You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Computer Tech, Gaming & ElectronicsTHIS SPACE OPEN FOR ADVERTISEMENT. YOU SHOULD BE ADVERTISING HERE! Silicon Valley.
Tips & tricks, tech support, home theatre, online gaming, reviews, latest news...
That should be sufficient, yes... although I've seen with a lot of routers (not just D-Links) where the DHCP client list doesn't update immediately, so there are sometimes machines connected that don't show right away. However, there should also be a page that will list the wireless clients connected (DHCP table lists hardwire-connected machines as well).
There should also be a page where you can specify only listed MAC addresses that are allowed to connect... turn that feature on and put your machines in the list and that should help prevent unauthorized connections as well.
Ultimately, no router can be made 100% secure, but with a combination of steps, you can minimize the chances.
Advertisement
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
safest way, is limit the amount of IP address that can be issued.
In my household theres only 2 laptops, iphone, and ps3 that would need to connect to my net, thus i only issue ip address from 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.1.5
and if a friend wants to connect onto my network, i simply turn off one of my connected devices or just change it from 1.5 to 1.6
Are you able to limit how much bandwidth/speed a computer can get from the connection ? I have a linksys WRT54G v5 which isn't supported by tomato, any other recommendations on custom firmware ?
safest way, is limit the amount of IP address that can be issued.
In my household theres only 2 laptops, iphone, and ps3 that would need to connect to my net, thus i only issue ip address from 192.168.1.2 to 192.168.1.5
and if a friend wants to connect onto my network, i simply turn off one of my connected devices or just change it from 1.5 to 1.6
"Safest"? Hardly. That adds only the faintest bit of security, because it doesn't limit the IPs that can connect, only the ones that are issued by the DHCP server. I could manually set my IP to 192.168.1.anything-from-2-to-253 and connect to your network, unless you're actually filtering IPs. And even at that, I could set my IP to one within your range, and knock one of your machines off the network.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godzira
Does anyone know how many to a signature?
..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brianrietta
Not a sebberry post goes by where I don't frown and think to myself "so..?"
Are you able to limit how much bandwidth/speed a computer can get from the connection ? I have a linksys WRT54G v5 which isn't supported by tomato, any other recommendations on custom firmware ?
Only DD-WRT SE (the paid version) supports individual MAC address bandwidth limit. The regular one supports a pooled bandwidth limit between all users. Posted via RS Mobile
my PM didnt reply me personally, but the office told me this:
Quote:
Thank you for your e-mail. Parliament does not accept or reject these types of applications - the authority is delegated from Parilament to the CRTC via the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Act, the Broadcasting Act, and the Telecommunications Act. As such, I highly encourage you to give your opinions on the matter to the commission as that is the proper venue to voice your statement of concern.
We do want to thank you for contacting our office, and hope things are more clear and that you have a better understanding as well, that Parliament does not have any jurisdiction in the this matter and therefore we can only assist you by pointing you in the right direction. By contacting the people who have the power to affect these decisions and make these changes, hopefully you and others will get some redress for your grievance.
Im not sure how much data i use per month but i play COD, stream tv shows which are 300-500mb each per episode, and download movies at times. So i guess ill be expecting a letter and i guess ill be calling up TELUS to install their service.
Shaw is just being greedy, no way their infrastructure is being worked. They just want to bank off streaming video to make up for the losses in TV. Its very unfair and anyone who supports this, I WILL FIGHT YOU!
Instead of being lazy about it, send a real letter (snail mail) to your MP, and send one to the head of the CRTC too. Continue to send them and make sure that your friends send them too (postage is free.)
Telus is advertising "unlimited usage" as unlimited hours on the internet which is just plain stupid. I'll post the link when I get home but it's right in their FAQ.