![]() |
Well, you would need to prove the following: 1-there are "some type" of transmissions happening for more than the claimed seconds or minute 2-those transmissions are different than any other type of transmission in your house Now, so far no one has been able to do so because we are talking about random youtube videos and no diffinitive proof or evidence that there is an issue. Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
5) the people producing these videos are faking the EMF readings to "prove their point" Face it, it's unlikely any of these videos are being created by someone who's sure the meters are safe and are just wanting to prove it to the naysayers, only to be surprised by the results... they're made be people who've already decided to hate the meters for one reason or another and are looking for any reason to back up their fears. I suspect most of them have no idea how to properly use or read an EMF meter, either - probably something they bought from a spy store or Deal Extreme, turned it on, watched the needle move, and declared, "AH-HAH! S EE! CANCER IN THE AIR!" |
Quote:
Standard house wiring IF stages in a TV/cable tuner IF stages in a radio tuner Cell phones Cordless phones Driver stages in most types of monitors or displays Neighbors' WiFi signals In some areas, public WiFi broadcast signals (Shaw, et al) Fluorescent lights Microwaves Most types of AC motors (fridges, air conditioning, fans, etc.) Switching-mode power supplies in computers, phone adapters, chargers, etc. So once your EMF meter detects something, you then have to determine whether it's actually different from any of these, and stronger than any of these... then explain how all of these other things you've been surrounded by all your life have never caused you a problem, but this one low-power intermittent signal is suddenly shredding your body from the inside out. |
Quote:
|
Soundy, Have you actually bothered to look into how those EMF meters/detectors are operated? It's an EMF meter, not a nuclear power plant. You don't need a rocket science degree to know how to use one. Depending on the model and its capabilities, for the most part, you either physically bring the EMF meter closer to the place where you want verify the EMF readings, or you point the antenna towards a general direction. When the number goes up as you bring the EMF meter closer to the smart meter, or when the number goes up when you point the EMF meter towards the smart meter, and the number drops when you move away from the meter or cover the meter up with aluminum foil, I think that is saying something. You are free to come up with whatever speculations you feel like. None of that changes my first hand experience with them. |
Quote:
Once again, your standard house wiring has an EM field around it. Motors do. Lights do. TVs, tuners, radios, and wireless devices of all types are surrounded by them. All have different frequencies, different harmonics, behave differently around various types of metals and enclosures... and all will show up on a broadband meter. It doesn't prove anything except that something is using electricity in the vicinity. Quote:
|
hard to argue with these people who probably also believe chemtrails. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe the people that received the bigger than normal bills had something electrical that interfered with the smart meters, and Hydro would swear up and down that nothing was wrong with their meters. |
Quote:
Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i hope bc hydro charges 5k or more to the idiots that don't want these things installed on their houses. maybe that way it will bring down my hydro bill. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Only a video, like the kind I posted, is what gets people to understand, (and that was no home documentary either) not some scientific paper which would show my findings... little do sheep understand is that the government will flood false research to counter truth. These are the same people that wont bat an eye when they find out the BBC reported building 7 collapse 10 minutes before it actually happened. |
Quote:
I'm not going so far as to say Traum's problem is psychological, like some of you have, but I'm giving him the benefit of a doubt that there is something happening. |
Quote:
Being able to use your device != some crazy conspiratorial frequency. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Cellphones are on different frequencies than what Hydro is using. I'm not trying to attack anyone for their beliefs but give them the benefit of a doubt. If someone believes that they have a problem, I'm willing to listen but definitely won't call them a liar or tell them to visit a psychiatrist. |
Quote:
The fact remains, the EM spectrum is extremely crowded, and every different technology must fit within it's narrow slot in that spectrum. IF, for example, these use actual 802.11a/b/g/n WiFi, then they would HAVE to operate within the same spectrum as all other WiFi devices, or very close to it. It would be virtually impossible that that frequency would cause large numbers of people issues, when no other WiFi signals seem to; the person's sensitivity would have to be to a band so narrow, it's ridiculous. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
The UHF band runs between 300 MHz and 3 GHz. While I wont refute the theory that certain people may feel something through specific frequencies, it just seems odd that this very specific range is causing all these issues. The 900 MHz range has been in use by both amateurs (ham radios) and in ISM equipment for decades. I used to have an old cordless phones that also made use of this range. |
Now we have someone complaining about the free Wifi on BC ferries causing problems and how they need a Wifi free zone. Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net