![]() |
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/Sha...280/story.html Sorry if repost: The more than 3,000 words posted online were called an apology and it seemed a remarkable display of contrition by a young woman caught on video looting a tuxedo rental outlet, wearing a Canucks shirt and a broad grin, during Vancouver's ignoble Stanley Cup riot. But the screed that followed dished as much justification and vitriol as self-flagellation and regret, leaving many readers cold to Camille Cacnio's reconciliation. It is seen as the next stage in an emerging form of "electronic justice" that has accompanied the riot. The naming and shaming came first, a time-honoured way for a community to express dismay and disgust, as people posted photos of suspected perpetrators online. It was a modern version of the medieval stocks, when an offender was held in a square for public humiliation. It seemed a suitable response: a mob exposing participants in a mob; crowdsourcing v. herd mentality. But the extent and viciousness of the online identifications and humiliation is causing discomfort as well. Self-appointed cyber sheriffs emailed the employers, family, schools of the suspects. Now come the public apologies, as some take to the Internet to express regret, a sort of e-restorative justice. Only this misses a crucial component, warned Rob Gordon, professor of criminology at Simon Fraser University. "In restorative justice, you've got to face-up, 'fess-up, apologize and then move on, but this online stuff is going to last a long, long time. And it is being done anonymously," he said. The people aren't facing the owners of the store they victimized; they are facing an online mob. "This isn't restorative justice -this is no forgiveness." Christopher Schneider, sociology professor at the University of British Columbia, calls it "vigilante justice in cyberspace.... It is a very dangerous path we're taking. It is quite unsettling. The role of social media in this is profound." The sting of public exposure is on display in Ms. Cacnio's lengthy statement. Instead of keeping to a script of regret, more words were spent attacking her critics and justifying her action. She seems to have had second thoughts. She has removed her original and replaced it with 400 words of contrition. But as with most things online, words can be hard to retract. ahumphreys@nationalpost.com |
Quote:
Keep helping vpd find these guys!!! :D :D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I believe that's how it works.... some HR pro correct me if i'm wrong. |
Quote:
|
Shouldn't any decent contract mention something about: "the employee shal conduct him/herself with professionalism and maintain an image of upstanding citizenship and morality that is in-line with the organization both in an out of the workplace." So pretty much as long as you screw up bad enough that it could look bad on your employer, you're turfed. |
Quote:
that mostly applys to when your on the job and not in your own free time but im sure an employer who wants to fire some one because they were in the riot could find and excuse to fire them pretty easily |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/britis...t.html?ref=rss Blenz is suing all the rioters identified attacking their store. Good on Blenz, set an example of these idiots! |
Quote:
|
I imagine that civil litigation will be a huge headache (lawyers, time, cost) for those named in the Blenz example. Hopefully other businesses follow suit. |
I was watching the news today before work and they had the BLENZ president on and he said that they don't care about money going to the company they only want to see their franchisee owners get money back. He also said that they want an apology first and then money as that is the only way people will learn. He wants to get an apology for the three people locked in a storage room for one of the blenz as one of the girls is still in shock from what happened. He also mentioned that they have so much video footage from inside the store that they would have to be idiots not turn themselves in before they come after them |
First I dont feel sorry for anyone that was in the riot and who has been named. I am just surprised Tim Kwong has escaped the wrath. He is the one that lit the turned over truck on fire by the post office. |
Quote:
|
Lots of people are complaining now how they are being unjustly sought after by the "social media mob." I just find it funny how you do something so retarded.. (Waterpolo guy, Asian chick with big smile, Tim) and think that it's unfair that they're getting punished now. Sure it might be getting abit out of hand, but atleast this will teach them if they don't get prosecuted. Think first. =] |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The rioters that were employees were actually committing crimes, therefore their employers have every right to let their staff go. The real sticky situation is the employers who fired their staff over just posting their views on the riot rather than actively participating in it. |
^ there are other precedents where employees have been fired for bad mouthing their bosses on facebook. i'm not sure if that has happened here in canada though. to answer your question, the lawyers are doing it because it's their job to spin shit in the opposite direction no matter how stupid or wrong it seems. |
finally got my sound to work |
fuckin idiots |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Not sure if this has been posted yet, following this thread has been a challenge http://riot2011frontlines.tumblr.com...cers-letter-to Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via RS Mobile |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net