REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Auto Chat (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-auto-chat_173/)
-   -   Official 2019 "Latest Pic of Yo Whip" Thread (https://www.revscene.net/forums/715743-official-2019-latest-pic-yo-whip-thread.html)

Badhobz 10-14-2019 07:17 AM

no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!! no replacement for displacement !!!

dared3vil0 10-14-2019 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 320icar (Post 8963024)
^^ lazy v8 [edit read as low revving] versus peppy boosted i4.

Can confirm the 2.3 ecoboost driiiiiiinks

Ya the 5.0 is somehow good on fuel. I get 11.5 l/100km. Hilariously, it actuallt revs higher than the 2.3. 7500rpm vs 7000.

fliptuner 10-14-2019 08:37 AM

LS FC gets around 8L/100 but I can push it to 12 if I'm constantly stomping on it

yray 10-14-2019 09:54 AM

cylinder deactivation

320icar 10-14-2019 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Money (Post 8963032)
to think the 2019 v6 ecoboost rocks 320hp stock and back in like 2005-2009 when it first released the v8 had 300 horsepower..
oof...technology,that's plenty of hp to get in some trouble and roast you're tires I

*i4 ecoboost, not v6

AstulzerRZD 10-14-2019 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr.Money (Post 8963032)
to think the 2019 v6 ecoboost rocks 320hp stock and back in like 2005-2009 when it first released the v8 had 300 horsepower..
oof...technology,that's plenty of hp to get in some trouble and roast you're tires I

The numbers on paper.... but it's a weaker down low, heat soaks & pulls timing really easily, and power falls off after 5.5k.

I would rather have had the V6 if it were still available.... but I do hear the Focus RS 2.3T is quite a bit better.

Badhobz 10-14-2019 02:37 PM

Plus it sounds like a god damn lawn mower.

AstulzerRZD 10-14-2019 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badhobz (Post 8963068)
Plus it sounds like a god damn lawn mower.

To be fair, I've had a few experiences where compact and midsize SUV drivers slow down in front of me on those 2/4 lane highways .... maybe they're triggered by the new exhaust note?

This didn't seem to be happen with the ecoboost

320icar 10-14-2019 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badhobz (Post 8963068)
Plus it sounds like a god damn lawn mower.

Absolutely. The ecoboost is a pretty great platform but fuck does it sound like trash

Thanksgiving cruise today

https://farm66.staticflickr.com/6553...5feed664_b.jpg

Badhobz 10-14-2019 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AstulzerRZD (Post 8963072)
To be fair, I've had a few experiences where compact and midsize SUV drivers slow down in front of me on those 2/4 lane highways .... maybe they're triggered by the new exhaust note?

This didn't seem to be happen with the ecoboost

Maybe. The burble is so good that they want to slow down and hear it some more hahaha..

dared3vil0 10-14-2019 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AstulzerRZD (Post 8963050)
The numbers on paper.... but it's a weaker down low, heat soaks & pulls timing really easily, and power falls off after 5.5k.

I would rather have had the V6 if it were still available.... but I do hear the Focus RS 2.3T is quite a bit better.

I had a 14 Mustang with the 305hp V6, I freakin loved that car.

When I bought my '19, I actually went to buy an ecoboost, but after driving it, although the speedometer said it was faster, it felt much slower than my old car. It just felt blah. While I love the 5.0l I ended up with, I really don't need 460hp. I would have really liked the 2.7 ecoboost in a Mustang, with a similar power figure to the Edge Sport (335 hp, 380 ft lbs)

2.3 just doesn't do it, and the 5.0l is nuts. Need something in between.

GS8 10-14-2019 10:04 PM

My brother's 2.7 Ecoboost in his Fusion Sport sounds like fake news

Spoiler!

twitchyzero 10-14-2019 10:09 PM

the 2016 v6 was my first convertible experience...great on the highway
i'm surprised ecoboost takes regular gas

320icar 10-14-2019 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by twitchyzero (Post 8963099)
the 2016 v6 was my first convertible experience...great on the highway
i'm surprised ecoboost takes regular gas

The mustang 2.3 can run regular gas, but you won’t get the advertised 300hp or whatever it’s rated at

hud 91gt 10-15-2019 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 320icar (Post 8963074)
Absolutely. The ecoboost is a pretty great platform but fuck does it sound like trash

Thanksgiving cruise today

https://farm66.staticflickr.com/6553...5feed664_b.jpg

I saw a red Focus pass me on the sea2sky. I was curious if that was you!?!

tofu1413 10-15-2019 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dared3vil0 (Post 8963097)
I had a 14 Mustang with the 305hp V6, I freakin loved that car.

When I bought my '19, I actually went to buy an ecoboost, but after driving it, although the speedometer said it was faster, it felt much slower than my old car. It just felt blah. While I love the 5.0l I ended up with, I really don't need 460hp. I would have really liked the 2.7 ecoboost in a Mustang, with a similar power figure to the Edge Sport (335 hp, 380 ft lbs)

2.3 just doesn't do it, and the 5.0l is nuts. Need something in between.


the current Coyote 5L is a wonderful engine. very flexible powerband, and it still revs up to the top end. I suspect it may feel a bit lazy because of its displacement and a heavier flywheel.

maybe fuel economy is decent because of gearing. i think the standard 5L gots some pretty tall final drives. performance package cars got a nicer off the line feel with shorter final drive.

but having said that.... the voodoo 5.2L is just...... :sweetjesus:

AstulzerRZD 10-15-2019 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tofu1413 (Post 8963114)
the current Coyote 5L is a wonderful engine. very flexible powerband, and it still revs up to the top end. I suspect it may feel a bit lazy because of its displacement and a heavier flywheel.

maybe fuel economy is decent because of gearing. i think the standard 5L gots some pretty tall final drives. performance package cars got a nicer off the line feel with shorter final drive.

but having said that.... the voodoo 5.2L is just...... :sweetjesus:

The Voodoo sound is amazing.
Did you see the new Corvette C8.R?
It also has a flat plane crank and is supposed to be derived from a road-going engine.


I've actually got the 10AT with both cars.
I've noticed that with the 5.0, it stays in 9th/10th going up hills on the highway whereas the 2.3T has to downshift to 6th and dig into boost just to maintain speed.

Badhobz 10-15-2019 08:57 AM

That’s sound is sexy as hell... almost exotic.

underscore 10-15-2019 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dared3vil0 (Post 8963097)
I would have really liked the 2.7 ecoboost in a Mustang, with a similar power figure to the Edge Sport (335 hp, 380 ft lbs)

2.3 just doesn't do it, and the 5.0l is nuts. Need something in between.

I'm guessing they didn't do that on purpose to avoid hurting 5.0 sales.

originalhypa 10-15-2019 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fliptuner (Post 8963038)
LS FC gets around 8L/100 but I can push it to 12 if I'm constantly stomping on it

How the hell.......

When I had my G8, the 6.0L was never under 14L/100km. It still had the cylinder deactivation too. It was a fun car to rip around in. Maybe my foot was a little heavy?

AstulzerRZD 10-15-2019 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by originalhypa (Post 8963124)
How the hell.......

When I had my G8, the 6.0L was never under 14L/100km. It still had the cylinder deactivation too. It was a fun car to rip around in. Maybe my foot was a little heavy?

Wonder if the FC is a lot lighter than the G8.
Those were under 3k lbs weren't they?

Whereas I'd expect the G8 to be over 4k.
Super cool car btw.
Dreamed of a G8 with Kooks headers all through high school.

tofu1413 10-15-2019 10:40 AM

holy crap. V8. hatch back with manual trans... 8L/100km/h....... with no fancy tech.

Good god. LSFC for all.

dared3vil0 10-15-2019 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tofu1413 (Post 8963114)
the current Coyote 5L is a wonderful engine. very flexible powerband, and it still revs up to the top end. I suspect it may feel a bit lazy because of its displacement and a heavier flywheel.

maybe fuel economy is decent because of gearing. i think the standard 5L gots some pretty tall final drives. performance package cars got a nicer off the line feel with shorter final drive.

but having said that.... the voodoo 5.2L is just...... :sweetjesus:

It's funny, my car is 3.55 geared car, which means in 10th at 120km/h it's at like 2100rpm, my buddy has the same car in a 3.15 gear that turn like 1600rpm, yet I get better fuel economy. I think it just stays in 10th and pulls, where as the highway gearset has to downshift and eat fuel.

Badhobz 10-15-2019 01:35 PM

Us V8 owners are literally burning money for additional “theatre”. I’m not happy until I hear some crackling and burbling as I lift off.

fliptuner 10-15-2019 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by originalhypa (Post 8963124)
How the hell.......

When I had my G8, the 6.0L was never under 14L/100km. It still had the cylinder deactivation too. It was a fun car to rip around in. Maybe my foot was a little heavy?

01 Camaro SS is around 37-3800lbs
88 FC is around 2700lbs

The drivetrain is probably about 100-130lbs heavier than the rotary but sans all AC related parts (including evap and box), PS, and emmisions, I'm guessing it's around 2800lbs.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net