![]() |
Quote:
:awwyeah: |
Quote:
In BC, where the majority of our power comes from hydroelectric dams the "fuel" (falling water) is practically free. The cost difference between running one generator at a dam versus ten is relatively small. And don't believe the whole "net importer" bullshit, we have TONS of spare capacity if we need it. Burrard Thermal is a 1GW station that basically goes completely unused. Peak billing makes sense in the US where they have a lot of coal and gas, because their fuel is bloody expensive. |
Of course the alternative to peak hour billing would be more expensive overall billing for everyong. Wouldn't that be awesome? That way, instead of adjusting your power consumption to save money, you just pay more! :awwyeah: And BC already has among the cheapest power in the world. They always will. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't know what these will do to our health in the future but honestly you're just a big of an idiot as you make the conspiracy theorists out to be because we're just now being exposed to these. I remember when they used to say cell phones didn't cause brain cancer but now even the World Health Organization admits it ...Idiots like you probably would have had the same stance you do now. |
Quote:
|
request to change thread into basic conspiracy thread |
Quote:
If they ever did go to Peak billing I'd put my hate on Hydro itself, and the government for letting them do it. Although I take Hydro's current denial about Peak billing with a bit of skepticism. I wouldn't trust them to not change their mind about something like that in the future. |
Quote:
Do you own a cellphone? Wireless home phones? How about a wireless router? Do you live near any transmission towers? Do you use a microwave? Hell, do you gamble? There's RF trackers in high value chips. My point is there are far many more objects out there that either use RF, some type of wireless pulse, or are simply much more "dangerous" to a human on a much more continuous basis that to worry about smart meters is simply inane. |
^ lol didn't realize his name until you quoted him surreyjack604 :troll: |
Quote:
Not technically true. WHO: Cell phone use can increase possible cancer risk - CNN.com They found evidence of an increase in risk.. but the millions of cellphone users out there aren't finding tumours bulging out of their head. |
Quote:
|
But in the 25 or so years that we've had cellular networks they've refined the technology to properly utilize it in things like smart meters. Its not like the smart meters will operate on Cold War-era mobile phone technology. They'll transmit for 10-30 seconds (approx) once a day on an advanced band. Hell, watching your Pizza Pop spin in the microwave is probably worse for you. |
What about chem trails though guys!:suspicious: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Not sure if anyone's remembered, but the truly harmful type of radiation is ionizing radiation. Cellphones, smartmeters and other things of that sort emit non-ionizing radiation. It's true, the WHO has now added it to their list of "Stuff we may now think possibly could have some link to cancer in some way if we do a lot more research over several more decades", but it is still infinitely less powerful than...uh...sleeping next to your SO. http://imgs.xkcd.com/blag/radiation.png |
Quote:
|
Quote:
i thought they only need to build as many dams/generators to produce the power needed during peak hours, so if people spread out their usage through the day, the peak will be less and less dams/generators needed, so that's a save on infrastructure, no? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BBC News - Mobile phones: 'Still no evidence of harm to health' |
I could care less if there are any problems with smart meters or not. It's the fact that we never got the ability to chose. Next thing you know they will ban turbos because they use too much gas and are bad for the enviroment, and you wont get to vote on that either. The fact that it cost them 1 billion dollars for the meters, yet it's supposed to save you more money in the long run is the greatest scam/sales pitch people are sold. I'll be damned if the cost of those meters arn't recouped, by gouging the customers but by that time it will be too late. |
Why the fucking fuck would you get to vote for or against using digital meters instead of analog? |
If you don't want to feel like you are 'monitored' then cancel your electricity and generate it yourself. Otherwise, buy a wind turbine and make your own. All these people feeling like 'big brother' is watching. Honestly, if you are not growing pot, then stop worrying. Its not like they are putting cameras up inside your house and watching you surf youporn... Nobody complains about the internet company (telus/shaw) knowing what you are browsing. People complaining about their energy consumption are probably going on facebook and revealing personal pictures and information blatantly. I thought our generation gave zero fucks when it came to privacy.... |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net