BikerX: I think I posted the digital version of that shot before. That was taken with my Leica. I may be wrong though. :p

niforpix: Yes it is!

^^ Sweet!! lol :p

http://www.threesixtyphoto.com/TSP%2...SSWed-1680.jpg

http://www.threesixtyphoto.com/TSP%2...edDay-0651.jpg

http://www.threesixtyphoto.com/TSP%2...dding-0237.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3278/...747eca6d_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3163/...569561d5_b.jpg

Some B&W. Random shots with 85 1.2 II.

^ I see nothing :(

My bad, I was fixing something. It should be back up though.

View of downtown from my place.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2404/...c0788c7d9d.jpg

Moon was pretty big last night too (although it doesn't look so big in this shot)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3163/...13bea9c1bb.jpg

http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/k...e/IMG_6024.jpg

http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/k...e/IMG_6112.jpg

http://i278.photobucket.com/albums/k...e/IMG_6214.jpg

Cute!!.............

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3075/...94326b0f_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3183/...fcf6ae53_o.jpg

ckrieg - Great photos, your loving the off camera flash thing aren't you :)

haha yea for sure! You can do so much with them!

I actually just ordered a third one :)

^^ is it infrared? Which ones do you have? I just have the Canon transmitter that attaches to my camera, and 580ex flash, but I haven't really got a chance to use it other than few test shots at home. But I think the flash always has to be in the line of sight, no?

Yes, with infrared, you need line of sight. If you find line of sight a problem for you, check out radio poppers.

I'm actually using Vivitar 285hv flashes with the ebay triggers

[QUOTE=Ronin;5987227]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3075/...94326b0f_o.jpg

reminds me of "judy mary"

I think I'm finally starting to understand how to shoot macro (properly) after screwing around with my camera on my day off. Haven't done macro in months... Unfortunately I didn't have my 580ex on me, and I still don't have a softbox to make the lighting not as harsh.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3227/...4519d20055.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3060/...1fd4f6f83e.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3095/...63b824fb69.jpg

Focus looks spot on for all 3! Great job. I like the first one best :)

Thank you sir! :)

For macro, you need a ring flash, not a soft box.

http://www3.telus.net/peazs/aug08/IM...edit_small.jpg

http://www3.telus.net/peazs/aug08/IM...edit_small.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2201/...e3566c57_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3258/...1ba632aa_o.jpg

Not necessarily. I've been chatting with this guy on www.thephotoforum.com who uses a 580ex flash and a Lumiquest Softbox for a diffuser. His photos are amazing. Check out his website:

http://www.tcproimages.com/Macro

He doesn't use a ring flash at all and 98% of his shots are handheld.

Is he using the little ones that fit on the flash? I guess that would work, but you wouldn't get the softer, even lighting a ringflash would provide. See how hard the lighting is on his photos? His light source is too far from the subject. I'd guess he's suppressed the specular highlights somewhat in PS.

Yeah I see what you mean. I guess it's somewhat an alternative to spending $500 on a ring flash.

Wes, can you please send me the original
Thanks :D