![]() | |
DAT POKE CHECK by LUUU Posted via RS Mobile |
man probably one of his best spinoramas yet LOL wooooooo a win |
Lol lu Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
|
Am i reading this right? Our own Canuck fans are complaining about the winning shootout goal scored by us...... Who the fuck cares, we won |
|
Quote:
Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
Quote:
|
the hell, first day watching shootouts or something? Why do some of you guys sound like you've never seen Raymond (or any player) do the spinorama move before?? :suspicious: I used to beat a dead horse about how "cheap" this move was from a goalies pov. but I don't really care anymore. Plus, I think Smith stopped it last season. (and I analyzed that replay 100 times) and it's legal because the official rule states that only the puck needs to maintain continues motion. |
maybe i'm asking too much, but i'm not sure if i am still satisfied with tonight's win. Seems like ever since the cup run, Nucks has been winning games by a thread via shootout. |
TRADE LU WHILE HIS VALUE IS HIGH!!! :troll: Lu again proving he's been the better goalie this season :p |
The official rule is something like the puck has to be in continuous motion, but not necessarily in a forward direction I believe. If you really want to get technical, when you stick handle, everytime the puck moves back and forth, there is technically a split second where the motion of the puck is stopped before it can go in a different direction. You can also do a toe drag and pull the puck backwards yet it would still be a legal move. |
lol i remember there was a huge debate with spin-o-rama shootout moves last season Who the fuck cares? WE WON PEOPLE :facepalm: |
I would say the puck can stop its forward motion IF the player/play continues in a forward motion. And the player can stop its forward motion IF the puck/play continues in a forward motion. My thing on Spin-O-rama's is that they should have to continue in one fluid motion from spin to shot. If the player does a spin, and then stops and/or stick handles and then shoots, it should not count. I think Burrows' spin a while back shouldn't count since he stick handled the puck while standing stopped after his spin. Had he did his spin and turned and fired, I think it woulda been Ok. But the league said it woulda been OK. so that one and a few others sort of show you can do whatever you want. Has there even been a goal from a spin denied yet? I guess no ref wants to be the first to deny one. |
At work, how was the game? Did we dominate or barely hold on and win in the SO? Posted via RS Mobile |
Quote:
Sup phaggot |
DAMN. Epic comeback by Pittsburgh tonight. 3 goals in the 3rd to erase a 2-0 Boston lead. |
Garrison played his best game in a Nucks uniform today srs. |
oh hey raymond didnt fall down in the shoot out :badpokerface: (still rmbred the last time he tried the spin o rama and fell..) |
Official Rules - Rule 24: Penalty Shot - NHL.com - Rules One area of the rule states: Quote:
Quote:
As well, the player that's spinning doesn't skate "backward". They are simply pivoting. Burrows attempt on 2nd look, is actually very legal. As the puck never once stopped. And as a bonus, it even continued forward... very slowly. A shot was never taken prior to Burrow's spin, so he was still good to stick handle and shoot. Kerry Fraser also discussed about Burrow's shootout attempt. Fraser: Checking out Alex Burrows's shootout attempt Burrow's expression at 0:49. :notbad: |
Minny is losing 2-1 to the ducks. Were going back in 1st place in the division..back the wagon I go! ...lol |
When was the last time a spin-o-rama shootout goal called back? Raymond's goal was legal, get over it. :facepalm: Anyways.. I thought Booth played pretty good |
|
Quote:
|
Corey Perry is a dirtbag. Would love it if the Canucks sign him this summer. Buyout Booth + Ballard, sign Perry :fullofwin: |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:46 AM. | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net