REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-27-2010, 11:45 PM   #76
Resident Bullshitter
 
.Renn.Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,209
Thanked 298 Times in 152 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darnold View Post
Half of the guys I work with drive diesel trucks worth at least as much as any e46 M3. Its not some kind of special exclusive car....

The rest of this post is most likely bullshit anyways lol.
M3 was never a special exclusive car, there were probably more E46 M3 around than 330CI around 5-6 years ago when they were still "new".... btw... thats when people were buying it for 80-100k brand new, and weren't "affordable" like now at 25k USED
Advertisement
.Renn.Sport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2010, 04:02 AM   #77
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
darnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 680
Thanked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BEEB View Post
Would love to hear some sort of mean sound from your B18C1 engine !
I've said that just to pick on you ! Just to let you know, I do have a B16 EG civic and a E46 M3.
I dont consider my GSR anywhere remotely close to being powerful. I was in a pinch for a vehicle last year before heading out to edmonton for work, and a friend happened to be selling his JDM fronted GSR at the same time.

Ive had Integras for too many years now, and something from BMW or Subaru would really hit the spot!
__________________
09 135i
06 R6
darnold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 04:07 PM   #78
RabidMod
 
RabidRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 6,113
Thanked 1,099 Times in 407 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Z3guy View Post
3) VANOS System - buy a low km car....the VANOS system will eventually go...approx. 100K kms...cost can range from $2K to $7k
4) Rear Subframe - don't buy a car that has been tracked, unless the car has addressed rear subframe issues. Fixing a cracked subframe is big money....$2K+
Hmm. Sounds like the e46 M3 would be pretty terrible for a track car then. Is there specific preventive maintenance you can do to prevent these issues?
__________________
22 R1T | 03 S2K
RabidRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 04:17 PM   #79
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,427
Thanked 4,799 Times in 1,763 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Livre View Post
The M3 looks better, sounds better, and its a BMW after all not a Chevrolet.
The M3's straight six will never, ever, in a million years sound better than a Z06's V8.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 04:53 PM   #80
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
ShyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,341
Thanked 263 Times in 82 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RabidRat View Post
Hmm. Sounds like the e46 M3 would be pretty terrible for a track car then. Is there specific preventive maintenance you can do to prevent these issues?
Subframe issues were a design flaw in the E46 chassis and not just the M3. There was a recall on the subframe after a lawsuit with BMW of America in the US. Unfortunately the claim doesn't apply to canadians. The M3 is a awesome track car. VANOS issues really didnt' happen that often and only to a select few.
__________________
:makeout:
ShyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 05:55 PM   #81
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,370
Thanked 1,874 Times in 604 Posts
Hey shyguy, did you change cars to an E55/63?
__________________
16 GT3 RS
11 R8 V10
17 Long beach blue M2
86 944 Turbo with 340rwhp Lindsay Racing kit
15 991 PTS GT3
18 VW Golf R
Z3guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 06:10 PM   #82
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 114
Thanked 14 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Great68 View Post
The M3's straight six will never, ever, in a million years sound better than a Z06's V8.
different class of cars.....

dumbass
OhSoGood is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 06-29-2010, 07:56 PM   #83
Willing to sell body for a few minutes on RS
 
Great68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Victoria
Posts: 10,427
Thanked 4,799 Times in 1,763 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhSoGood View Post
different class of cars.....

dumbass
An engine's sound has nothing to do with a car's "class" fucktard.
__________________
1968 Mustang Coupe
2008.5 Mazdaspeed 3
1997 GMC Sonoma ZR2
2014 F150 5.0L XTR 4x4

A vehicle for all occasions
Great68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 08:16 PM   #84
Banned (BBM)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
but u cant really compare a 4 banger to a V10

obviously the V10 will sound better?

Mugen EvOlutioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 08:36 PM   #85
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Amaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,311
Thanked 707 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RabidRat View Post
Hmm. Sounds like the e46 M3 would be pretty terrible for a track car then. Is there specific preventive maintenance you can do to prevent these issues?
Don't let the haters fool you, it's a fantastic track car. That's what it was built for.

Subframe and VANOS issues were resolved for 03+ models I believe, and even in the early years they weren't "common" issues. The engine itself is bulletproof and the build quality is top-notch aside from the usual Euro issues.

And yes, proper preventative maintenance can ensure the car is very dependable, especially 2003 and up models with less than 200,000km. It's certainly not a Honda Civic in terms of reliability, but by no means will it be a nightmare to own, either.

Plus, it's an amazingly fun car to drive, which in my opinion more than makes up for its reliability shortcomings...
Amaru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 11:10 PM   #86
:: Sells McLarens, Not tofu :okay: ::
 
tofu1413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 10,740
Thanked 11,815 Times in 3,329 Posts
hmm the only thing i can think thats really expensive on those cars are.....



tires. knowing any person that would buy one, would drive it quite frequently. And any owner would go through quite a few sets over the ownership of the car.

as for engine sounds. they're completely different. how can you compare?
__________________
19' Audi TT-RS S tronic w/ RS sport - Glacier White

13' Nissan DBA-R35 GT-R Black Ed - Black met. - "Sophia"

00' Acura 1.6EL - // Power of dreams Project - "Unity"

02' Nissan M35 Stagea - "Wynn"

91' Honda EF Civic CX - "Xander"

- The Drinker of Many Many Coffees @ McLaren Vancouver
tofu1413 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2010, 11:59 PM   #87
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Amaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,311
Thanked 707 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu1413 View Post
hmm the only thing i can think thats really expensive on those cars are.....
Yeah, but that is obviously true of any high-performance vehicle. Most performance freaks opt for the 18" M3 wheel to reduce weight/rotational mass, which probably reduces the tire cost a fair bit over the 19" rims. Regardless of the vehicle, if you drive like a maniac you'll wear out your tires pretty damn quickly.

Still, you're definitely right to some extent. I bought a set of 4 new Michelin Pilot Sport PS2 all-season tires a couple of weeks ago for my 330ci (factory-size 17" wheels) and had to fork over nearly $1300. Comparable tires in 18" would probably be another couple hundred bucks on top of that.

But, if you went to the States and bought "decent-but-not-insane" summer tires, you wouldn't have to empty your savings.
Amaru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 05:59 AM   #88
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,370
Thanked 1,874 Times in 604 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by RabidRat View Post
Hmm. Sounds like the e46 M3 would be pretty terrible for a track car then. Is there specific preventive maintenance you can do to prevent these issues?
The M3 is actually a very good track car.....as long as the sub frame issue has been addresssed. The issues I quoted are worst case scenarios...for my M3...I never had any of the issues I listed. Most of the common problems on M3s is due to owners not following the BMW recommended service intervals or using inferior oil.
__________________
16 GT3 RS
11 R8 V10
17 Long beach blue M2
86 944 Turbo with 340rwhp Lindsay Racing kit
15 991 PTS GT3
18 VW Golf R
Z3guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-30-2010, 09:37 PM   #89
Rs has made me the woman i am today!
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,310
Thanked 580 Times in 230 Posts
If that doesnt' sound like a tinny gutless fartmobile I dont know what does. Ferrari may sound raspy but in no way do they EVER get confused with a fartmobile.
Well theres one advantage of owning a m3 with an exhaust over a ferrari... it would be that i'd never floor it because it sounds so bad so i'd save alot in gas.
Death2Theft is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 06-30-2010, 09:47 PM   #90
Everyone wants a piece of R S...
 
ALEX1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: vancouver
Posts: 358
Thanked 318 Times in 52 Posts
buy a 04+ and you good to go.
ALEX1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 04:26 AM   #91
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Amaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,311
Thanked 707 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Death2Theft View Post
If that doesnt' sound like a tinny gutless fartmobile I dont know what does. Ferrari may sound raspy but in no way do they EVER get confused with a fartmobile.
Well theres one advantage of owning a m3 with an exhaust over a ferrari... it would be that i'd never floor it because it sounds so bad so i'd save alot in gas.
Jesus, it's not the beefiest sounding exhaust in the world but "tinny gutless fartmobile" is pushing it. Still sounds better than 99% of the ricer Ebay mufflers out there.
Amaru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 09:46 AM   #92
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,370
Thanked 1,874 Times in 604 Posts
^ the rasp from an E46 M3 at first sounds weird....same kind of way a 911 flat 6 sounds...different.....everyone is different, I actually like the rasp from the M54 motor. If you don't like it, just get a rasp eliminator pipe. The sound is completely different. I actually got mid pipes that made the rasp sound even more aggressive!.......
__________________
16 GT3 RS
11 R8 V10
17 Long beach blue M2
86 944 Turbo with 340rwhp Lindsay Racing kit
15 991 PTS GT3
18 VW Golf R
Z3guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 01:56 PM   #93
Banned (BBM)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
to be honest...it sounds pretty shitty

not feeling the raspy sound AT ALL


prefer the VQ engine, sounds much better
Mugen EvOlutioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 03:15 PM   #94
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
ShyGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8,341
Thanked 263 Times in 82 Posts
Who cares about the sound. The S54 is a way better performing engine then the VQ
Posted via RS Mobile
ShyGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 03:41 PM   #95
RS.net, where our google ads make absolutely no sense!
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: rawr
Posts: 927
Thanked 1,324 Times in 249 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Who cares about the sound. The S54 is a way better performing engine then the VQ
Posted via RS Mobile
^+1.

The VQ engine, especially the 3.7L, is very raspy top end; it's not very refined. The shifter vibrates quite a bit and it just doesn't sound too good. It definitely has lots of power though.

S54 on the other hand was smooth as hell. Revs up fast and sounds great.
rawr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 07:14 PM   #96
Banned (BBM)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
i thought its due to FR layout, therefore the shifter vibrates like a dildo. At least that was the case for 350z


which engine is the S54
Mugen EvOlutioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 12:55 AM   #97
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Amaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria
Posts: 1,311
Thanked 707 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mugen EvOlutioN View Post
i thought its due to FR layout, therefore the shifter vibrates like a dildo. At least that was the case for 350z


which engine is the S54
S54 is the e46 M3 motor. 3.2L inline-6. Easily one of the best motors of the past decade; I doubt there are many car freaks that would even try to argue that. Smooth, linear power - and lots of it, all the way up to 8,300rpm.

VQ sounds beefy, but I agree with rawr, it lacks refinement. Still a good motor, don't get me wrong, but it was really never in the same league as the S54. Not from a driver's standpoint, anyway. It's not nearly as smooth as the BMW motor (an I6 is inherently more balanced than a V6 obviously) and it's still doesn't make the same top-end power as the S54.

But yeah, if you buy a car based only on it's exhaust note, you should buy a VQ-powered vehicle and not an M3.
Amaru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 07:36 AM   #98
I Will not Admit my Addiction to RS
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Vancouver
Posts: 584
Thanked 194 Times in 59 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaru View Post
But yeah, if you buy a car based only on it's exhaust note, you're a fucking idiot
fixed
ericthehalfbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 08:09 AM   #99
Resident Bullshitter
 
.Renn.Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,209
Thanked 298 Times in 152 Posts
i find the S54 on the M3 feel exactly the same as the VQ35DE from 1000-6600RPM... from 6600RPM to 8300RPM is where the M3 takes over
.Renn.Sport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 08:57 AM   #100
Banned (BBM)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 16,142
Thanked 627 Times in 368 Posts
actually i felt the S54 lacks low end torque. VQ was able to drive around town shifting anywhere from 2000-2500rpm, and it felt torquey.

S54 is all about mid and high end power


VQ lots low and mid, but really lacks the high. I felt pointless revving after 4700-5000rpm till redline.
Mugen EvOlutioN is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net