![]() | |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://www.justin.threesixtyphoto.co.../Stag-0199.jpg San Diego Harbour from the Cruise Ship http://www.justin.threesixtyphoto.co.../Stag-0118.jpg Does anyone know what flower this is? http://www.justin.threesixtyphoto.co.../Stag-0265.jpg The cruise ship I was on. |
Here's mine taken with my Sony W55 @ night infront of my mom's house. http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2236/...c530fe60d5.jpg |
I love that one of the San Diego Harbour! :) |
Some photos of bridal fantasy dress rehearsal... Still going through the photos of the show! http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2276/...deb1419420.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2124/...7be380e05e.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2098/...e5ab1af307.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2053/...6eb56a39bb.jpg |
great captures! |
I know! I know! thats a purple flower! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
^^ aahahah. Looks like a Fido commercial! |
|
how do you guys focus on sport shots, just set it to Ai Servo and hope for the best? Or have them do it once, focus, then switch it to manual focus (so it doesn't change) and then have them do it again? |
Quote:
damn, what mountain is that? look at that pow. : o impossible, i thought it was all icy this week =( |
I usually use Ai servo and the high speed shutter. Improve the chances of getting something useable, and since it takes a while to reset for the shot, you don't have endless chances. That second shot was actually manually focused, an old pentax lens mounted on my 30D. I just tried to follow him the whole way down the line, did better than I thought I would have =) Kwazy - thats seymour last sunday |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nevermind... Firefox Exif Viewer plugin FTW :) Quote:
|
Ha ha, can only tell you so much when the lens has no electronics =) Lens length = 135mm (x1.6) Aperature = 5.6 (I think, can't quite remember) |
That's a sweet lens. |
5.6 sounds reasonable for that lighting. If you go by Sunny-16, ISO 160 would call for 1/160 at f/16... f/5.6 is 3 stops down from that... 1/1250 is almost exactly 3 stops faster (1/1280 would be 3 stops). Er... is 135 the actual focal length, or the "equivalent" for 1.6x? Fack, this equivalent stuff annoys me... focal length is focal length. |
Oh, and I have found that I normally use -2/3 compensation, and it looks good on the camera, but always to dark on the computer. So I have been trying to get away from that lately, hence the fairly neutral settings. |
ha ha, its a pentax super takumar 135/3.5 |
He has the Pentax M42 135mm f3.5 lens, so about 200mm equivalent. |
beat you =P |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:56 AM. | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net