![]() |
these pics are NICE i have a dedicated macro lens (tamron 90mm) but don't have the time to dedicate to taking macro pics.. feel like im wasting the lens.. its a hardache to take macro b/c most of the time you would probably need a tripod in order to take shots in less than ideal lighting... imo |
Quote:
is the tamrom 90mm an expensive lens? |
tamron 90mm goes for 450-500 usually. uses a screw drive motor for AF. if you wait until jan, prices will go up to 500-550 due to a new version with internal motor. most macro lenses go for 400-600 dollars for tamron, sigma, and tokina. all are good. extension tubes allow for a magnification greater than 1x. however, you usually lose AF unless you buy kenko extension tubes (quite expensive) |
http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/3328/img0033dr0.jpg first shot with canon rebel xs tweaking settings is more tricky than i thought =p |
Quote:
is that some home made spicy pho?? I wish I had some home made pho... |
Tamron macro lens is quite good for very cheap. You can find one of craigslist for around $250 or so. Its a good lens too, gets the job done nicely. I have a friend with one. |
|
These were taken not to long ago at Seymour during a snow shoeing trek. I didn't have a macro, so I improvised with my Canon 17-40 F4. Now please be easy, these were taken without a tripod, held by hand with no reverse ring. You can see where in the second image the light was able to splash in through the top. http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3371/...9ecd0b96_o.jpg http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3522/...200a8a22_o.jpg http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3320/...34318b31_o.jpg http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3387/...8716ce3a_o.jpg |
Sweet macro's Mananetwork! Nice work with that lens! Here's one i took a few days ago. Starting to warm up a bit, but nothing much to shoot still. http://i39.tinypic.com/2463yh2.jpg Straight ugly! Cool eyes tho! |
Quote:
|
|
Cool shot. What lens do you use for your shots? Have you tried increasing the f-stop and using an external flash so you can get the whole ant in focus? Not that this picture is wrong or anything :) |
My setup is 40D + MPE-65mm + MR-14EX flash @ F10. This shot is about 3.5 - 4X life size, with a bit of a crop. So with the MPE you are your aperture x magnification = actual aperture. So around F40. To get the whole ant in focus you would need to focus stack. Then you would need a stationary object, of which ants aren't. In other words, its tough. |
^^ ah, nice setup. The MPE-65 is all manual focus isn't it? I have a similar set up, well, sort of. I have a 40D as well + 100mm macro + I use my 580ex for flash, which works pretty well for most of my shots :) Keep posting. Pics look awesome! :) |
Thanks! Yeah its alot of fun to use forsure! Sometimes not so fun tho, because it is full manual. It doesn't tell you when you have anything in focus so its totally your eyes. The DOF in so thin its crazy sometimes! I haven't used every Canon lens out there, but i would imagine the MPE would be the toughest lens in the lineup. |
Quote:
|
|
^^^ The hands are in the wrong position, and your DoF is cutting right through the brand name. As a product shot, a big no-no. :) |
Quote:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3547/...6ca2ae77_b.jpg |
Cool picture niforpix! I would say that i'm around 1 inch or so away from my subject when your getting into 4-5x magnification. DOF is soo thin its ridiculous! |
|
Good pictures! With the first picture it would have been nice to see the eyes of your subject. The eyes always tell the story. Thats what i usually go for with macro shots. Here's a recent one.. http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3612/...12f2b5e5_b.jpg 40D + mpe @F10 @2.5 or so lifesize + ringflash... And for my next trick (straight out of camera of course, no PP) http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3643/...2f77b9f2_b.jpg |
|
|
Nice shot Jason! Was that at Reifel? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net