| Eff-1 | 08-18-2025 03:09 PM | Going back to this air canada thing, here's my take.
Airline industry from the beginning always paid based on block time. Is it time to change/update that? I kinda think so. As soon as you arrive at the airport and clock in, you should be paid. Sounds reasonable to me to update and modernize the whole system of how FAs are paid.
But when it comes to "poverty wages" for junior FAs, sure I agree those rates should be increased for inflation. But what the union doesn't tell you is you start as a junior and work your way up the ranks, then life is pretty sweet. Quote:
A flight attendants schedule is usually between 75-90 hours a month with 10 guaranteed days off. You also have grey days, but you do not have to pick up the phone if you don't want to fly. You will have to pick up on reserve days. I fly twice a week, at $60 an hour (I do have some seniority). I can easily get another job. I can pick up flights or drop flights. It is incredibly flexible. If I want to go overseas I make per diem. If I am away for 3-4 days I make an extra $4.50 per hour/24 hours a day until I arrive back home. I get great flight benefits and when on layovers I stay in 5 Star hotels. A lot of flight attendants make more than a first officer. It has always been like this, you get paid for flight time only and maybe it is time for a change. What I don't like is this portrayal of a poverty wage. You do not have to be available 24/7. Many flight attendants have other careers, I know nurses and actors and chiropractors that fly...
| My buddy's wife is a senior Air Canada FA. She runs her own retail business but also then flies 2 shifts a month overseas, makes $60+ an hour, gets per diem, and then travels the world with her family in business class thanks to employee fares.
If the union wants juniors to be paid more, why not consider more equality from juniors to senior? OH wait, that's not how unions roll. The seniors "paid their dues" and got their nut so the younger ones have to do the same right?
-EDIT forgot to mention, government should stop legislating people back to work. the right to strike is guaranteed in the charter. what's the point of the charter if the gov't can make rules that allow them to ignore it?? I like the fact the union is defying the order. it stands for something bigger IMO. |