REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   Trump thread 2.0 (https://www.revscene.net/forums/714831-trump-thread-2-0-a.html)

68style 10-16-2020 11:28 AM

Where did you get the idea those flights were ever shut down?

They never were.

You just couldn’t enter if you were a foreign national. That’s not the same thing at all come on man.

Virus was already in the USA before there anyway... the response to that was a massive failure irregardless of supposed flight shutdowns. The airlines themselves did more shutdown than Trump ever did.

welfare 10-16-2020 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 68style (Post 9002815)
Where did you get the idea those flights were ever shut down?

They never were.

You just couldn’t enter if you were a foreign national. That’s not the same thing at all come on man...

That's still more than our government did

underscore 10-16-2020 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikemhg (Post 9002799)
:lol

You know, I've been giving a lot of thought to this in terms of this whole concept of "fake news". Google and Facebook are somewhat in a tricky position here that I wouldn't envy, and I don't think there's a clear answer. It's somewhat of a damned if you do, damned if you don't scenario.

-Allow Trump and the Republicans to release these fabricated stories, and not censor > This allows the lie to propagate online.

-Censor the fabricated story and lie > Provides more credence to story's validity to the bootlicking supporters via making them think the media is trying to "cover it up", conspiracy, etc.

I honestly don't know the best option here.

The cult is hopeless when it comes to stuff like this. If it's something they want to believe then:

Not censored = it's true because they aren't denying it
Censored = it's true because they're covering it up

But if it's something they don't want to believe then:

Not censored = fake news
Censored = proof everything that isn't censored is also incorrect

They'll never change their minds because they have to believe they're smarter than everyone else at all costs and are impossible to reason with, so the best option is to not waste time on them (I've given up on several that I know) and focus on some level of maintaining accurate information for normal people.

unit 10-16-2020 11:38 AM

trump tries to distance himself from Qanon just enough, but not enough to alienate his base... hilarious that he says he doesn't know who Qanon is after retweeting them countless times in the past. he knows that his followers are all dumbass conspiracy theorists and he literally needs votes from these people if he is to have any chance to win.

CivicBlues 10-16-2020 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002816)
That's still more than our government did

Ah yes, let's compare things that our governments did that DIDN'T work. That'll show them Libs!

Manic! 10-16-2020 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002812)
As I recall, while our government was dead set on not "stigmatizing the virus" the US had shut down incoming flights from China, and then Europe. Our government placed no such restrictions on incoming flights.
What measures did our federal government take that the US didn't and should have?

Making sure we don't have 90k people at a football game or have 200k at a biker rally.

welfare 10-16-2020 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CivicBlues (Post 9002822)
Ah yes, let's compare things that our governments did that DIDN'T work. That'll show them Libs!

How do you know it didn't work?

sonick 10-16-2020 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002812)
As I recall, while our government was dead set on not "stigmatizing the virus" the US had shut down incoming flights from China, and then Europe. Our government placed no such restrictions on incoming flights.
What measures did our federal government take that the US didn't and should have?

I don't have the data on exact federal measures, but to your point, I feel what you mentioned about stigmatizing the virus, played a large part the approach each country has taken to the virus and the resulting outcomes we are seeing now.

Trump and the Republican's messages made everything around the coronavirus a partisan issue, stigamtizing masks, social distancing, or even the belief that coronavirus exists.

Being Republican meant you do not wear masks, it meant you made it a point to not socially distance, it meant you operated as if it didn't exist. And if you did any of those things, as a republican you'd be stigmatized and called out for it, shunned from the 'ingroup'. I feel that in itself accounts for a large part of the outcome we see today, not even considering any active federal measures.

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002813)
I think the issue here is the clear double standard.
They had no problem allowing the New York Times to display a story based on possibly illegally obtained tax returns just a couple weeks ago, as just one example.

The issue is not about how it was acquired, it's about the legitimacy of the materials that were stolen. The NYT story was fact checked and had evidence that the tax returns were likely authentic.

This NYP Hunter Biden story has clear questions around the legitimacy of the emails that were stolen.

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002816)
That's still more than our government did

But Canada is doing better now in terms of Coronavirus cases by population and in job recovery. So maybe that's a good thing ?

CivicBlues 10-16-2020 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002825)
How do you know it didn't work?

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

welfare 10-16-2020 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manic! (Post 9002823)
Making sure we don't have 90k people at a football game or have 200k at a biker rally.

Was that a federal policy here?

welfare 10-16-2020 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CivicBlues (Post 9002827)

How do you know it wouldn't be much worse without the flight restrictions?
Did Canada's border restrictions not work either?

68style 10-16-2020 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002816)
That's still more than our government did

We did exactly the same thing. Only citizens and perm res allowed in.

We also did immeasurably better contact tracing and shut down and response... Trudeau wasn't standing there going "Masks don't work, just don't be weaksauce ok... or old... like... be free and stuff masks = communism and rights taken away!!!"

USA is fucked anyway tho, private hospitals, no data sharing between any of them... their whole system crumbles under these circumstances between stubborn and obtuse behaviour and a system where everyone is competing and pitted against each other for $... donezo...

welfare 10-16-2020 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonick (Post 9002826)
I don't have the data on exact federal measures, but to your point, I feel what you mentioned about stigmatizing the virus, played a large part the approach each country has taken to the virus and the resulting outcomes we are seeing now.

Trump and the Republican's messages made everything around the coronavirus a partisan issue, stigamtizing masks, social distancing, or even the belief that coronavirus exists.

Being Republican meant you do not wear masks, it meant you made it a point to not socially distance, it meant you operated as if it didn't exist. And if you did any of those things, as a republican you'd be stigmatized and called out for it, shunned from the 'ingroup'. I feel that in itself accounts for a large part of the outcome we see today, not even considering any active federal measures.



The issue is not about how it was acquired, it's about the legitimacy of the materials that were stolen. The NYT story was fact checked and had evidence that the tax returns were likely authentic.

This NYP Hunter Biden story has clear questions around the legitimacy of the emails that were stolen.

I believe the issue was about displaying "hacked material". That was the excuse

Quote:

Originally Posted by sonick (Post 9002826)
But Canada is doing better now in terms of Coronavirus cases by population and in job recovery. So maybe that's a good thing ?

The us unemployment rate is at 7.9%, Canada's is at 9%.
If you compare gdp growth rate, america is doing considerably better as well.

welfare 10-16-2020 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 68style (Post 9002830)
We did exactly the same thing. Only citizens and perm res allowed in.

We also did immeasurably better contact tracing and shut down and response... Trudeau wasn't standing there going "Masks don't work, just don't be weaksauce ok... or old... like... be free and stuff masks = communism and rights taken away!!!"

USA is fucked anyway tho, private hospitals, no data sharing between any of them... their whole system crumbles under these circumstances between stubborn and obtuse behaviour and a system where everyone is competing and pitted against each other for $... donezo...

Fair enough.
I just think much more blame is deserved of the governor's of individual states, rather than the federal response. They don't seem to be getting any publicity for their failings. And there have been plenty.

mikemhg 10-16-2020 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002813)
I think the issue here is the clear double standard.
They had no problem allowing the New York Times to display a story based on possibly illegally obtained tax returns just a couple weeks ago, as just one example.

It's not illegal, first amendment protects The Times from posting such information, the public have every right to such information during a campaign.

https://lawandcrime.com/legal-analys...s-tax-returns/

“First Amendment law could hardly be clearer than that the press is protected in publishing newsworthy information, let alone information about a President in the midst of his campaign for re-election, regardless of whether its source was authorized or permitted to provide it,” Abrams said. “In any event, no law barred the Times from publishing its article and if there had been one it would in all likelihood be unconstitutional.”

I thought you guys love the first amendment :lol

Manic! 10-16-2020 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002828)
Was that a federal policy here?

You only need a federal policy when there is a problem. We in Canada did not have a problem. If we did I am sure the goverment would have put the proper bans in place.

underscore 10-16-2020 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002833)
Fair enough.
I just think much more blame is deserved of the governor's of individual states, rather than the federal response. They don't seem to be getting any publicity for their failings. And there have been plenty.

That seems to be a more general flaw in how the US works. The President and the national gov't only have so much power over the individual states but people seem to think the President has direct input and control over everything that happens, so all Presidents get credit and blame for things they had absolutely nothing to do with.

It's not exactly surprising given how the US loves to deal in absolutes, but it's a bit annoying to sort through. Though it's not like there's anything I can actually do with the information anyways.

CivicBlues 10-16-2020 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002829)
How do you know it wouldn't be much worse without the flight restrictions?
Did Canada's border restrictions not work either?

We can't, but if you compare results for Canada vs. the US you'll see it was a non-issue at best and negligible at worst.

welfare 10-16-2020 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by underscore (Post 9002836)
That seems to be a more general flaw in how the US works. The President and the national gov't only have so much power over the individual states but people seem to think the President has direct input and control over everything that happens, so all Presidents get credit and blame for things they had absolutely nothing to do with.

It's not exactly surprising given how the US loves to deal in absolutes, but it's a bit annoying to sort through. Though it's not like there's anything I can actually do with the information anyways.

I don't consider it a flaw.
Our Canadian federalist government was founded on the same principals.
It's important that provincial and municipal governments remain autonomous.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CivicBlues (Post 9002839)
We can't, but if you compare results for Canada vs. the US you'll see it was a non-issue at best and negligible at worst.

Taiwan also restricted flights early. 7 deaths total. Was it negligible for them as well?

whitev70r 10-16-2020 02:30 PM


Well, Savanna, that is debatable whether he is someone's crazy uncle ...

68style 10-16-2020 02:34 PM

^
Trumpy didn't disagree with her.... cuz actually he IS someone's crazy uncle.


Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002848)
Taiwan also restricted flights early. 7 deaths total. Was it negligible for them as well?

Richmond was also crazy low in cases compared to everywhere else... why? Cuz Asian people are keen to wear masks / it’s engrained in their culture already from pollution avoidance (2 stroke scooters are awful) and previous virus problems.

underscore 10-16-2020 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002848)
I don't consider it a flaw.
Our Canadian federalist government was founded on the same principals.
It's important that provincial and municipal governments remain autonomous

The separation may not be a flaw, but so many people thinking the responsibility for things lies in the hands of people who have nothing to do with them while simultaneously ignoring those who are actually responsible is absolutely flawed.

CivicBlues 10-16-2020 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by welfare (Post 9002848)
Taiwan also restricted flights early. 7 deaths total. Was it negligible for them as well?

Taiwan also had test and trace, mandatory quarantine, masking, and a healthy respect for the virus since day 0. It also did not restrict flights early. I know this because my dad connected through TPE in April.

I don't know what you're trying to get at here. You've picked an odd hill to die on.

SkinnyPupp 10-16-2020 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Bastardo (Post 9002785)
https://i.imgur.com/uBSDlH9.jpg


Literally retweeting/responding to fake news on a fake news website.

Thank you Donald, very cool.


StylinRed 10-16-2020 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by underscore (Post 9002818)
The cult is hopeless when it comes to stuff like this. If it's something they want to believe then:

Not censored = it's true because they aren't denying it
Censored = it's true because they're covering it up

But if it's something they don't want to believe then:

Not censored = fake news
Censored = proof everything that isn't censored is also incorrect

They'll never change their minds because they have to believe they're smarter than everyone else at all costs and are impossible to reason with, so the best option is to not waste time on them (I've given up on several that I know) and focus on some level of maintaining accurate information for normal people.

That's absolutely true, it's also true that Biden supporters are doing the exact same thing, they immediately deny/doubt the Biden leaks, and won't even give it attention, it's a scary situation when both sides feel like they're 100% in the right, and just turn on the blinders when potential doubt in their belief appears

Again, America is so fucked n scary atm, I'm glad our borders are going to remain closed for awhile longer, cuz it looks like it may get even crazier down there soon


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net