EvoFire | 06-03-2025 11:07 AM | Quote:
Originally Posted by 6793026
(Post 9179776)
There was an article in Van Sun - developer paying city back for not being able to build social housing... so good luck with that.
65 cents 2 bedroom 700sq for $500 is not bad.
You have to build contingency .. so I sucked it up before.
Now if you have a pool + gym + basketball court / golf stimulation machine + concierge well that's what's you / owners are paying for.
Can't complain on that. You get what you pay for.
If you don't use it.. well then that's ur problem.
You think you have it bad? You know the burrard location? Sen̓áḵw band is building 4 stories and because they are 1st nations, they don't have to abide to nothing. I was told there are limited parking spaces (to be confirmed) - as in 3 units to 1 spot.. HOLY F. | I don't remember if River district had amenities. I was under the assumption that they don't.
When you say Burrard do you mean Burrard on Van West side or Burrard in DT? If you are in the middle of DT it's not terrible to not have a car. Burrard west side Vancouver is pretty abysmal for transportation though until the subway opens. Quote:
Originally Posted by supafamous
(Post 9179786)
I generally hate the idea that the River District exists for all the reasons stated - super car centric, no transit, no schools, lack of parking, out of the way etc but I will admit that the core of it has turned out pretty decent. It's got a solid offering of restaurants, a Save-On, a great liquor store, Shoppers etc and it's quite walkable (could use more tree cover though) and does have decent views.
If they ever add a proper bus line (the 30 and 80 are kinda useless) through there and get a school in place I think it'll actually turn out to be a decent neighbourhood.
FWIW, the Joyce/Collingwood area has turned out to be a pretty good neighbourhood minus the lack of street level retail along Vaness. Nice big park space in the middle, decent amenities, and great transit. Everything up to Kingsway should have been rezoned though to allow for at least low rises. | I go to River District as it's the closest TD branch to me. The plaza is busy when the weather is good, lots of little kids running around on the weekend. It's a nice secluded area but the fact that it's at the bottom of a big hill is a killer. Cars are mandatory, and the parents I talk to who are my son's classmates, they are all like yeah need to drive. At Champlain Heights, half the kids are from River District, and almost everyone gets driven to school because it's too far for a 5 year old to walk even if you take away the steep hill from Marine to 49th.
The alternative is getting an ebike. But that brings it's own challenges as you'll need to still find a place to park it and charge it. Some people are up for riding through all weather, most aren't. Quote:
Originally Posted by carsncars
(Post 9179788)
Schools are one (of several) reasons we started looking in North Burnaby/Willingdon Heights but then ended up in Marpole. Alpha Secondary/Burnaby North are already over capacity and there does not appear to be any sort of plan to increase capacity, despite the huge increases in density in the area. I'm sure Churchill will face the same with the Marine Gateway and Oakridge density but to a lesser extent as Vancouver has more numerous secondary schools to spread the load.
Other reasons we decided against North Burnaby: you get the suburb style need to drive everywhere but still have a Vancouver style lot/house, relatively poorer transit once you're away from the Skytrain line, and the SFH values were only slightly more affordable than e.g. Marpole. | I thought Marpole was around the 3 million+ mark, whereas North Burnaby is around 2-2.5m. 500k is a lot of monies man, I can go buy a GT3 and still have monies leftover.
Is South Cambie part of Marpole? I temporarily lived with my parents around the Winona Park area while my house was being rennovated and I did not like the demographics there.
Though I didn't know Alpha/North are over capacity. North JUST got a new building too. |