REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   Vancouver's Real Estate Market (https://www.revscene.net/forums/674709-vancouvers-real-estate-market.html)

Harvey Specter 05-08-2025 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcedhk (Post 9176588)
https://www.rew.ca/properties/7423-t...e-vancouver-bc

IMO this is a steal. I'm guessing the realtor is trying to get a bidding war?

It's a leasehold.

RabidRat 05-08-2025 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EvoFire (Post 9176591)
1. Leasehold
2. 46 years old

Champlain Heights was never super expensive in that area. The rest of Killarney and Fraserview soared, but that little enclave of townhouses always stayed cheaper.

Any idea why? Is it a bad neighborhood or something?

I went to daycare apparently down the street from this house lol.

noclue 05-08-2025 04:30 PM

Champlain heights was/is considered one of the bad hoods social housing of east van.

JDMDreams 05-08-2025 04:35 PM

Dt, Killarney yo. Where dem crazy car killers come from.

I think it's a lease from the city? Not sure about this though. I know that area is mostly leasehold so obviously it's the people who can't afford freehold. I wonder when the lease ends. But would you really want to own a 50y old townhouse, you're just asking for special levies and everything is so dated. Also no resale, appreciation.

RabidRat 05-08-2025 04:35 PM

Oh shit.

I remember a kid in my class threw another kid off the top of the jungle gym. That explains that.

Hmm well that's good, it seems then I have acquired some street credits, for going to daycare in a bad neighborhood!!

Hondaracer 05-08-2025 04:58 PM

At Telus I worked a lot in Champlain, that area with that duplex is pretty ghetto. Lots of that type of old development, long time residents, horders, just generally run down developments approaching the end of life.

That one in the listing is day is one of the better developments in the area with more normal people

mikemhg 05-08-2025 05:10 PM

Champlain and Skeena -- Vancouver's only actual "hoods".

EvoFire 05-08-2025 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RabidRat (Post 9176702)
Any idea why? Is it a bad neighborhood or something?

I went to daycare apparently down the street from this house lol.

The thing with older developments, and older leasehold strata developments, the entry price is low. Back 50 years ago, SFH in the area would have been cheap for today's prices, that townhouse would probably carry a mid 5 digit sale price, possibly lower. It attracts a certain crowd.

Historically there are also quite a few foreclosures in the area. We looked at one in around 2015 when we were looking to buy our first place. IIRC the asking price was 220k, but the unit was gutted and in very poor state. I can't imagine having some one like that as a neighbour

LancerBoy 05-08-2025 06:06 PM

https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/art...s-up-for-sale/

For 11 years, she probably pays less than $2k to rent the whole house....it's time to gtfo and work like the rest of us, hon.

snowball 05-08-2025 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LancerBoy (Post 9176721)
https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/art...s-up-for-sale/

For 11 years, she probably pays less than $2k to rent the whole house....it's time to gtfo and work like the rest of us, hon.

The article is kinda misleading. Even if she didn't sign the agreement, they could've still served her notice for 3 month eviction, 1 month free rent anyway. It's not really buying her that much time. And the new owners only have to wait 6 months to relist for rental, but that place looks like a damn tear-down anyway.

Great68 05-08-2025 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowball (Post 9176727)
The article is kinda misleading. Even if she didn't sign the agreement, they could've still served her notice for 3 month eviction, 1 month free rent anyway. It's not really buying her that much time. And the new owners only have to wait 6 months to relist for rental, but that place looks like a damn tear-down anyway.

The new owner must actually live in the property for at least 12 months, or be subject to 12 month rent compensation penalty

I don't see any benefit to tenants voluntarily moving out on notification that their house is selling. At best the new owners may not want to move in, at worst, like you said they're out in 3 months anyway (which only begins after sale agreement is finalized, all conditions fulfilled and subjects removed).

That being said, the comments of the TRAC lawyer in the article bother me:

Quote:

“In situations like that, if a tenant wants to give up their home, they have a significant amount of leverage in that situation if they take the time to understand their rights and understand the situation they’re in,” Patterson said.
Saying tenants "have leverage" is stupid. It implies they can somehow stop or mess up the sale, or prevent the new owners from moving in, or make compensation demands greater than what's allowed in the RTA.
Provided everything is done by the book between the former and new owners, the tenant has no leverage in the situation.

snowball 05-08-2025 08:33 PM

He wants to make sure he gets paid a little each time a tenant consults him. Sounds like wants to encourage more of an unofficial "buyout" for the tenant to leave earlier than necessary.

bcedhk 05-09-2025 03:35 PM

https://www.rew.ca/properties/1115-e...-vancouver-bc#

lol "needs painting, bathroom, etc...." I also like how they used a scanned photo from the 90s

Gumby 05-09-2025 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcedhk (Post 9176882)
https://www.rew.ca/properties/1115-e...-vancouver-bc#

lol "needs painting, bathroom, etc...." I also like how they used a scanned photo from the 90s

Handyman special! It's also directly T-intersection with Ross Street, so terrible for Feng Shui.

Wonder what Hondaracer thinks of this place... :lol

6793026 05-09-2025 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcedhk (Post 9176882)
https://www.rew.ca/properties/1115-e...-vancouver-bc#

lol "needs painting, bathroom, etc...." I also like how they used a scanned photo from the 90s

holy crap.. that place looks like a dump LOL...

Eff-1 05-09-2025 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcedhk (Post 9176882)
https://www.rew.ca/properties/1115-e...-vancouver-bc#

lol "needs painting, bathroom, etc...." I also like how they used a scanned photo from the 90s

Can't tell what's more janky. The house? Or the real estate agent's description.

underscore 05-09-2025 09:10 PM

Why would you even bother with photos?

RevYouUp 05-09-2025 11:33 PM

Interior aside, it seems like a pretty good deal for $1.5m in the middle of Vancouver and it being only 30 years old. Tear down 70-90 year old buildings are asking just as much

Badhobz 05-10-2025 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6793026 (Post 9176917)
holy crap.. that place looks like a dump LOL...

Typical Guangdong hoarder house !!! Argh I can smell the sui yok fan permeated walls from here.

RevYouUp 05-10-2025 06:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badhobz (Post 9176932)
Typical Guangdong hoarder house !!! Argh I can smell the sui yok fan permeated walls from here.

Cleaning my grandparents house was so bad, found so many unused towels and bedsheets/blankets when the same old ones were reused for decades. Likewise for random utensils and pots/pans. Also, carpets are brutal, clothing moths were everywhere.

6thGear. 05-10-2025 09:45 AM

It's a court order sale


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net