![]() |
no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! |
Quote:
|
LS FC gets around 8L/100 but I can push it to 12 if I'm constantly stomping on it |
cylinder deactivation |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I would rather have had the V6 if it were still available.... but I do hear the Focus RS 2.3T is quite a bit better. |
Plus it sounds like a god damn lawn mower. |
Quote:
This didn't seem to be happen with the ecoboost |
Quote:
Thanksgiving cruise today https://farm66.staticflickr.com/6553...5feed664_b.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
When I bought my '19, I actually went to buy an ecoboost, but after driving it, although the speedometer said it was faster, it felt much slower than my old car. It just felt blah. While I love the 5.0l I ended up with, I really don't need 460hp. I would have really liked the 2.7 ecoboost in a Mustang, with a similar power figure to the Edge Sport (335 hp, 380 ft lbs) 2.3 just doesn't do it, and the 5.0l is nuts. Need something in between. |
My brother's 2.7 Ecoboost in his Fusion Sport sounds like fake news Spoiler! |
the 2016 v6 was my first convertible experience...great on the highway i'm surprised ecoboost takes regular gas |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
the current Coyote 5L is a wonderful engine. very flexible powerband, and it still revs up to the top end. I suspect it may feel a bit lazy because of its displacement and a heavier flywheel. maybe fuel economy is decent because of gearing. i think the standard 5L gots some pretty tall final drives. performance package cars got a nicer off the line feel with shorter final drive. but having said that.... the voodoo 5.2L is just...... :sweetjesus: |
Quote:
Did you see the new Corvette C8.R? It also has a flat plane crank and is supposed to be derived from a road-going engine. I've actually got the 10AT with both cars. I've noticed that with the 5.0, it stays in 9th/10th going up hills on the highway whereas the 2.3T has to downshift to 6th and dig into boost just to maintain speed. |
That’s sound is sexy as hell... almost exotic. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
When I had my G8, the 6.0L was never under 14L/100km. It still had the cylinder deactivation too. It was a fun car to rip around in. Maybe my foot was a little heavy? |
Quote:
Those were under 3k lbs weren't they? Whereas I'd expect the G8 to be over 4k. Super cool car btw. Dreamed of a G8 with Kooks headers all through high school. |
holy crap. V8. hatch back with manual trans... 8L/100km/h....... with no fancy tech. Good god. LSFC for all. |
Quote:
|
Us V8 owners are literally burning money for additional “theatre”. I’m not happy until I hear some crackling and burbling as I lift off. |
Quote:
88 FC is around 2700lbs The drivetrain is probably about 100-130lbs heavier than the rotary but sans all AC related parts (including evap and box), PS, and emmisions, I'm guessing it's around 2800lbs. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net