REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Auto Chat

Vancouver Auto Chat 2016 VAC Community Head Moderator: Raid3n

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2014, 12:33 PM   #51
RS Veteran
 
bcrdukes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GTA
Posts: 29,013
Thanked 10,501 Times in 4,306 Posts
I was so pissed off at the guys @ Regency Toyota because there was no option available to wrap the dash in sting ray or crocodile skin. And the shift knob, holy, don't even. I wanted it to be ivory, straight from an elephant from Chad or Cameroon. Idiots there couldn't even accommodate that.

I can assure you the folks at Toyota Canada are very upset in receiving my customer feedback form, which I so carefully submitted to them via Home | Scion Canada.
Advertisement
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badhobz View Post
Yeah. Typical Mainlander Barbie doll.

Her car even smelled nice. Like a mixture of luxury perfume and a hint of….. vag ? Fish sauce ? Something a bit dank
bcrdukes is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-06-2014, 12:37 PM   #52
I'll never be Diggy, no matter how hard I try
 
trollguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: ☺
Posts: 5,011
Thanked 2,111 Times in 633 Posts
carefully submitted? not in haste? you sure?
trollguy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-06-2014, 12:39 PM   #53
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,643
Thanked 597 Times in 340 Posts
Test drove an 07 cayman s in auto (yah, yah...) late last yr. Hands down the handling is phenomenal. Power delivery was surprisingly good. Granted I dont drive a lot of super cars but ive been in the car industry for 14 yrs. Almost bought it if it wasnt for some other guy that walked in and paid over asking price....needless to say I was kinda choked..lol
Posted via RS Mobile
6thGear. is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 12:45 PM   #54
I contribute to threads in the offtopic forum
 
radioman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,737
Thanked 3,242 Times in 861 Posts
What about the Genesis Coupe
radioman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 12:57 PM   #55
Wunder? Wonder?? Wander???
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: vancouver
Posts: 217
Thanked 542 Times in 57 Posts
Good video on the GT86 vs used Cayman S vs 370z

KayC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 01:12 PM   #56
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Mr.Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,317
Thanked 566 Times in 174 Posts
As a FRS owner I do plan to own a Cayman down the line as it does everything the FRS does but better all while being quiet and having much more potential

That being said I can't afford the upkeep of a Porsche so I threw a turbo on my FRS to keep me happy for now

The biggest thing tho is for how cheap the FRS is we are comparing it to a car way out of its class. This IMO speaks volumes about how good the platform is however I do agree the FRS isn't for the mass market these days as 200hp in mordern times is laughable
__________________
Spoiler!

Last edited by Mr.Jay; 03-06-2014 at 01:41 PM.
Mr.Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-06-2014, 01:30 PM   #57
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
roastpuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 5,123
Thanked 2,779 Times in 1,173 Posts
Go talk to GolfRSI (aka Driving Vancouver). He owns a BRZ as a DD now, and used to own a Cayman.

http://www.revscene.net/forums/68605...couver-ca.html

He did do a video that somewhat compares the BRZ to the E90 M3 and Cayman.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by HollyZ32 View Post
i look so damn white in all the pics! lol
fml
roastpuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 01:40 PM   #58
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 163
Thanked 117 Times in 46 Posts
Reading others' statements about how the FR-S is "underpowered" bewilders me.

Remember the DC2 Integra Type R? How about the RSX Type S? Remember how they felt? Well, their numbers are about 0.17 hp/kg and 0.16 hp/kg, respectively.

The FR-S has a nearly identical 0.16 hp/kg rating, and a greater lb/ft of torque per kg than both those cars. Oh, and that power comes at the same astronomical reading on the tachometer as the others.

I've driven all three cars on a number of occasions and can safely say that at least in terms seat-of-the-pants power, they are practically equal.

I don't think I've ever heard anyone say that the Type R and Type S are underpowered, and so wonder where you monkeys get the idea that the FR-S is underpowered. Unless your daily driver is an Italian exotic.
ScratchedMy991 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 03-06-2014, 01:51 PM   #59
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,452
Thanked 2,667 Times in 960 Posts
Get the FR-S and drive the absolute balls off of it!!!
multicartual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 01:58 PM   #60
14 dolla balla aint got nothing on me!
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 675
Thanked 1,859 Times in 254 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrahamD View Post
FRS+turbo?
Turbocharging is great, but I don't think strapping a turbo to a FR-S can match the overall polished, balance, togetherness feel of the more powerful NA Cayman.

The lack of power really annoys you driving around town. But once you rip her down a mountain road or hit the track, you tend to forget its lack of power... until you get smoked by another car. The DC2/ RSX-S don't feel as underpowered because of the engine. This boxer units got a terrible torque dip right around 3500rpm and the top end is nothing as ferocious as those Honda motors.

Still I think the Cayman is a better all rounder car on and off the track, the FR-S is like a watered down, tamer, cheaper, easier S2000 if that make any sense. To be honest, sometimes I wish Toyota would sell the FR-S under Lexus, they can charge more and offer more power, refinement and I can live with the increased price no problem.

This is a car you have to beat around, drive the balls off to fall in love with.
JoshuaWong is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-06-2014, 02:06 PM   #61
Banned (ABWS)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,452
Thanked 2,667 Times in 960 Posts
The FR-S looks awesome, the Cayman just looks like a baby Porsche that a rich asshole would buy for his 16 year old daughter
multicartual is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 02:42 PM   #62
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 163
Thanked 117 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshuaWong View Post
This boxer units got a terrible torque dip right around 3500rpm and the top end is nothing as ferocious as those Honda motors.
I understand the dip you're referring to. The Type S' torque curve is relatively linear.

If you look at the torque curve of the ITR, however, it does the same thing as the FR-S' - a dip occurs at about 3500rpm. I suppose the difference here is that the ITR experiences only about a 10% drop in power, whereas the FR-S loses about 15%.

Yet, does that make much of a difference? Power is returned 1000rpm later in the FR-S whereas the ITR needs an additional 1000rpm. Given, torque continues to increase from that point on in the ITR whereas it remains flat for the FR-S.

Little nuances aside, the numbers suggest that the "feel" of these cars should be practically identical. Or maybe I just need some thinner underwear.
ScratchedMy991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 02:43 PM   #63
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BC
Posts: 5,239
Thanked 4,905 Times in 1,655 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScratchedMy991 View Post
Reading others' statements about how the FR-S is "underpowered" bewilders me.

Remember the DC2 Integra Type R? How about the RSX Type S? Remember how they felt? Well, their numbers are about 0.17 hp/kg and 0.16 hp/kg, respectively.

The FR-S has a nearly identical 0.16 hp/kg rating, and a greater lb/ft of torque per kg than both those cars. Oh, and that power comes at the same astronomical reading on the tachometer as the others.

I've driven all three cars on a number of occasions and can safely say that at least in terms seat-of-the-pants power, they are practically equal.

I don't think I've ever heard anyone say that the Type R and Type S are underpowered, and so wonder where you monkeys get the idea that the FR-S is underpowered. Unless your daily driver is an Italian exotic.
...And what years were the DC2's and the RSX Type S' manufactured? Same power ratio today as 1998 (for the ITR) doesn't cut it anymore...
__________________
2021 F150 Platinum FX4

2021 Mustang GT PP1 6MT
dared3vil0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 02:58 PM   #64
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 163
Thanked 117 Times in 46 Posts
^ Point taken. Time definitely affects our judgement of what is "fast" or "powerful".

But the time needed for that change is long. Not 10 years long. More like 30 years long.

As well, compare those ratios to that of most other automobiles over the same time span. I'm sure you'll find things in the past 15 years have only been met with minor increases.

Some things will always remain the same. 50 years ago, benching 500lbs was a tremendous feat. I'll bet in another 50 years, it will remain a tremendous feat.
ScratchedMy991 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 03:02 PM   #65
I'll never be Diggy, no matter how hard I try
 
trollguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: ☺
Posts: 5,011
Thanked 2,111 Times in 633 Posts
You can't compare it to benching IMHO.

Technology changes..
trollguy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-06-2014, 03:02 PM   #66
OMGWTFBBQ is a common word I say everyday
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BC
Posts: 5,239
Thanked 4,905 Times in 1,655 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScratchedMy991 View Post
^ Point taken. Time definitely affects our judgement of what is "fast" or "powerful".

But the time needed for that change is long. Not 10 years long. More like 30 years long.

As well, compare those ratios to that of most other automobiles over the same time span. I'm sure you'll find things in the past 15 years have only been met with minor increases.

Some things will always remain the same. 50 years ago, benching 500lbs was a tremendous feat. I'll bet in another 50 years, it will remain a tremendous feat.
Well yeah, because cars evolve about a billion times faster than humans...
__________________
2021 F150 Platinum FX4

2021 Mustang GT PP1 6MT
dared3vil0 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-06-2014, 03:03 PM   #67
RS Veteran
 
bcrdukes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GTA
Posts: 29,013
Thanked 10,501 Times in 4,306 Posts
do you even lift?
Spoiler!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badhobz View Post
Yeah. Typical Mainlander Barbie doll.

Her car even smelled nice. Like a mixture of luxury perfume and a hint of….. vag ? Fish sauce ? Something a bit dank
bcrdukes is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
This post FAILED by:
Old 03-06-2014, 03:07 PM   #68
I only answer to my username, my real name is Irrelevant!
 
StylinRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CELICAland
Posts: 25,651
Thanked 10,381 Times in 3,907 Posts
I'm a proponent of buying new. I realize there are a lot of great cars to be had used but I'm always wary of anything that's out of warranty and the unknown that surrounds how previous owners drove/treated their cars. Plus there's the joy of having something new

So if it were me i'd go the frs/brz

you could say i like my cars like i like my women
StylinRed is online now   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-06-2014, 03:12 PM   #69
What hasn't Killed me, has made me more tolerant of RS!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 163
Thanked 117 Times in 46 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dared3vil0 View Post
Well yeah, because cars evolve about a billion times faster than humans...
Listen carefully....did you hear that? That was you missing my point.
ScratchedMy991 is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 03-06-2014, 03:19 PM   #70
I'll never be Diggy, no matter how hard I try
 
trollguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: ☺
Posts: 5,011
Thanked 2,111 Times in 633 Posts
you know, a new camry does 0-60 faster than an FRS.
trollguy is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-06-2014, 03:37 PM   #71
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Mr.Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,317
Thanked 566 Times in 174 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowguy View Post
you know, a new camry does 0-60 faster than an FRS.
haha your point?



Faster 1/4 mile time than muscle cars too


2012 Toyota Camry V6 does 0-60 mph in 5.7s

The 2011 Cayman he wants does it in 5.4s

What you really proved is sedan these days are packing huge power

pretty pointless IMO unless its all you care about
__________________
Spoiler!
Mr.Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 03:38 PM   #72
I *heart* Revscene.net very Muchie
 
boostfever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Shore
Posts: 3,624
Thanked 7,355 Times in 1,044 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by StylinRed View Post
I'm a proponent of buying new. I realize there are a lot of great cars to be had used but I'm always wary of anything that's out of warranty and the unknown that surrounds how previous owners drove/treated their cars. Plus there's the joy of having something new

So if it were me i'd go the frs/brz

you could say i like my cars like i like my women
you would be surprised at how reliable a Cayman is. and even more surprised at how inexpensive aftermarket warranties are for Porsches.
Easycare covers German cars pretty well.
boostfever is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 03-06-2014, 03:48 PM   #73
I'll never be Diggy, no matter how hard I try
 
trollguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: ☺
Posts: 5,011
Thanked 2,111 Times in 633 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Jay View Post
haha your point?

Faster 1/4 mile time than muscle cars too

2012 Toyota Camry V6 does 0-60 mph in 5.7s

The 2011 Cayman he wants does it in 5.4s

What you really proved is sedan these days are packing huge power

pretty pointless IMO unless its all you care about
I think you proved my point about technology changing.. and consumer expectations over time.

and ironic post considering aren't you putting a turbo in yours?
trollguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 03:52 PM   #74
kwy
My homepage has been set to RS
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,397
Thanked 1,715 Times in 595 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by boostfever View Post
you would be surprised at how reliable a Cayman is. and even more surprised at how inexpensive aftermarket warranties are for Porsches.
Easycare covers German cars pretty well.
Sorry to go off on a slight tangent, but what other aftermarket warranty companies would you suggest that offer coverage in Canada?

Feel free to PM me if you would like, thanks.
kwy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2014, 04:18 PM   #75
Even when im right, revscene.net is still right!
 
Mr.Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vancity
Posts: 1,317
Thanked 566 Times in 174 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowguy View Post
I think you proved my point about technology changing.. and consumer expectations over time.

and ironic post considering aren't you putting a turbo in yours?
I agree with your point about tech but I thought just saying a Camry is faster than a FRS and leaving it at that is kinda silly considering the Camry is pretty fast for what it is. Hell one of those vids is a older Camry beating a newer Camaro. Also the spec you choose is a tad unfair imo as the FRS has to hit 3rd gear to hit 60mph which is not the case with the Camry.

Not sure what's ironic about the post as I agree the FRS is slow. I put a turbo in mine because its depressing being able to pass someone in the corners then they passing you on a straight away. I think I prob would of been fine NA if I just did autox but I really want to track more. (I know should of sc but turbo is more gas friendly lol)

My point is just Camry is sleeper beast lol
__________________
Spoiler!
Mr.Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net