REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   coronavirus discussion (https://www.revscene.net/forums/716747-coronavirus-discussion.html)

Hondaracer 12-21-2020 02:16 PM

555 cases per day, time to let loose!

Liquid_o2 12-21-2020 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jmac (Post 9011111)
Basically as long as you’re 19+ as of December 18, 2020, a resident of BC, filed your income taxes for 2019, made less than $87500 net income in 2019 ($175000 net for a family), have a valid SIN, have a valid driver’s license or alternative ID, and a bank that accepts direct deposit, you should qualify for at least a partial benefit.

Probably a stupid question - I was on their website and they didn't specify - Does "family" mean myself and my wife? Or do you have to have kids?

westopher 12-21-2020 02:50 PM

You do not need to have kids to be considered a family.

Teriyaki 12-21-2020 03:21 PM

I believe its a wash if declaring as family or not. Family is 2 people ( adults ) for a total of 1000, so each gets 500. Singles declare and receive 500 so it's the same.

Atleast, that's how I'd understand it. 500 for each eligible "voter" persay?

yray 12-21-2020 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teriyaki (Post 9011197)
I believe its a wash if declaring as family or not. Family is 2 people ( adults ) for a total of 1000, so each gets 500. Singles declare and receive 500 so it's the same.

Atleast, that's how I'd understand it. 500 for each eligible "voter" persay?

well if I declared single, I would've got reduced amount versus as family getting total of 1k:okay:

westopher 12-21-2020 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teriyaki (Post 9011197)
I believe its a wash if declaring as family or not. Family is 2 people ( adults ) for a total of 1000, so each gets 500. Singles declare and receive 500 so it's the same.

Atleast, that's how I'd understand it. 500 for each eligible "voter" persay?

If One of you makes 50k and one makes 75k, you will be eligible for the whole 1k as a family as opposed to the 500 and approx $300 you'd get when filing independently.

MG1 12-21-2020 04:34 PM

That's good. My son lives with me and he doesn't make a whole lot right now.

We are family....... I got my son and............. words don't fit, damn it.

Spoiler!

Hondaracer 12-21-2020 04:37 PM

I think even common law couples are considered a “family” under this

whitev70r 12-21-2020 04:58 PM

Every adult in your household can apply. If you are married or common law, then you apply together as a unit.

So your son can apply individually. Anyone who is 19+ can apply. But I don't think you and your son can apply as a 'family'. You and your son would have to apply as individuals ... I think.

SkinnyPupp 12-21-2020 07:24 PM

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard wants to re-introduce a WWII era law that allows them to put a temporary heavy tax on corporations that made larger profits due to the pandemic, and use it to bail out small businesses that suffered due to the pandemic.

Seems like something most normal people would support :considered:

Hondaracer 12-21-2020 08:04 PM

They can’t even pass $600 payments for people, very doubtful that gets through even though it makes perfect sense

If they could tax speculation in private equity they could probably get everyone back on their feet..

CharlesInCharge 12-22-2020 12:04 AM

1997 CNBC Documentary Exposes Link Between Polio Vaccine and Rare Cancer (video doc)
1997 CNBC Documentary Exposes Link Between Polio Vaccine and Rare Cancer ? Old-Thinker News

MG1 12-22-2020 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharlesInCharge (Post 9011247)
1997 CNBC Documentary Exposes Link Between Polio Vaccine and Rare Cancer (video doc)
1997 CNBC Documentary Exposes Link Between Polio Vaccine and Rare Cancer ? Old-Thinker News

Buddy!!! Turn around.



Good to see your back.

hud 91gt 12-22-2020 06:23 AM

Heard this on the radio yesterday and thought it was pretty funny.

https://www.citynews1130.com/2020/12...holiday-plans/

westopher 12-22-2020 06:45 AM

They need to stop using the word “bubble” interchangeably with household for clarity. I’ve had the same conversation with people about how they can see their friends (their bubble) in restaurants but can’t have them over and how it doesn’t make sense. I have to explain to them that they can’t see their friends in restaurants either. That said Horgan should have a better understanding of the rules than rob the contractor or whatever.

pastarocket 12-22-2020 08:27 AM

This is a good article to read about viruses.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/22/afric...ntl/index.html

Summary of this article:

Once a new virus begins circulating among humans, the consequences of a brief encounter at the edge of a forest or at a wet market could be devastating. Covid-19 has shown that. Ebola has proved it. And in most of the scientific publications there is an assumption that there will be more contagions coming as humans continue to destroy wilderness habitats. It's not an "IF" it's a "WHEN".

The solution is clear. Protect the forests to protect humanity -- because Mother Nature has deadly weapons in her armory.


Mother Nature can be a big, bad, bitch if she wants to be in response to humanity's disrgard for the environment. :heckno:

welfare 12-22-2020 09:12 AM

Wasn't it proven that it didn't come from the wet market? There were cases much earlier than that outbreak that had no connection to the wet market.

quasi 12-22-2020 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hud 91gt (Post 9011262)
Heard this on the radio yesterday and thought it was pretty funny.

https://www.citynews1130.com/2020/12...holiday-plans/

Typical, like when the Governor of California was telling people no large gatherings. stay in your bubble then goes and meets friends at a birthday dinner with a group of 11 or 12.

To be fair I think in Horgan's case he just didn't know the rules, that said I mean he of all people should really know what Dr Henry is telling everyone else to do.

Manic! 12-22-2020 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp (Post 9011220)
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard wants to re-introduce a WWII era law that allows them to put a temporary heavy tax on corporations that made larger profits due to the pandemic, and use it to bail out small businesses that suffered due to the pandemic.

Seems like something most normal people would support :considered:

NDP tried that here but was blocked in parliament.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ndp...-day-1.5789923




Quote:

New Democratic Party Leader Jagmeet Singh says his party will call for a new tax on wealthy Canadians and another on businesses that have profited excessively during the COVID-19 pandemic when it sets the topic of debate in the House of Commons on Thursday.

At a news conference today, Singh said workers, families and small businesses shouldn't bear the burden of paying down the public debt incurred by the federal government to fund COVID-19 support measures.

"To pay for the programs, the help that people need ... it should not be families, and people, and workers, and small businesses who have struggled," Singh told reporters. "It should be those who have profited off the pandemic, it should be the ultra-wealthy that contribute their fair share."

https://www.ndp.ca/news/liberals-con...adian-families

Quote:

Liberals, Conservatives and Bloc side with wealthy instead of Canadian families

OTTAWA – At a time when Canadians are worried about who will pay for the pandemic and the recovery, the Liberals, Conservatives and the Bloc joined forces to vote against making the wealthy pay their fair share. Today, they voted against the NDP motion calling on the government to impose a one percent wealth tax on those who profited off the pandemic while families struggled to make ends meet.

“In the middle of a second wave, people across the country are worried about having their services cut by the government to cover the cost of the recovery. It shouldn’t be that way,” said the Leader of the NDP, Jagmeet Singh. “The Liberals and the other parties that voted against a wealth tax are not in it for everyday people. Those who made billions off this crisis should pay for the recovery. Not families struggling to pay their bills.”

Hondaracer 12-22-2020 10:12 AM

Well, failed my work health assessment this morning. Woke up feeling kinda gross achey all over no fever or anything though but 811 still recommended a test, off I go

whitev70r 12-22-2020 10:49 AM

^ #RSismyfamily ... like how you're feeling terrible, about to go for Covid test, but wait ... let me check in on RS and tell my fam first!

Hondaracer 12-22-2020 11:03 AM

RS Fam comes first

JDMDreams 12-22-2020 11:38 AM

I think the work health assessment are bs, basically everyone lies and say they have nothing cuz they look down on you for staying home cuz you have a slight cough. Obviously everyone says they are fatigued and doesn't want to go to work.

320icar 12-22-2020 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JDMDreams (Post 9011290)
I think the work health assessment are bs, basically everyone lies and say they have nothing cuz they look down on you for staying home cuz you have a slight cough. Obviously everyone says they are fatigued and doesn't want to go to work.

You know your body best, be your own judge. Our work has medical obvs so if we need to take 2 weeks off it’s paid thru short term LOA with doctors note.

I get headaches all the time. Whether from caffeine withdrawal or a rainy day after a week of sun (aparently pretty common). But if I have a really bad migraine or something suspicious maybe take the day off. I also have a 7mo old at home so obviously I’m always tired/fatigued. The point is you know your body, you know what’s normal and what isnt

Ch28 12-22-2020 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JDMDreams (Post 9011290)
I think the work health assessment are bs, basically everyone lies and say they have nothing cuz they look down on you for staying home cuz you have a slight cough. Obviously everyone says they are fatigued and doesn't want to go to work.

Part of that is the North American work culture looking down upon their employees taking sick days off. The entire workforce would be stronger and healthier if that negative stigma was removed from it. You're seeing more and more companies transition sick days into 'personal health days' or 'mental wellness days' because they understand that their employees are humans and there are days where we all feel like absolute shit for no reason. The mental health benefits alone would be awesome.

Far too many companies issue some sort of "attendance wellness program" where it's basically HR giving you shit and having all their eyes on you because you've taken more sick days than others. It's utter bullshit.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net