![]() |
so i've been out of this thread for a bit but has anyone considered the following scenerio: Joe takes the bus from metrotown to Dunbar every day. Now he has a 2 zone bus pass to prove that he's a resident in zone 2 ( i know zones are not numbered but lets assume surrey and east is zone 3 , burnaby/tricities/richmond is zone 2 , vancouver is zone 1). What is stopping joe from "tapping-in" at Metrotown bus loop at which point translink withdraws $5 (cost of a 3 zone fair) from his account and "tapping out" just prior to 49th at Boundary at which point transit will credit $2.50 back to his account resulting in a 1 zone fair of $2.50. Then Joe continues to remain on the bus for the rest of the journey. Loophole? |
Quote:
Couple years later when it comes out how much all those REAL cops are making, everyone's screaming about "why do we need so many of them?!" Well guess what, you want REAL cops, they want REAL cop pay. Just like with the fare gates and elimination of the Zone system: everyone screamed for these things, and for them to be put in place ASAP... now that that's happening, everyone's pissed off with them and wants things back the way they were. Well to quote Soundgarden, folks: the grass is always greener where the dogs are shitting. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
One group will come up with a preposterous solution for a very small problem and raise all hell for something to be done. Then another group will come and find a very small flaw in that solution and then make a huge deal out of it. Knee-jerk reactions and subsequent outrage; front page news all over the Sun and the Province, demanding action now!! I disagree with some of the things Translink, and other large bodies, private or public, are doing. But Vancouver is one fucking hard city to please. |
Quote:
if they were to change it now it'll probably cost millions or something, and then you'd have to install them at every single station, people would destroy them for fun I'd imagine :badpokerface: |
Quote:
Essentially, they should only be Transit Security, not Transit Police. It makes so much more sense to leave the policing to real and properly trained police. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I will say I've seen more random checks from Transit Security (note not the police) where they will get on the bus and check fares after the bus crosses the zone. This is seldom, but happens on the 49, 25 and 135 every once in a blue moon. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
second of all, like i said before, there are mobile readers that transit cops carry around to see if your card is legitimately validated for you to be on the transit system. but that seems to be more based on luck. Quote:
transit police have full powers of VPD if i recall correctly. but their main focus is on the transit system (property, buses, skytrain etc.) where VPD resources are probably better used somewhere else where needed. besides, translink pays for transit police, so its really their "own authority" |
I wish Translink implemented a system based on RFID instead of tap-in tap out. no more tap in / out. install rfid reader at stations - where people can walk in and out and rfid will do its job. translink needs some young minds on their operations team! i personally would've contracted Treo to run it- its basically the same system. Probably negotiated a deal for the 2 for 1 ass rape. |
Quote:
If a incident happens on the skytrain and say a RCMP officer does not want to handle the case, they hand it over to transit police. And they do the full investigation. And most if not always gets passed down to transit police. Also, transit police is bound by duty to still enforce the law even though it is not near a skytrain area as well. So, they can give you a ticket :P |
Quote:
Quote:
Sure, RFID technology sounds great on paper, but how come no major transit system in the world uses RFID technology? Not the MTR, not the NYC subway, not Transport for London, not Paris, not Moscow Subway, not anywhere else? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
rfid / nfc on busses are possible... thanks for making me spend 2 seconds to google to see such technology is possible :fullofwin: |
:rukidding: Compass uses RFID technology. Edit: technically it doesn't. It uses contactless-smartcard tech. Which is more secure but a little more expensive than RFID. The main difference I can see is that RFID is read only. contactless smartcard has writable memory in addition to sending data. The principle of how the card and RFID work are similar though. |
Quote:
|
You can steal data from unprotected RFID chips. That's why NEXUS cards come with a protection sleeve so people can't steal the data and clone your card. |
Quote:
What do you think contactless chips are? Just various standards under the same technology umbrella of NFC/RFID. Our readers already support MC, Visa and AMEX and theres nothing stopping them from supporting NFC phones if they so desire in the future. http://abload.de/img/u-passbconcompasscard9mubu.png |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Co-Worker was a beta tester for the compass card system. From what he told me the system seems pretty good. Expect on buses, it takes a few seconds for to scan your card. I could see that having some issue on busy routes like the B-line. Sometimes it wouldn't even register that he tap the card so he had to do it again. So as Lomac suggested if there is a huge line up waiting to get on or off, it could cause some major delays. |
That's why it's called beta testing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Way to cheat Translink?s Compass card system discovered - BC | Globalnews.ca So....new system whose goal/intent is to reduce fare evasion and presumably the need for transit security/police to do manual checks, but we'll see need transit security/police to do fare checks :badpokerface: |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net