Dr. Bonnie's announcement about immunization plan.

Pfizer approved as vaccine for people 16 years or older be Moderna vaccine is undergoing review.

Dr. Bonnie announced that Pfizer and Moderna vaccine's efficacy rate, effective against Covid, is 94 to 95 percent. Test trials were done on people of all ages and ethnic backgrounds.

-Health Canada announcement:

“This is a critical milestone in our fight against COVID-19 and in our efforts to provide every Canadian with access to a vaccine. Canadians can have confidence in our rigorous review process and that the vaccine was only authorized after a thorough assessment,” says Dr. Supriya Sharma, chief medical advisor at Health Canada.

The approval comes with terms and conditions. The vaccine is only approved for use in people 16 years and older, officials say, adding they are still awaiting results for further clinical trials on children before approving its use for younger people.


I trust Health Canada's vaccine review process. very very stringent standards need to be met by a vaccine before Health Canada approves any new faccine. . rigorous review process for all vaccines in Canada.
-7 to 12 employees at Health Canada work over 2000 hours to review any new vaccine.


Dr. Bonnie is stressing the importance to continue following provincial health orders, maintaining social distancing, and wear masking given the initial amounts of vaccine to B.C, to Canada, is small.

She mentions that there is enough vaccine for about 380 thousand people by end of March in B.C. to protect front line health care workers, and the most vulnerable groups in our population. That group would include seniors living in care homes.

An Immunizations BC Operations Centre is set up as part of the immunization plan. BC CDC employees are part of this operations centre.

Person gets Vaccine

Person is hit by a bus

OmG We NeEd MoRe DaTa!!!!

OMG I think about that ALL THE TIME for some reason EleGiggle

Like not literally all the time, but that memory randomly comes up for me, as recently as a few weeks ago.

even with a timestamp?

https://youtu.be/mNaMR8AyeWc?list=PL...b-mIpNA5d&t=80

619 new cases n 16 dead in the last day... Why does it seem like the new cases and deaths are harder to find now the headlines are all about other topics

You're adding a list to it as well

When posting youtube, include the timestamp expression only (?t=80) and delete the playlist link

Burying the actual numbers so people don't think its ok to get together for Xmas?

Good to see it’s somewhat steady the last few days

But it still seems like a lot of people dying though. Over 100 a week. That must mean they are making lots of room in the senior homes.

^^ my grandmother (70, healthy, lives alone) has had 3 different old age homes ‘cold call’ her in the last two weeks. No idea how they have her number and she told them to stuff it

wtf.. that's pretty gross

So if it's unproven whether the vaccine stops or even inhibits transmission, what reason would there be to restrict those who haven't had it administered?

Death?

Can you be more specific?
Death from who?
The people who've taken the vaccine and are still transmitting the virus?
Or the people who haven't taken the vaccine and are still transmitting the virus?

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55244122

It came after two NHS workers had allergic reactions on Tuesday.

The advice applies to those who have had reactions to medicines, food or vaccines, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency said.

The two people had a reaction shortly after having the new jab, had treatment and are both fine now.

They are understood to have had an anaphylactoid reaction, which tends to involve a skin rash, breathlessness and sometimes a drop in blood pressure. This is not the same as anaphylaxis which can be fatal.

Both NHS workers have a history of serious allergies and carry adrenaline pens around with them.



Will I be damn.

Valuable perspective again.
Admittedly, we don't know the long term effects, but we don't really have the 10 years to figure it out.

I ment that her side effects were worse than the majority of people who have had covid. She had a fever of 40.5. A fever above 39.5 is dangerous and above 40 can be life threatening.

Who?

And why is he wearing a stupid white jacket with his name on it? EleGiggle

The FDA states ivermectin inhibits covid 19 replication, but they say further study is needed

https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...66354220302011

https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinar...tended-animals

It's a drug used to treat parasite infections etc (lice etc) and also in animals to prevent diseases

Doctors often testify/give talks with their scrubs/coats on /shrug

"You better listen to me, I am wearing a white coat with my name on it" EleGiggle

Really though, it's good that we have another prophylactic candidate after hydroxychloroquine failed so bad. It's weird that it's being touted so hard by weird/fringe right wingers though (the type of people who are prone to Appeal of Authority figures wearing white coats with their name on it) (and oh they also pushed hydroxycloroquine hard for some reason as well)...

Just keep studying it (which they're doing). If it works and it's safe, we'll absolutely use it.

Yeah, that's not the same as a reaction worse than getting COVID itself. Who is to say she wouldn't have been hospitalized with the real thing? That the immune response wouldn't have been similar? You can't infer one person's experience with a vaccine and compare it to a loosely defined demographic that gets the real thing.

Dr Kory is the president of FLCCC. A large and growing group of nearly 100 physicians who work with covid patients in critical care. Himself having thousands of hours experience dealing with critically ill covid patients personally.
As mentioned the group has over 2000 peer reviewed publications.
I think he's qualified enough for his opinion to be taken seriously.

These doctors encourage the repurposing of treatments that have been in circulation for decades because the side effects are well known and documented. Of course the patents have expired on them years ago, so they're not as marketable as a drug like remdesevir, which Fauci and the media had lauded as practically groundbreaking with far less significant results.