dam 50 pages already lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i think Garrison was just alright. but getting paid ~4.6M is just too much for that considering the nucks already have Edler ~ 5m Bieksa 4.6 Hamhuis 4.5 And Garrison i dont think differentiated himself from the pack too much Just not the right fit at the moment for the team moving forward Benning is probably also betting quite a bit on Tanev to step up. must really like his potential. i think he can find his offensive side as well I am hoping that 6'7 russian D the nucks drafted this year has a chris pronger like demeanour. they need someone mean back there. Bieksa is tough as nails, but just wish he was bigger to be even more intimidating |
New Maple Leafs center Petri Kontiola is a heck of an interview Quote:
Quote:
https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nh...140127382.html |
^Kessel will have to take him under his wing and show him how to handle the media in Toronto like a pro. http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view6/394...l-kessel-o.gif |
Kassian for 1.75m leaves 5m for Vey, Tanev, and probably Weber Sign all three and maybe lose Markstrom's 1.2m so 6.2m. |
Great deal for Kassian at $1.75m. He got better as the season went on so $1.75m for 2 is a good deal to see if he grows beyond that. Still 23 and massive...at worst, we'll just have him hit things. |
Quote:
|
Nice Canucks officially signed Weber as well, now only Tanev is left |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
So 4.1mil for vey and tanev.... 2.5 for tanev and 1.6 for vey? |
Quote:
:fulloffuck: :sweetjesus: |
1.6 for vey seems like a lot? I don't know much about the guy but it doesn't look like he has much NHL experience. I expect Tanev to comand 3 over 3 or more. |
Quote:
I'd expect somewhere between $2M and $3.5M for Tanev, depending on term. He really hasn't established himself as more than a reliable #4/#5 and he is an RFA, albeit with arbitration rights. |
David Legwand to Ottawa for 2yrs 6million |
Vey I can see at 1.0 - 1.2 MAX on a 2-3 year deal. He had an AAV of 900k (770K + bonuses) last season. 1.6M is a retarded amount for someone who hasn't done anything at the NHL level...but then again, it wouldn't surprise me anymore. |
Pierre McGuire said earlier today that he doesn't expect Tanev to command a lot. He said last contract was a bridge contract, same this time. For a defensive defenceman who's RFA as well, he expects a slight bump in salary increase from his previous one. He's still expecting Canucks to kick the tires on Tyler Myers too. |
Pierre hasn't had a legit lead In the last year I've heard him talk |
Side note on Pierre, is he back with TSN now? I saw him on the draft show but last I heard he left TSN to do NBC or something like that? |
He's just mad he couldn't land a GM job. |
I'm very curious as to what they are going to do with Lack and Markstrom. If they want to trade, then Lack seems like he would fetch a better return. If they waive, it makes more sense to waive Markstrom and send him to the AHL. Though that gives us a bunch of problems. Who's going to be interested in taking Lack, and we are going to get nearly nothing in return. And if we waive Markstrom, I'm pretty sure some one will claim him, which makes the Luu trade even more ugly. In the long run, we have a ton of goalies in the pipeline - Markstrom, Erikkson, Cannata, and that new guy we just drafted. Are the Canucks trying to make a living of developing then selling off goalies? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:44 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net