REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   Vancouver's Real Estate Market (https://www.revscene.net/forums/674709-vancouvers-real-estate-market.html)

whitev70r 07-28-2025 10:27 AM

yah, I know ... success rate (if determined by staying together and not divorce) is about the same in arranged marriages vs. Western dating method leading to marriage.

I think the Harmony, Plenty of Fish, whatever dating app experiment has shown that it is no better than the wisdom of 2 sets of parents. :lol

Hondaracer 07-28-2025 10:32 AM

The Indian arranged marriages the wife is basically a slave

Saw this a lot while working at Telus, it’s akin to what you see in like the sopranos etc. the husband is off doing god knows what and the wife runs ever aspect of the house, bills, maintenance, family affairs etc. lol it’s pretty painful.

Eff-1 07-28-2025 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by whitev70r (Post 9187243)
^ that's nothing! I always how modern buddy gals succumb to arrange marriages in this era of 2020 in Canada !!!

If you are willing to do arranged marriage, having parents, uncles, aunts live with you is part of the package.

Modern arranged marriage is more like arranged dating. Your parents set you up with people to meet, but if there's no interest, you're not obligated to continue the relationship. But it really all depends on the families and how traditional they are(n't).

Most everything in India is grounded in religion, so even if you are a 1st generation in Canada born in Canada, if you grew up in a religious household and chose to continue to follow the religion as you grow up, then theres a higher chance arranged marriage is something you'd be more open to.

First generation Sikhs for example who follow the traditions of turbans etc, a lot of those kids are still going with arranged marriages.

Eff-1 07-28-2025 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hondaracer (Post 9187250)
The Indian arranged marriages the wife is basically a slave

Saw this a lot while working at Telus, it’s akin to what you see in like the sopranos etc. the husband is off doing god knows what and the wife runs ever aspect of the house, bills, maintenance, family affairs etc. lol it’s pretty painful.

I'm going to guess that maybe some Telus workers who immigrated to Canada and brought their partners over might be like that, but that's not representative of the community as a whole.

Hondaracer 07-28-2025 10:38 AM

I’m saying me, going into homes, seeing what I presumed to be an arranged marriage between older Indian families. Albeit arranged or not the attitude is likely the same with the older generations.

GLOW 07-28-2025 10:54 AM

is divorce between those traditional arranged marriages common, or being common?

i imagine living in the west it may be a more common occurrence due to rights, women around them here in their ear, etc.

unit 07-28-2025 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bcrdukes (Post 9187248)
noclue is Indian? I must be blind! :o

i swear people should have skin colour tags under their avatars

Badhobz 07-28-2025 11:02 AM

^does your say SPIC !?!?!

edit: also i read that as skin tags... i was like WTF!?

CivicBlues 07-28-2025 11:04 AM

Back in the day, lotta young Brown guys went around with non-brown girls aka white chicks. I don't think any of them stayed together right? I mean they were just all fooling around waiting for their parents to pick their bride?

Gotta hand it to them though, in 50 years there will still be a definable "Brown" community, whereas East Asians here will all be Hapas, mullattos or whatever we call them now...basically whites.

Eff-1 07-28-2025 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GLOW (Post 9187256)
is divorce between those traditional arranged marriages common, or being common?

i imagine living in the west it may be a more common occurrence due to rights, women around them here in their ear, etc.

Divorce in india never easy, even at the best of times. And there's a cultural stigma that gets attached to divorced women. So I'd imagine that you're probaby right.

Badhobz 07-28-2025 11:09 AM

you can blame bitch ass 69styles for diluting our gene pool. he single handly porked half the chinese bitches in richmond... god knows how many mutts are running around with his genes.....

DISGUSTING

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F7-tl4JXYAAgD0O.jpg

CivicBlues 07-28-2025 11:18 AM

When I was in India, I rarely ever saw any women walking around on the streets. It was almost always 95% men with one or two old aunties in saris. I could be wrong but "organic" dating doesn't seem to be very big there.

yray 07-28-2025 11:28 AM

since we are talking about indians...

so what's with indians bringing the tractors and putting it infront of their houses?

GS8 07-28-2025 11:37 AM

Part of Indian 'contractual obligations' are keeping wealth in the family. Better to arrange with another rich family and keep your little empire growing, whether the bride and groom enjoy each other or not.

Im guessing with enough family pressure, they'll be forced to enjoy or will be distracted enough by a household of 21 people to even remember they have a spouse.

Then they'll have kids who will just scream relentlessly for some reason while they do nothing cuz they'll be too busy talking to their 7th cousin on speakerphone at max volume, despite holding the phone almost to their ear.

mikemhg 07-28-2025 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 6793026 (Post 9187218)
There are SOOO many fookers that i woudl never ever tell parents to pay out.

My cousin had the audacity to go to their 75 yr old parent "i want to take my family of 4 - kid is 5 and 9 to HK, please take out your GIC that's 20k and give / lend to me" WTF

Family friend married 2nd time and sent mother in law at old age home (it was agreed as she was almost blind); he thought, man, your mom is in her mid 80s.. she might be there for 2-3 yrs. Well she outlived the daughter (cancer) and didn't pass away until early 90s. That's a sold 8-10 yrs of 2-3000 a month (back 20 yrs ago) of old age home fees.

SOmetimes it's just good to hold on to their money. There is a chinese saying "Even your blood born son won't be as valuable as your cash onhand).

Good luck asking your son if you can move in and having them take care of you without cash.

GOod luck getting someone to wipe your butt when you have dementia.

I tell my parent, do not give me anything or my brother. I made a bond with wife that we will have parents move in with us anytime but regardless.. dont' give us money, your presence / dim sum / dinner with us is all we need.

This 100%.

My mother is in an old folk's home and doesn't have a pot to piss in to leave behind, my father does have some money saved he plans to leave for me (around $200K, give or take), but he's 72.

I could never imagine asking him for any of that early. He has no other family here in Canada, so if something happened to him health wise, he'd need that money. It would be unfair to expect such an ask from a parent who at the same time might need that nest egg for themselves.

Badhobz 07-28-2025 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GS8 (Post 9187274)
Part of Indian 'contractual obligations' are keeping wealth in the family. Better to arrange with another rich family and keep your little empire growing, whether the bride and groom enjoy each other or not.

Im guessing with enough family pressure, they'll be forced to enjoy or will be distracted enough by a household of 21 people to even remember they have a spouse.

Then they'll have kids who will just scream relentlessly for some reason while they do nothing cuz they'll be too busy talking to their 7th cousin on speakerphone at max volume, despite holding the phone almost to their ear.

https://media.tenor.com/-Rug48uNPHsAAAAM/fwpraj-fwp.gif

JDMDreams 07-28-2025 01:49 PM

In for the stonings. :accepted:

GS8 07-28-2025 02:36 PM

If my parents were gen x, they'd have like zero assets while renting a shitty apartment in Edmonds, but since they're boomers, they lucked out and had it fine but not great.

For their age, they are pretty springy so I don't see old folks home in their future but I do see them dying of boredom :lol

My dad was telling me about all his home expenses in the last couple of years and im like ooof. The house is still a future teardown regardless :lol :lol

CivicBlues 07-28-2025 02:46 PM

So my parents are convinced that when they pass on the family home to me that I'll have to pay capital gains taxes on their original purchase price from like 1989. So mucho bigly tax bill headed my way because it won't be my primary residence. So they're being convinced by their Investment Advisor to purchase "insurance" to cover this unexpected cost.

This sounds kinda fishy, nothing I've read indicates this and it makes sense to me that the average cost base is calculated upon transference at death when I decide to sell. Anyone have experience with this and can confirm?? I've asked them to speak to a lawyer and not just take a salesman at the bank at face value.

RevYouUp 07-28-2025 03:32 PM

If it’s your parents principal residence there won’t be taxes payable for them. It is considered a deem disposition when they pass the property down to you. The fair market value of the property will be your cost basis if you consider selling it after.

68style 07-28-2025 03:35 PM

Why would anyone think they can buy insurance against taxes? Lol

CivicBlues 07-28-2025 03:39 PM

Fair market value at time of disposition right? Not at time of original purchase (1989).

Yeah I dunno the right terminology, "insurance" is in quotes, its more like a savings account to pay off future taxes.

Badhobz 07-28-2025 03:52 PM

Why don’t they just sell it and then go rent a place and give you cash.

That’s what I’m going to get my parents to do. Before they kick the bucket. Sell the place. Then hand me the cash and go rent (in a care home )

ssjGoku69 07-28-2025 03:56 PM

Yep, your parent's sale price would be your cost.

Parents POV: $2.2M sale price – $200k cost = $2.0M non-taxable gain on principal residence.
Your POV: $Future Value – $2.2M cost = $??? unknown future taxable gain on sale/gain on disposal

You won't incur any taxes until you sell. Don't need a seperate savings since the future proceeds from the sale can be used for the future tax liability.


Goku69, CPA

supafamous 07-28-2025 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CivicBlues (Post 9187320)
So my parents are convinced that when they pass on the family home to me that I'll have to pay capital gains taxes on their original purchase price from like 1989. So mucho bigly tax bill headed my way because it won't be my primary residence. So they're being convinced by their Investment Advisor to purchase "insurance" to cover this unexpected cost.

This sounds kinda fishy, nothing I've read indicates this and it makes sense to me that the average cost base is calculated upon transference at death when I decide to sell. Anyone have experience with this and can confirm?? I've asked them to speak to a lawyer and not just take a salesman at the bank at face value.

That advisor sounds like a scam artist. There's no taxes to pay at the time the house switches over to you other than probate and I believe you either have a year or till end of year before you'd be on the hook for any cap gains that occur after that IF it's not your principal residence.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net