![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don’t personally agree with that law (along with several other draconian DUI laws; BC having some of the strictest, most draconian laws in North America), but I don’t blame the officer if he was enforcing the law. It’s up to law makers to institute laws that make sense for society as a whole. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You want the cops to let go of a man who's been drinking and driving, and give him a ride home? |
No, not sarcasm. He was drunk, PARKED in a Wendy's lot. Situation was under control for a good 30 -40 mins. Leave the car in the lot, give the guy a ride home (or his sister''s), give the guy a break, hope he learns his lesson, you've settled the situation. You go home to your family, he goes home, you're not charged for murder. In this climate, a white cop giving a black man a break would have turned out 1000x better than how they actually went about it. |
From what I read, he was literally passed out in the drive-thru lane. So he drove there wasted and was clearly still attempting to drive. How is that any different from getting caught driving through a Granville bridge road block drunk? Do you expect the VPD there to ask you nicely to step out so they can chauffeur you home and tuck you in? |
Quote:
Meanwhile I got suspended for my N sign falling over, 1 week after they were introduced LUL (and also accused of being high, because I was in a good mood) |
For those of you who are familiar with the story Les Miserables? Who is the hero of the story? Javert, law and order police? The priest who gave Jean Valjean a break and the candlesticks to make a better life? Or, Jean Valjean, who turned his life around because of that one act of kindness? |
Quote:
I appreciate your posts though, you clearly have a deep background on this subject, and you've taken the time to post very clear concise points and arguments. As Skinny had said earlier, we all have busy lives, and you've taken the time to have a respectful discussion, along with providing non-anecdotal facts. Much respect to you, and I'm glad we have people like you working in the DTES. |
I'm really conflicted about the shooting in Atlanta. On one hand, I find it quite telling that the other officer is testifying against the officer that opened fire. That takes a high level of intestinal fortitude, as I have no doubt that officer will be ostracized for taking that stance. Something must've been fishy if that officer is willing to put his job on the line to testify against his partner. One has to wonder as well, if the man was white, would that officer have been more lenient? How often do we see white kids that commit petty crimes, and get a mere slap on the hand, meanwhile when we see a black kid commit the same crime, he's charged as an adult, and slapped with a life ending felony? We watched a documentary last night on that very subject, in fact. In my opinion, you should never try and fight the police when getting arrested, that in itself is a death sentence. Why is the guy even being arrested? I've seen many friends get a DUI and go home in a cab right from the scene, the guy wasn't driving, suspend his license, tow the car, and call it a day. Him fighting the cop, and running away with a taser was his death sentence, and that's why I'm conflicted on that one. At the end of the day though, he was running away, not running at the officer. So why open fire? Is that REALLY necessary? It's the same way the police here in Canada will not chase a fleeing vehicle, it's dangerous and puts others at risk, it's far easier to simply show up at the guy's house when it's all said and done. Why not let the guy piss off, you have all his information, pick him up later that night for fleeing arrest. To open fire and kill him as your first option, meanwhile you have another officer with you as backup? It doesn't make sense. I realize cops are humans too, but if you join that particular line of work, you are held to a higher standard. When a doctor botches a surgery, do we simply say "Oh well, he's only human". Of course not, doctors are held at an extremely high standard where there is very little room for mistakes. Why aren't police held to that same standard? Either way, here we are arguing about this one, where in the same state Ahmaud Arbery was shot dead in cold blood simply for jogging in broad daylight by an ex-police officer/investigator, with two district attorneys, and a judge who tried to cover it up. We've seen hangings over the last few weeks that have initially been concluded as suicides, with the families pushing for further investigations. As a black man, who the hell hangs themselves from a tree nowadays, no chair, or anything? It seems very odd, given the history in the US. In New York, some people are putting up hanging nooses from trees. https://www.latimes.com/california/s...-black-brother https://www.ajc.com/news/people-colo...vRYn4Zqw0f1gL/ Stinks like a cover up to me, and I don't blame them, if it comes out that these men were killed in modern-day lynchings, there will be absolute hell to pay. All of these issues are so obviously apparent here that the arguments in this thread seem all too ridiculous. |
Quote:
Canada's numbers are about the same when adjusting for population. If doctors operated at the same level of standard as police, we'd be lucky. |
Quote:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/n...r68_06-508.pdf |
|
Quote:
https://bc.ctvnews.ca/shocking-video...tism-1.4990904 The Cheemas received negative reviews of their business on social media, and Riddoch posted the surveillance video on Saturday. Karn Cheema posted his father’s cellphone video in response. That has been shared at least 300,000 times on various platforms. And the backlash involved threats to Riddoch’s father’s business, vandalism, and “explicit threats to violently attack, sexually assault and murder myself and my family,” Riddoch posted. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
With regard to Rayshard Brooks, he was drunk, and parked blocking the drive thru, really he should've just been thrown in the drunk tank for the night, or in an extremely ideal world, taken home to sleep it off. The former is what was going to happen, but he wasn't just running away with a stolen police weapon, he pointed it at police, and supposedly fired it too, that prompts an instantaneous reaction, thanks to training, the officer has no time to reason out the possibilities. I don't believe the charges will stick, I think the only reason he was even charged is due to the current climate, because the video evidence itself exonerated the officer. And for the Surrey incident, I'm shocked he'd dare to be so grossly racist against South Asians there, you know he's only sorry because that video was uploaded. |
Quote:
|
CTV bleeps swears in video then types them out uncensored in the story. :fulloffuck: |
Yup, the privilege is palpable. Trying to shame the business and not handling it like adults...POS and only sorry they're caught. |
are these the people we banging our pots for at 7pm? FailFish Quote:
less off topic, uncle ben's also changing up their branding Quote:
interestingly in asian circles, uncle/aunty is what you call friends and acquaintances your parents age out of respect in b4 justice bao is unacceptable Spoiler! |
Quote:
|
if you saw the fb posts on the topic, his family chimed in and supported his behavior. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net