REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Computer Tech, Gaming & Electronics (https://www.revscene.net/forums/computer-tech-gaming-electronics_32/)
-   -   Official World Of Warcraft Thread (https://www.revscene.net/forums/252422-official-world-warcraft-thread.html)

Jomo 11-12-2005 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by impactX
No way a rogue can keep a mage stunlock either. Even just with decent PVP gears, a mage can never be killed 1 on 1 if he can time his barrier correctly.

A mage can lose to a priest with dots also. But again, the barrier can dispell dots can't it? Then after getting out of barrier, polymorph and run :D

Exactly, if you think you're going to lose, you can always just run.

HKS, it's not all theorycraft. I've killed many mages in group fights, and I've killed several 1v1. When it comes down to it though, a good mage will always beat an equally skilled/geared warrior. It's just a matter of not doing something dumb. If you're a frost mage, the warrior will never even be in striking range, if you're fire/arcane, you'll be able to kill him so fast after you sheep him that it's not a worry. The two talisman trinkets just seal the deal, they arent even necessary.

Narayan 11-12-2005 12:34 PM

a warrior with epic weapon from MC can 2 shot a mage... charge, hit, MS

ScizzMoney 11-12-2005 01:37 PM

We downed nefarion a couple of weeks ago :)

I find that mages are definately powerful, and shouldn't really lose to a warrior 1 vs 1. Although, if they are both geared from MC and BWL it will be a close match if the warrior isn't protection specc'd. Shadow Priest > Mage :P

Jomo 11-12-2005 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Narayan
a warrior with epic weapon from MC can 2 shot a mage... charge, hit, MS
Bullshit. Sorry.

For what it's worth, a mage without access to MC can pvp. With the blue pvp set you'll have ~4000 hp, with the purple one you'll have ~4700 hp.

I have no reason based on your points in this thread to believe you are even a half decent player. You sound like the type that complains that paladins are overpowered.

Narayan 11-12-2005 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jomo
Bullshit. Sorry.

For what it's worth, a mage without access to MC can pvp. With the blue pvp set you'll have ~4000 hp, with the purple one you'll have ~4700 hp.

I have no reason based on your points in this thread to believe you are even a half decent player. You sound like the type that complains that paladins are overpowered.

hmmm my priest with full devout and good misc gear has 2800 hp un buffed.... and to my knowledge mages dont have a STAM buff.

dealt 11-12-2005 03:18 PM

warriors are all gear kthx

i seen a mage with 1/2 arcanist down a warrior to around 200hp left with full might + sulfurus and the warrior 2 hit him rofls

Jomo 11-12-2005 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Narayan
hmmm my priest with full devout and good misc gear has 2800 hp un buffed.... and to my knowledge mages dont have a STAM buff.
Rofl

Your gear is horrible, that's why your opinion is skewed. It's MUCH easier for me to murder a priest than a mage, as a warrior. Hell, I was MS/fury spec and I could kill a priest with two daggers.

impactX 11-12-2005 04:33 PM

My 5 point coldblood evis was only able to damage this mage to around half the hp of this PVP mage. (He had like 4k hp with the PVP gear.) There was no way I could kill him even when I used preparation to pull out another 5 point CB eviscerate.

PVP gears add shitloads of hp.

Ronin 11-12-2005 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Narayan
hmmm my priest with full devout and good misc gear has 2800 hp un buffed.... and to my knowledge mages dont have a STAM buff.
I could one shot that.

Doubl3_H 11-12-2005 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Ronin
I could one shot that.
http://www.terrysgourmetcookies.com/...ages/SUGAR.jpg

RFlush 11-12-2005 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jomo

HKS, it's not all theorycraft. I've killed many mages in group fights, and I've killed several 1v1. When it comes down to it though, a good mage will always beat an equally skilled/geared warrior. It's just a matter of not doing something dumb. If you're a frost mage, the warrior will never even be in striking range, if you're fire/arcane, you'll be able to kill him so fast after you sheep him that it's not a worry. The two talisman trinkets just seal the deal, they arent even necessary.

With Lifegiving gem and the pvp trinket, a warrior would destroy the mage. Improved intercept, and with beserker rage = gg.

Jomo 11-13-2005 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by HKS
With Lifegiving gem and the pvp trinket, a warrior would destroy the mage. Improved intercept, and with beserker rage = gg.
LOL

How many warriors have improved intercept? Seriously kid, go back to mah-jjong

Ulic Qel-Droma 11-13-2005 01:15 AM

warriors can 2 shot all caster classes. if they get two lucky crits. ive done it many times.

Jomo 11-13-2005 01:39 AM

Maybe if you're fighting shitty casters with 2800 hp like the above poster.

RFlush 11-13-2005 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jomo
LOL

How many warriors have improved intercept? Seriously kid, go back to mah-jjong

Uh, ALOT of warriors.
With PvP trinket, imune to slowing effects. WIth lifegiving gem gives them 15% of their total health back and increases health by 15%.

Charge, hamstring, mage will blink, intercept, mage will ice nova, PvP trinket. If mages try to sheep, warriors pummel and then execute and GG/

ScizzMoney 11-13-2005 03:38 PM

I personally have no problem fighting warriors. I am a Shadow / Disc Priest. I have Prophecy and Trans pieces. only have around 4200 life buffed and around 9000 mana (more than the average bear). If I am fighting a warrior MC & BWL geared, I just have to kite them as best I can. If they get the charge off on me it's almost GG me, if they don't get a charge / intercept off, no contest for me. Hunters are a bitch for me for the most part now though.

jaguar604 11-13-2005 04:09 PM

anyone know when patch 1.9 is coming out? and if they are going to allow character account/server transfers soon?

Scoobysnax 11-14-2005 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by HKS
Uh, ALOT of warriors.
With PvP trinket, imune to slowing effects. WIth lifegiving gem gives them 15% of their total health back and increases health by 15%.

Charge, hamstring, mage will blink, intercept, mage will ice nova, PvP trinket. If mages try to sheep, warriors pummel and then execute and GG/

Yep, HKS is correct. That lifegiving gem is fucking annoying against a mage. I have both trinkets/AP and my frostbolts do about 2800+ and still MS warrior duels goes 50/50 for me . Only class that gives mages' problems 100% of the time though is a warlock.

SkinnyPupp 11-14-2005 03:01 PM

1.9 info http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/underdev/

Jomo 11-14-2005 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Scoobysnax
Yep, HKS is correct. That lifegiving gem is fucking annoying against a mage. I have both trinkets/AP and my frostbolts do about 2800+ and still MS warrior duels goes 50/50 for me . Only class that gives mages' problems 100% of the time though is a warlock.
Just so you know, HKS was talking about warriors with improved intercept. You can't have improved intercept AND mortal strike. You have to pick one or the other.

Ronin 11-14-2005 03:49 PM

Mortal strike > improved intercept. I've never lost to a warrior that doesn't have mortal strike. Fury warriors hit me for nothing...

RFlush 11-14-2005 04:40 PM

What usually works out is that Mages rape warriors that are NOT fury/arms spec.

But a good fury/arms warrior with trinkets should be able to beat the mage in a duel.

For pvp situational, it would go to whoever spots who first.

FeistyBearH22a 11-18-2005 09:56 AM

http://media.putfile.com/Who-is-Leroy-Jenkins
Hope its not a repost. :P

Doubl3_H 11-18-2005 12:26 PM

HOLY SHIT!!! so hes that famous huh?

Ronin 11-18-2005 01:23 PM

WTB: Chromaggus that isn't red/bronze....


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net