REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   The Official 2011/2012 Canucks Thread (https://www.revscene.net/forums/647779-official-2011-2012-canucks-thread.html)

jeedee 06-20-2011 11:03 PM

I remember reading a post saying "Be careful what you wish for Canucks fans" - Flyers fan.

I would hands down have Lu as my goalie ANY day of week for my team instead of a goalie grave yard with inconsistent goalies every year. I don't blame Lu for our losses in the finals. It was just bad timing on the injuries we had.

Just look at Philly for an example. They have a stacked team with elite forwards and defencemen. If it wasn't for their inconsistent goaltending, IMO they would be repeat NHL champions.

Goaltending and defense wins championships, remember that.

Mercy 06-20-2011 11:05 PM

Get to game 7 of Stanley cup finals... Trade goalie.
Posted via RS Mobile

spoon.ek9 06-20-2011 11:05 PM

repeat? they lost to chicago in the final :p

FerrariEnzo 06-20-2011 11:06 PM

Man it should have ended in Game 6 if they put in Schneider... but nooooooo... Lus the #1 and HAS to be in net to win...


given how they played in the reg season, all the series in the playoffs should not have gone past 5 games... 6 games maybe but definitely not up to game 7.. just ridiculous for a team that does so well in the reg season.

jeedee 06-20-2011 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FerrariEnzo (Post 7484292)
Man it should have ended in Game 6 if they put in Schneider... but nooooooo... Lus the #1 and HAS to be in net to win...


given how they played in the reg season, all the series in the playoffs should not have gone past 5 games... 6 games maybe but definitely not up to game 7.. just ridiculous for a team that does so well in the reg season.

No way would I have put Schneids in game 6. Lu came off of a shutout and he doesn't get the start? That would be a HUGE slap in the face for him [going into game 6]. We can sit here and say "we should've, we could've, we would've put Schneider in for game 6", but we didn't. Leave it at that.

It's a completely different game in the playoffs. Statistics don't mean shit. The underdog can upset the favorite any given day. Mind you, injuries caught up with the team late into the playoffs preventing them from performing the way they did compared to regular season.

pure.life 06-20-2011 11:37 PM

now we wouldn't want Lu to leave and be stuck with goalies like Cloutier, Brochu and Sabourin do we?

Ronin 06-20-2011 11:38 PM

I sort of agree that putting Schneider in net may have won the game but the long terms effects of doing so would be huge. It's just disrespectful to the guy that has brought you all this way...not to mention how the team would see it. It would show the lack of confidence the team had in Lu.

Either way, it would've never happened and it should never happen.

AzNightmare 06-20-2011 11:40 PM

I'm so annoyed by all the people that keep assuming Canucks would have won with Schneider in net. Remember, Canucks couldn't even score on Thomas...
Maybe that had something to do with not winning.

Maybe if Canucks PP didn't go 1/65 (or something ridiculous like that), they wouldn't have lost.
And don't even get me started on the people blaming the refs with stats like that.

spideyv2 06-20-2011 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FerrariEnzo (Post 7484292)
Man it should have ended in Game 6 if they put in Schneider... but nooooooo... Lus the #1 and HAS to be in net to win...


given how they played in the reg season, all the series in the playoffs should not have gone past 5 games... 6 games maybe but definitely not up to game 7.. just ridiculous for a team that does so well in the reg season.

Get Shutout in Game 5 and then get benched for Game 6? lol
You should be our coach bro, I bet we'd be perennial Stanley Cup champs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

goo3 06-20-2011 11:53 PM

Schneider will have his ups and downs. Every young goalie does and you see many examples. It's a lot different being a backup/noob where nobody knows how you play vs a starter where they have time to figure you out.

As for Luongo vs Thomas (by Kevin Woodley):

Quote:

"[He's] very much a structured goaltender. Very much a rigid butterfly-style goaltender. When the Canucks are tight defensively and taking away second chances in the middle of the ice, he is among the best. But when there are breakdowns, the difference between him and the athletic and acrobatic Tim Thomas -- in terms of their ability to pick up those mistakes for their teammates with the big, timely, athletic diving saves -- is that you can't get a book on Thomas. With Luongo, when someone walks in alone there are two spots: High glove and five-hole. He's just so rigid in his structure that it's become easier for teams to target him and break him down."
Quote:

Thomas is typically at his most aggressive off the rush. That sometimes creates backwards flow that leaves him off angle and causes some of the “soft” goals he gave up in the Eastern Conference final against Tampa Bay.

Like all goalies, there are good and bad with Thomas, strengths and weaknesses. The aggressiveness that serves him so well can be used against him without the right kind of help from his defense. It’s no different than Roberto Luongo getting ventilated because of his deeper positioning when the Canucks gave up the middle of the ice to the corner-picking Blackhawks in the first round.

Luongo didn’t change after that, but his team has done a better job since at shutting down the front of his net, including second chances the first two games of the final. Similarly, Thomas didn’t change dramatically after the first two games of this series.

Their differing styles are not always perfect, and won’t always work, but it’s also part of why they’re playing for the Stanley Cup.
He's got some weak parts of his game he can and needs to improve on because they really get exploited. Game 6 was a horrible game for him. I was disappointed AV didn't put Schneider in after 2 goals to give Boston a different look.

At the same time, the "blame Luongo" posts make some of you guys sound really dumb TBH. 15 wins.. selective memory.. time to finger point! Really? In 2011, I don't see any brick wall goalies anymore. Even as fans, meaningful analysis/criticism is productive. Knee-jerk blaming on this scale, I really believe, gets into their heads to some extent.

Want to learn more about goaltending? Try strapping on the pads. Or read Kevin Woodley www.ingoalmag.com

goo3 06-20-2011 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronin (Post 7484344)
I sort of agree that putting Schneider in net may have won the game but the long terms effects of doing so would be huge. It's just disrespectful to the guy that has brought you all this way...not to mention how the team would see it. It would show the lack of confidence the team had in Lu.

Either way, it would've never happened and it should never happen.

When it came down to a best of three, I saw it as a short tourney like the Olympics. You go with whoever can get the job done. But hindsight is 20/20.

DanHibiki 06-21-2011 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FerrariEnzo (Post 7484292)
Man it should have ended in Game 6 if they put in Schneider... but nooooooo... Lus the #1 and HAS to be in net to win...


given how they played in the reg season, all the series in the playoffs should not have gone past 5 games... 6 games maybe but definitely not up to game 7.. just ridiculous for a team that does so well in the reg season.

Wow I jus---wow.

trip 06-21-2011 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shawn79 (Post 7483704)
drop it off before sunday



anymore info???

shawn79 06-21-2011 12:53 AM

^ forgot the address ill update u guys tmr

Toronto worst city for pro sport HA-HA!
http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/loc...TorontoNewHome

Derek_N84 06-21-2011 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp (Post 7480301)
Wow, mike Gillis sure gets a lot of tire pumping, considering the core of the team was put together by Burke and Nonis. Something Gillis never gives credit for btw.

Gillis has done a good job of filling gaps and basically not fucking up like a lot of GMs do. I don't thunk he's a "genius" though...

Patrick White for Erhoff. MG = Genius :fuckyea:

FerrariEnzo 06-21-2011 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeedee (Post 7484304)
No way would I have put Schneids in game 6. Lu came off of a shutout and he doesn't get the start?

he let in 12 goals in 2 games in boston.. isnt that a sign?? so what does he do in game 6 at boston...

jeedee 06-21-2011 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FerrariEnzo (Post 7484470)
he let in 12 goals in 2 games in boston.. isnt that a sign?? so what does he do in game 6 at boston...

So what? He had 2 shutouts in 3 home games, isn't that a sign?

Thank god you're not the coach of the team...
Posted via RS Mobile

DanHibiki 06-21-2011 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FerrariEnzo (Post 7484470)
he let in 12 goals in 2 games in boston.. isnt that a sign?? so what does he do in game 6 at boston...

I dun think any coach has put in their backup goalie in the Stanley Cup finals after their starter got a shut out the game before.

It would have been the boldest move ever made.

will068 06-21-2011 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronin (Post 7484344)
I sort of agree that putting Schneider in net may have won the game but the long terms effects of doing so would be huge. It's just disrespectful to the guy that has brought you all this way...not to mention how the team would see it. It would show the lack of confidence the team had in Lu.

Either way, it would've never happened and it should never happen.

This.

If we had a 3-0 lead in the series like the CHI series, it would have made for a stronger case to put Corey on for Game 6 and have Lu back in Game 7. However, Lu just came out of a shutout.

The series reminded me of the Flames/Canucks series in 2004. We just got outworked, out-coached, and ran out of gas.

FerrariEnzo 06-21-2011 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jeedee (Post 7484473)
So what? He had 2 shutouts in 3 home games, isn't that a sign?

Thank god you're not the coach of the team...
Posted via RS Mobile

some goalies just cant do good in certain arenas.. call me superstitious...

7seven 06-21-2011 05:45 AM

Looks like its only a matter of days till Jagr is back

Quote:

Real_ESPNLeBrun Pierre LeBrun
Jagr's agent Petr Svoboda this morning tells me it's down to 3 teams: Pittsburgh, Detroit and one other NHL team he doesn't want to name.
53 minutes ago
Quote:

Real_ESPNLeBrun Pierre LeBrun
``He’s really decided he wants to play in the NHL and he’s excited about it. He’s ready for the challenge,’’ Svoboda told ESPN.com.
53 minutes ago
Quote:

Real_ESPNLeBrun Pierre LeBrun
Svoboda plans to meet with Jagr again later today. Decision should come within next few days
53 minutes ago

FerrariEnzo 06-21-2011 06:59 AM

CANUCKS should get Jagr!!

Watercloset 06-21-2011 07:01 AM

Doesn't seem like GMMG wants to move Ballard, as he openly stated.

If we end up re-signing all of Ehrhoff, Bieksa, Hansen and Lapierre, we will probably no room to acquire a 2nd liner to play alongside Kesler unless we trade, or just bring someone up from the farm.

I'm hoping AV pulls his head out of his arse and give Ballard proper ice time next season, pair him with Tanev, give him 1st/2nd unit PK and 2nd unit PP duties.

1st unit PK: Hamhuis-Ballard or 2nd unit PK: Ballard-Edler/Ehrhoff
2nd unit PP: Ballard-Bieksa/Tanev/Edler (if Samuelsson and Ehrhoff are on the point)

Watercloset 06-21-2011 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FerrariEnzo (Post 7484551)
CANUCKS should get Jagr!!

We're not on his wishlist.

And it seems like he's leaning towards signing with Pittsburgh, if the Pens want him that is.

spoon.ek9 06-21-2011 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Watercloset (Post 7484553)
Doesn't seem like GMMG wants to move Ballard, as he openly stated.

If we end up re-signing all of Ehrhoff, Bieksa, Hansen and Lapierre, we will probably no room to acquire a 2nd liner to play alongside Kesler unless we trade, or just bring someone up from the farm.

I'm hoping AV pulls his head out of his arse and give Ballard proper ice time next season, pair him with Tanev, give him 1st/2nd unit PK and 2nd unit PP duties.

1st unit PK: Hamhuis-Ballard or 2nd unit PK: Ballard-Edler/Ehrhoff
2nd unit PP: Ballard-Bieksa/Tanev/Edler (if Samuelsson and Ehrhoff are on the point)


this better not be the case. we need someone who can compete at the NHL level to compliment kesler at his BEST; which is obviously right now. otherwise it's going to continue being a helicopter 2nd line.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net