Quote:
Originally Posted by Arash
(Post 7160053)
I was pulling statement trying to find reasoning other then, its fake. You never answered the questions and I dont want to know anymore from our discussion.
|
I answered the question, and then you pulled shit out of your ass. If you didn't want to know more from the discussion, then why bring it up again? Way to completely misconstrue what I was trying to say.
Quote:
The shit box comment was made after your post, and I commented after that. Had it been made after Mel Gibsons comment, I would have made the same joke. I dont see how its at your expense unless you care for it in what I deem an undesirable thing.
|
Why the fuck are you saying Mel Gibson when it was jivan6 that made that post about the PT? Again, pulling shit out of you ass. Of course it's at my expense, because you used me in it. Using me in a joke is obviously at my expense. Do you not understand that if you are the butt of a joke, it is at YOUR expense?
Quote:
No I questioned it
Okay so you have no qualms about jumping into a friends fake Lambo?
|
You changed this
after the fact. Once again, I already answered it as if it were a
question already. So questioning it, doesn't make much of a difference.
Quote:
Again you said your problem with replicas is that its fake, is there a thing as fake performance? A replica does 0-100km in 4 seconds, is that a fake performing car? I dont think so. If you have other reasoning's to call the performance of a replica fake, then you should have been more specific to start with when just saying, its fake.
|
This isn't what we're arguing here at the moment. Stop trying to change the argument. (Just so you know, I didn't say anything about fake performance, the fact of the matter still stands, the car is FAKE.)
Quote:
Prior to my statement, you were showcasing how much performance you would get for the same money as a replica like the mr2 which I included as a donor. So I very well assumed that you not wanting a fake, isnt just to do with the fact that you can get more performance out a none replica. See how your assumptions are prolonging my one post? Yes I put a purl on that because you have taken my statements and cut them into assumptions where for the most part, they are questions.
This is a question not an assumption.
so you have no qualms about jumping into a friends fake Lambo and driving around ?
You say the problem with replicas is that its fake, so I questioned if you would ride in one.
|
Every time you say "I think" it is an assumption. I'm not cutting them, stop trying to make me look like I'm misconstruing your points, I'm reading them as I see it. I'm not extending one post, you made 4 assumptions in 1 sentence. Way to miss the point again. you're bringing in an irrelevant point that isn't a part of this argument. What I stated in #3 was what you stated in blue above, not that question. You questioned my pride and whether or not I care if other people see me in it, NOT that question you noted above. Why the fuck are you saying that they are
"in effect, questions" when they are
statements. You can't imply a question, they either are or they aren't. Too late to change them now. Quit fucking trying to bring in questions that aren't part of what is being discussed. That question you noted about jumping into a lambo just now has no bearing on your assumptions about my pride, because once again, my pride has no effect on whether or not I want to be in a replica.
Quote:
So you feel you have too much pride to be in a fake looking and branded car... or you dont have the balls to not care ... Im sure its not just the bang for the performance buck.
Im a consumer of my own product, I am right to what ever I believe about replicas. I like to make assumptions. I like to market my product to my own advantage.
I try to brainwash consumer on forums to buy my product. :)
|
I didn't question your beliefs on replicas. So don't drag that bullshit in here. Again, you are trying to switch the subject in your favor. You make a product to appeal to the
consumer not the creator. Marketing the product to
your advantage doesn't help you in the least.
Quote:
Lots of things are said on internet forums, debating internet etiquette and formalities I would think belong on a lawyers forum, not a car one.
|
Another attempted subject change. I'm not debating etiquette, nor formalities. What I'm debating here is whether or not you were making assumptions. Again, for the last time,
Stop trying to change the subject.Nothing about etiquette was argued-AT ALL. Basic etiquette applies to most of this forum besides fight club anyways.
Stop trying to manipulate the argument into your favour by bringing in irrelevant points. That is both flawed arguing and flawed logic. I'm simply counter arguing what you try to manipulate because what you say is different from every single thing you have said before. You are changing both the subject and the argument that was mentioned previously, which attempts to make the previous argument a moot point, when I am presenting both
valid and relevant points about what you said
previously.