins leg humping example.
A human child cannot physically protest the act and prevent it, therefore it would equate to being non-consensual and rape.
Last edited by MindBomber; 09-24-2012 at 07:15 PM.
|
| |  | |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:33 AM. |