REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-01-2011, 07:26 PM   #76
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by carisear View Post
a thousand years ago it was common knowledge the world was flat. it's that basic.


creationism was extremely accepted by scientists world wide at that time too.



see what i did there?



just because something is widely accepted by people doesn't necessarily mean its true.


Matthew 4:8, "The devil took him (Jesus) to a very high mountain and displayed before him all the kingdoms of the world in their magnificence...."


The only plausible reason for the "very high mountain" was that the altitude would make it possible to see to the ends of the earth. Only on a flat earth would this be remotely possible, so the New Testament writers were as ignorant as the Old.


Yea, people widely think the Earth was flat.... I wonder why...

Evolution is not a 'belief'. It's a straight up FACT. People widely believed in flat earth, but they didn't have the evidence to back it up as a fact.



Anyway, getting back on topic.
Fuck this science minister. SP makes a good point about economic recovery vs religious idiocy...
Advertisement
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 04-01-2011, 07:28 PM   #77
...in the world.
 
Ronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
I'm quite torn.

My values are mostly Liberal. I'm all about the economy. I could care less about welfare cases, immigrants, moral values and such. I'll support environmental reforms that won't cause me much of an inconvenience.

But Ignatieff seems like a douche. He hasn't done anything to convince me he's fit to lead the country. I'm slightly more convinced with him than Dion but still.

And I don't want to vote Conservative, Green, or NDP.
Ronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 07:33 PM   #78
...in the world.
 
Ronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo View Post
Yea, people widely think the Earth was flat.... I wonder why...

Evolution is not a 'belief'. It's a straight up FACT. People widely believed in flat earth, but they didn't have the evidence to back it up as a fact.

Anyway, getting back on topic.
Fuck this science minister. SP makes a good point about economic recovery vs religious idiocy...
During years and years of various chemistry, biology and anthropology classes at UBC, I've learned to never accept anything that isn't proven to be fact.

Evolution is not a fact. It is a theory. Unless something similar can be replicated or it's proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, it is not a fact. No one with brains is ever going to tell you evolution is a fact. Studies and experiments have supported the theory of evolution but that isn't proof. No one was there and no one can tell us for sure what happened.

I'm not saying evolution is true. I'm not saying creationism is true. Neither has been proven and therefore, neither is fact.
Ronin is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 04-01-2011, 07:35 PM   #79
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 54,436
Thanked 25,325 Times in 8,861 Posts
Failed 1,559 Times in 707 Posts
Evolution is indeed a theory, but it must be the theory we live by until we know better. Not some fucking story book.
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 07:36 PM   #80
...in the world.
 
Ronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp View Post
True, but to me personally, I think the economy is a more important issue than gay marriage and the like. Since the Tories are the only ones on the right side economically, my vote has to go that way.
I think the Liberals might actually have a better economic plan than the Conservatives...but I can see the Conservatives working it out as well.

Anything with moral issues such as drugs or gay marriage are just noise to me. The government shouldn't be responsible for stuff like this. The only lazy parents that think Marilyn Manson is responsible for Columbine give a shit.
Ronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 07:42 PM   #81
...in the world.
 
Ronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp View Post
Evolution is indeed a theory, but it must be the theory we live by until we know better. Not some fucking story book.
Not disagreeing. But I hate when people state evolution is a fact like they were there to watch the Big Bang. It's a theory just like the theory of intelligent design.

Anyone that dismisses creationism simply because of it's religion connotation is basically as moronic as religion nuts that won't listen to science. I'm rather sure I have all the information about both.
Ronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 07:49 PM   #82
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 54,436
Thanked 25,325 Times in 8,861 Posts
Failed 1,559 Times in 707 Posts
Anyone that dismisses creationism is an intelligent human being who hasn't been brainwashed.

If you do anything but dismiss the "facts" they go by, and not be religious yourself, then you're just dumb.

Evolutionism is a theory. Creationism is a goofy story people have been telling for a few years.
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 04-01-2011, 08:05 PM   #83
I don't get it
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: vancouver
Posts: 422
Thanked 259 Times in 88 Posts
Failed 282 Times in 74 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaupunkt69 View Post
The loss of the PC party to a merged Conservative party means there are less options for voters. Its a move towards a dysfunctional 2-party system like they have in the US. The more parties you have, the more likely you will find one that aligns with most of your ideologies
Like how the Liberals won back to back majorities when the PC/Reform vote was split?

The merger saved conservatism in Canada.
darkfroggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 08:56 PM   #84
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Abbotsford
Posts: 614
Thanked 107 Times in 23 Posts
Failed 77 Times in 9 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin View Post
Not disagreeing. But I hate when people state evolution is a fact like they were there to watch the Big Bang. It's a theory just like the theory of intelligent design.
Intelligent design is as much a theory as the flying spaghetti monster is. Just because you can't disprove it doesn't mean it's valid.


The theory of evolution is infinitely more valid and is heavily supported by empirical data.


I understand your point, but it is completely moot.
dutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 08:59 PM   #85
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin View Post
During years and years of various chemistry, biology and anthropology classes at UBC, I've learned to never accept anything that isn't proven to be fact.

Evolution is not a fact. It is a theory. Unless something similar can be replicated or it's proven beyond the shadow of a doubt, it is not a fact. No one with brains is ever going to tell you evolution is a fact. Studies and experiments have supported the theory of evolution but that isn't proof. No one was there and no one can tell us for sure what happened.

I'm not saying evolution is true. I'm not saying creationism is true. Neither has been proven and therefore, neither is fact.
This is wrong, and means you have not looked into the evidence into Evolution enough.

You can call Evolution a Theory if you want, but it's really a fact.
Are you really going to say the same thing about "Germ Theory", "Kinetic Molecular Theory", "Big Bang Theory", "Quantum Theory"?


Aren't they just theories too?? How is evolutionary theory any different? Are you telling me you don't know the previous theories I listed to be true, either?


"Theory" is a bit of a misnomer. Evolutionary Theory is everything we know in evolution in facts (like, allele crossing, gene pools), unified together in a harmonizing theory.

The fact that evolution occurs is absolutely true, documented by PLENTY of evidence.

This is going further off-topic, but I felt it needed to be address.

Last edited by LiquidTurbo; 04-01-2011 at 09:04 PM.
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 09:17 PM   #86
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkfroggy View Post
Like how the Liberals won back to back majorities when the PC/Reform vote was split?

The merger saved conservatism in Canada.
Think about what your saying. If you are saying majority it doesn't mean shit if the cons had one party.
Posted via RS Mobile
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 11:47 PM   #87
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Bouncing Bettys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bootyville
Posts: 4,638
Thanked 2,617 Times in 900 Posts
Failed 496 Times in 162 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkfroggy View Post
Like how the Liberals won back to back majorities when the PC/Reform vote was split?

The merger saved conservatism in Canada.
saved it from what? The Liberals were winning majorities while the left had more than one party to choose from and they were getting votes in Quebec as well. The main idea I was getting at was its important to have a multiple party system so voters have less to compromise on when choosing a candidate. This was reflected by some of the responses to this quiz ie. Liberal-leaning conservatives who don't support the social conservatism.
__________________
LEAFS!
Bouncing Bettys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2011, 11:54 PM   #88
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
Manic!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 17,090
Thanked 8,141 Times in 3,821 Posts
Failed 1,514 Times in 651 Posts
For people voting conservative because of the economy:

__________________
Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
Manic! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2011, 12:05 AM   #89
I don't get it
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: vancouver
Posts: 422
Thanked 259 Times in 88 Posts
Failed 282 Times in 74 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MajinHurricane View Post
Think about what your saying. If you are saying majority it doesn't mean shit if the cons had one party.
Posted via RS Mobile
Think about what you're saying.

I'll illustrate with an example.

Liberal Party: 18000 votes
Reform Party: 14000 votes
Progressive Conservative: 10000 votes

"Conservative" votes: 24000
Liberal votes: 18000

A majority of the population is Conservative, yet the riding goes to the Liberals. Now, repeat this across numerous ridings. See how vote-splitting can give parties majority governments?

If they were both united under one party, then the "Conservatives" would have easily taken this riding.

Also see: strategic voting.
darkfroggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2011, 05:54 AM   #90
My bookmarks are Reddit and REVscene, in that order
 
Culverin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,442
Thanked 13,465 Times in 1,814 Posts
Failed 1,625 Times in 307 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidTurbo View Post


Matthew 4:8, "The devil took him (Jesus) to a very high mountain and displayed before him all the kingdoms of the world in their magnificence...."


The only plausible reason for the "very high mountain" was that the altitude would make it possible to see to the ends of the earth. Only on a flat earth would this be remotely possible, so the New Testament writers were as ignorant as the Old.

Wow, you're taking that literally and making a really bad assumption there.
Why are you thinking that it's "the only plausible reason for the very high mountain" There's a lot of imagery and emotion that is brought to you seeing the world from up above. If I told you you could be king of Vancouver, wouldn't it help just a little if I took you to the top of Grouse? You're trying to tell me that the view there wouldn't move you emotionally at all?

You don't have the believe the bible. Nobody is making you.
But please don't jump to asinine assumptions thinking everything written down is wrong. I think your fellow atheists are just a little ashamed of you.
Think a little with basic logic before you speak?



Anyways, back on topic. You know how people say that Middle canada has all the vote, and here in the west, our voices are never heard? What is that that we want here in the west that they don't want in the east? I'd assume it's all the same thing?
__________________
***Sarlo's Awesome Eatery ***
Facebook // Instagram
Culverin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2011, 03:24 PM   #91
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Delta
Posts: 864
Thanked 47 Times in 36 Posts
Failed 125 Times in 40 Posts
im pretty disappointed with who we have to vote for...

they all pretty much suck, but the one party thats against MORE gun control are the converses..
so it comes down to who doesn't want to take my guns away.
baggdis300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2011, 04:07 PM   #92
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkfroggy View Post
Think about what you're saying.

I'll illustrate with an example.

Liberal Party: 18000 votes
Reform Party: 14000 votes
Progressive Conservative: 10000 votes

"Conservative" votes: 24000
Liberal votes: 18000

A majority of the population is Conservative, yet the riding goes to the Liberals. Now, repeat this across numerous ridings. See how vote-splitting can give parties majority governments?

If they were both united under one party, then the "Conservatives" would have easily taken this riding.

Also see: strategic voting.
Irrelevent again. Just because someone voted cons pre merger doesn't mean they would vote them pro, especially during a different time of politics.
Posted via RS Mobile
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2011, 04:08 PM   #93
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
culverin: economic resources. And more voice in the senate.
Posted via RS Mobile

Also how do you think alberta feels, picking up economic fail provinces.
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2011, 05:43 PM   #94
I don't get it
 
alwaysideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 430
Thanked 25 Times in 12 Posts
Failed 1 Time in 1 Post
Love how a political thread turned into a religious debate...LOL

In the end it doesn't matter which party you vote for, whos right and whos wrong...what really matters is that people actually get out and do it. I would love to see how many people on here leaning hard one way or the other find some excuse to get out to the polls in May.....It makes me very sad inside to think of all those that gave their lives willingly to protect the democratic process through the ages and for the majority to not give 2 shits about voting
alwaysideways is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2011, 06:30 PM   #95
Banned By Establishment
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 12,484
Thanked 2,091 Times in 773 Posts
Failed 765 Times in 247 Posts
^or vote conservative
Meowjin is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 04-02-2011, 07:04 PM   #96
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Bouncing Bettys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bootyville
Posts: 4,638
Thanked 2,617 Times in 900 Posts
Failed 496 Times in 162 Posts
Well the election just came to my front door. My local NDP candidate just came by. He was well informed of the Water Treatment industry I am currently a student of which impressed me. Beats all the junk mail I've been getting from the Conservative MP over the last couple years including a real gem of a Canadian flag print with her name on it.
__________________
LEAFS!
Bouncing Bettys is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 04-02-2011, 08:27 PM   #97
I don't get it
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: vancouver
Posts: 422
Thanked 259 Times in 88 Posts
Failed 282 Times in 74 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic! View Post
For people voting conservative because of the economy:

This, this, and this.

Remember that Harper wanted to LOOSEN the controls on banking. now he's saying we have to best banking world in the system, etc.

Harper did NOT do a lot for the economy, as Canada was already doing well to begin with. You can thank the Liberals for not deregulating the banks a-la the US system.

That being said, a lot of things have changed. You shouldn't vote Liberal just because Martin managed it well.
darkfroggy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 04-03-2011, 09:01 AM   #98
...in the world.
 
Ronin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 28,466
Thanked 7,636 Times in 2,321 Posts
Failed 609 Times in 221 Posts
LOL my friend just sent me a picture of Alice Wong, Richmond's conservative MP, sleeping in church. Just full on slumped over from boredom
Posted via RS Mobile
Ronin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2011, 09:03 AM   #99
resident Oil Guru
 
LiquidTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,716
Thanked 10,457 Times in 1,794 Posts
Failed 1,065 Times in 267 Posts
^ post
LiquidTurbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2011, 10:46 AM   #100
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Delta
Posts: 864
Thanked 47 Times in 36 Posts
Failed 125 Times in 40 Posts
x2

your buddy should leak it to the media and PROFIT!
baggdis300 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net