![]() | |
^ Did you go to Shanghai yet? |
Yup, I'm actually back home now. |
Souzhou and Shanghai got all the hotties! :) |
|
|
^ 24-70? :) |
yep :) |
I tried that lens. Didn't really like the fact that it didn't have IS. How do you like it? |
With the current FF cameras, you can boost the ISO to compensate for the lack of IS/VR without too much of a noise penalty. The 24-70 lenses from canon/Nikon/Sony are amazing optics. The canon/Nikon lenses have really smooth bokeh, but the Sony/Zeiss lens is a bit sharper, as it looks like Zeiss sacrificed a tiny bit of bokeh smoothness for ultimate sharpness. Of course, if you want a FF camera with IS/VR, the Sony A900 + the Sony/Zeiss 24-70 is currently the only way. |
|
Quote:
The Sigma wasn't a bad lens though, the Canon is just much better. However, it does cost like 3 times more. I wonder how the Sigma 24-70 HSM performs though... Oh, and about what Senna said, on all these new FF cameras with ridiculously low noise and high ISO, IS is not really needed anymore. I do fine without IS on both my 24-70L and my 200L with my 20D. But then again, I am shooting outside the majority of the time. |
^^^ You just have to remember to adjust the ISO. Something I always forget to do when I'm using a D700 or 5DmkII. |
Yeah ISO is the first thing i check on my camera now before i shoot. I was shooting at 1600 ISO outdoors one time... caught on pretty quickly though because I noticed i was shooting at 1/8000th of a second at f8 or something |
heh when I first got a dslr, I was shooting at 1600 ISO during the day at granville island and couldn't figure out why everything was so grainy. Turns out the nite before my friend was playing around with the settings and set it to 1600. |
|
Quote:
Hmm... you know, it also begs for a caption... http://www2.moltenimage.com/photos/r.../towtrucks.jpg |
gfunk, explanation for the 2nd picture please? |
^^ I know, I know... I posted the photo because of the content, not technical quality. I was shooting into the Sun, so the image is actually quite underexposed. I had to work some Lightroom magic to get detail back. I didn't care about perspective control or rotation. ...that's my story, and I'm stickin' to it! :p |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2570/...7dd6410780.jpg I just wanted to post a photo of my cat, RAWR! |
davidhtam, does yours focus bang on? I found my old 24-70 back focused. No longer have it. |
Just got back from fishing at Furry Creek. LMK what you guys think http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3418/...4a3aae8328.jpg http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3515/...f684c85c14.jpg http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2500/...422e16a24c.jpg |
I hope you didn't get hit by errant golf balls. Haha.. Too bad you didn't have a polarizer for the sea star shot. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:09 PM. | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net