Quote:
I was actually quite surprised. |
Quote:
people don't realize how little these inconveniences matter when compared to saving literally $3k+ per year on gas (based on 20,000km per year average). |
^ Good luck renting a car when you need it, and extra cost for something that's as comfortable as your own car and not a penalty box. |
Quote:
|
Why not just buy a $5000 beater, winter beater. That's what I do. And you can daily the ev. The gas savings basically pays for both EV and beater. And more convenient than finding a rental. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Before Covid they would go states side almost every week (we have family there too). |
just checked and you can rent a standard sized car tomorrow for $115, and that's not even shopping around at all. if they don't want to then i cant argue that, it's definitely less convenient than jumping in your own car and going. |
Quote:
All this sort of insanity would drive me nuts. On top of tripping my ass over the charging cable inside my garage. Or hiring that prick electrician to bend me over backwards just to install super charger at home. Reminds me of getting quotes for my hot tub. 240v connector , new breaker , new panel , blah blah blah 3k for just the wiring of the damn thing. |
You have a hot tub at home and haven't invited us over for a RS hot tub party? |
:gayfight::gayfight: That’s too much man juice in one tub. |
Quote:
|
^ Do Tesla's stop for bunnies that run in front of them? |
When you’re still having to pay to charge, even $30 a pop, that isn’t much incentive to switch to an EV. Was just with a friend who has the bass model model 3 this past weekend, unless you’re at a supercharger I was very surprised how long the 240V in-home charger takes to charge etc. I know there are cheaper EV’s but if a base model 3 is 50k. It’s 100% the wrong financial move to buy that over a 25,000 civic or Corolla as a “money saving” venture. I understand for the most part it’s not people stretching their budget who were originally looking at a 25,000 vehicle going to a 50,0000 vehicle rather it’s people looking at a 50k vehicle opting for an eV. However it reduces the overall incentive to go full EV if you’re paying to charge all the time |
It only makes sense to start charging electric cars by the kilometer since they use the roads as well so the more you use them the more taxes you pay. I'm sure it's coming it's just a matter of when it becomes popular enough that their gas tax revenue drops. It shouldn't bother EV drivers paying their fair share since they mostly bought it to save the planet. |
Quote:
|
Not sure what you have but even if you have a civic and fill 40l is that even full tank? Will cost you $88 at $2.2 a liter. The same $30 will only get you 13.63l that's like a day or twos worth of driving. :accepted: If you charge at home that $30 in electricity might be two three weeks of daily charging EV. Depending on how much you drive. And it's definitely more than 500 km worth of driving that you get from the $88. |
Now is probably the cheapest time to have an EV. Cheap electricity, and they get to bum off the road network for free. Eventually they'll have to pay for that too. But you have to drive a lot to make it worth it, a PHEV Rav4 is 50% more expensive than a gas one. Even if you could charge for free you don't break even til something like 75,000km. For my wife that'd take 20 years lol. Quote:
|
I think it's only human nature to be protective of what they have or support. And we try to find evidence specifically supporting our argument. But it ultimately comes down to objective measurements. As I have stated earlier, EVs aren't perfect yet. However, the argument of how much electricity costs in the most expensive (both for ICE and EV) area in North America and trying to argue that EV doesn't make too much financial sense it's a stretch by any measurement. At the highest rate, $0.58/kwh, a complete fillup of a Model 3/Y is $43.5, which translates to about 500km in range. For that same 500km, in a normal 10km/L average car is 50L. At today's average price, that's 1.74/L or a tad over $87. Thus. ICE's average operating cost is still more than double of an EV. And that is charging at the most expensive way possible. With at home charging, the cost is 1/3 of ICE. And when we have roughly the same gas price (a tad higher) than LA and far lower electricity rate, the argument on cost is not something one is going to win no matter how much you try. We are talking about roughly 1/8 of operation cost between ICE and EV. It's the same argument trying to compare ICE vs. EV on torque. It's not even on a comparable ground. Let's suppose you are going on a road trip once a year for a week every year. And you don't want to take EV, even at 130/day, or 910/week, it doesn't take long for the potential EV savings to offset that 910 yearly added cost. Heck, if I still have my bimmer, my yearly maintenance cost alone is probably more than that. If you want to argue the convenience of ICE vs. EV on road trips, I will give you that. But for city-wide commuting, there isn't even a close scenario I can imagine ICE coming close to EV. EV gets charged every night while one sleeps. You would never spend another second to fill up in the gas station unless you are buying smoke or shit at convenience store. Mark my words... we will revisit this very post in 5yrs, and the vast majority would not be trying to argue ICE/EV anymore. There are very few advantages of ICE if one narrows it down, and other than personal preference, there would unlikely be any more in 5yr time when EV become more mainstream and charging stations availability is more abundant. |
for me, the phev works out for the wife. her daily commute is about 15km so she is about to get about 3 days of EV range before she has to plug it in. we charge on a regular 120v outlet over night and will get about 50km of ev range. price wise, the prius prime was 41k OTD vs a full EV which at at the time was about 54k + taxes. I don't think i would use up 20k in gas/maintence for the lifetime of the car. usually keep my cars about 10 years before i switch. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
One thing I didn’t really think of that our friend with the model 3 was saying is that the Tesla never learns how it adapts it’s range to hills. He said a few different times he’s monitored the range and basically due to large hills ie. Johnson hill, the snow shed etc. the Tesla will think it can make ir given X range, but it doesn’t anticipate going up a solid climb for half an hour. Given how smart they are i would have thought that would he somthing they would learn or perhaps use the mapping to anticipate but I guess it’s too hard to gauge different different loads, towing, etc. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think at this rate, i should put in some fuel stabilizer in the tank or would it be okay to just leave the gas as is? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net