REVscene Automotive Forum

REVscene Automotive Forum (https://www.revscene.net/forums/)
-   Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events (https://www.revscene.net/forums/vancouver-off-topic-current-events_50/)
-   -   Official 2008/2009 Canucks Thread (https://www.revscene.net/forums/535947-official-2008-2009-canucks-thread.html)

zuN 05-23-2009 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AzNightmare (Post 6433507)
...the song is kinda catchy, but I hate it, because I had nightmares of this song after Canucks lost.

I hate it too but i find it annoying rather than catchy.

AzNightmare 05-23-2009 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by murd0c (Post 6433583)
in the playoffs teams have 3 goalies for situtations like this. In the reg season you can't do that because your 3rds on your AHL team. Kyle Jones from Delta was San Jose's 3rd back up this year and he hasn't played a NHL game yet. I work with his uncle and some of the storys from him just being up for 2 weeks they were pretty good.

Who was the third goalie Canucks suit up during the playoffs? It seemed like we only have one goalie in this team... lol


Quote:

Originally Posted by zuN (Post 6433773)
I hate it too but i find it annoying rather than catchy.

Oh, believe me, it was damn annoying during the playoffs... but i'm starting to get over it... slowly... :(

Not really racist! 05-23-2009 09:46 PM

Malkin is on fireee

Xnova 05-24-2009 12:28 AM

do u guys know if the canucks store in gm place will have discount on their merchandise since the seasons over?

trancehead 05-24-2009 12:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Not really racist! (Post 6433440)
As the commentator said... the puck was in his damn fucking skates and he was looking for it WITH HIS HEAD DOWN.

Comeback partially succesful

just gotta keep the pressure up in the 3rd

+1 exactly
in Don Cherry fashion...

REMEMBER KIDS,
KEEP YOUR FUCKING HEAD UP

Soundy 05-24-2009 07:28 AM

...
Quote:

Appeasing TV gods costs NHL its dignity
Cam Cole, Canwest News Service
Published: Saturday, May 23, 2009


Every time you think the National Hockey League can't possibly sink any lower in its subservience to the great god Television, Gary Bettman's outfit gives us fresh evidence there is still plenty of grovelling room in the subbasement.

Here's the latest embarrassment: the league announced Friday that unless both the Eastern and Western conference final series ended in sweeps--meaning by Tuesday night, when the Pittsburgh Penguins would play their Game 4 in Raleigh, N. C. -- the Stanley Cup final would not begin until June 5.

Now, never mind that this could mean 10 days between games for the Penguins if, say, they were to sweep Carolina while Detroit took even five games to polish off the Chicago Blackhawks. The Wings, under that scenario, would go eight days between games.

It's worse than that.

After lollygagging through the first three rounds of playoffs with nonsensical extra off-days thrown in willy nilly, the NHL is prepared to play Games 1 and 2 of the Cup final on back-to-back nights, because NBC is weak in prime time on Fridays and Saturdays, and will deign to telecast both games if the NHL doesn't mind twisting itself into a pretzel to co-operate.

And in that case . . . well, do the math.

If they play on the 5th and 6th, and go every second day from that point on, they would play Game 3 on June 8, Game 4 on the 10th, and so on, meaning a possible Game 7 on the 16th, a day later than the NHL's written-in-stone pledge to have the season end by June 15.

So to keep its promise, the league would have to schedule another back-to-back within the series.

No two Stanley Cup final games have been played on consecutive dates since 1954, when the Red Wings played Game 4 in Montreal on April 10, and the teams travelled to Detroit for Game 5 on April 11.

And that's when the playoffs consisted of only two rounds.

In the modern era, such an idea would be considered preposterous: four rounds into the playoffs, when fatigue and injuries have mounted, playing on back-to-back nights--maybe twice in the same series?

Absurd. Unconscionable.

If the series begins June 5 and goes seven, it would be the latest-finishing Stanley Cup final in a non-Olympic year since 1999, when Brett Hull's toe-in-the-crease goal won it for Dallas at 1:30 a. m. Eastern, on June 20--after which I distinctly recall NHL senior vice-president of hockey operations Colin Campbell telling me the league simply had to find a way to end the hockey season before June.

But in the NHL's scruple-free administration, anything goes to appease U. S. television.

If the league's owners had the stones they were born with, they might actually rise up and challenge the commissioner once in a while when his desire to be bigger than he (or the league) really is-- regardless of the cost to its dignity --makes hockey look pathetic.

But he has led them this far, and they have drunk his Kool-Aid. Evidently, they are unwilling, or unable, to rally in the name of common sense.

Vancouver Sun

punkwax 05-24-2009 07:53 AM

:gun: Bettman.

mickz 05-24-2009 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mugen (Post 6434800)
do u guys know if the canucks store in gm place will have discount on their merchandise since the seasons over?

They don't. They'll have a tent sale during the summer where they'll get rid of old merchandise that doesn't sell (ex. Naslund jerseys, ugly shirts nobody buys) and that's about it.

Xnova 05-24-2009 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mickz (Post 6434990)
They don't. They'll have a tent sale during the summer where they'll get rid of old merchandise that doesn't sell (ex. Naslund jerseys, ugly shirts nobody buys) and that's about it.

ooo damn. thanks anyway!

JayF 05-24-2009 10:35 AM

I wouldn't mind getting a Naslund Jersey.

Harvey Specter 05-24-2009 12:33 PM

Fuck, why couldn't we get Huet in net!

cctw 05-24-2009 02:36 PM

i have a question..who gets the win?..osgood or conklin?..how is it determined lol

ChaKo 05-24-2009 02:44 PM

im pretty sure the win goes to osgood. i think the only way conklin would've gotten credit was if the hawks took the lead for a period after osgood left.

does anybody know if there's a requirement for the distribution of stanley cup rings? do players have to play a certain number of games and receive ice time? or is simply being on the roster enough?

Kilinim 05-24-2009 02:46 PM

I'm pretty sure being on the roster is enough.

winson604 05-24-2009 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cctw (Post 6435322)
i have a question..who gets the win?..osgood or conklin?..how is it determined lol

If a goalie leaves the game while having a lead and that lead is intact for the rest of the game then that goalie gets the win. The second the losing team ties the game after the goalie left, the 2nd goalie will get the win or loss depening on outcome.

Razor Ramon HG 05-24-2009 02:46 PM

The winning/losing goaltenders are determined by which goaltenders were on the ice during the time the GWG was scored.

mickz 05-24-2009 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Notorious MSG (Post 6435333)
The winning/losing goaltenders are determined by which goaltenders were on the ice during the time the GWG was scored.

Ding Ding Ding.

Happened once in Colorado where Patrick Roy had to get off the ice (an equipment problem IIRC) so they had to put Craig Billington in for a whistle and didn't face a single shot. Coincidentally the Avs scored what happened to be the GWG and Billington got the win even though he only played 1 min.

trancehead 05-24-2009 03:28 PM

Detroit is so ridiculously stacked...
even with Lidstrom, Datsyuk, and (Helm?) out they take a commanding 6-1 win.

nsmb 05-24-2009 04:04 PM

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNj5MGCmP8Y[/youtube]

LOLOLOLOL

Gh0stRider 05-24-2009 04:14 PM

woot woot!! 6 -1 !

Gh0stRider 05-24-2009 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trancehead (Post 6435364)
Detroit is so ridiculously stacked...
even with Lidstrom, Datsyuk, and (Helm?) out they take a commanding 6-1 win.

Helm was in, Draper was out.

Gh0stRider 05-24-2009 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaKo (Post 6435330)
im pretty sure the win goes to osgood. i think the only way conklin would've gotten credit was if the hawks took the lead for a period after osgood left.

does anybody know if there's a requirement for the distribution of stanley cup rings? do players have to play a certain number of games and receive ice time? or is simply being on the roster enough?

You have to play a number of games. I can't remember the exact number though. I might be wrong on this.

To get their name on the cup, they have to appear in 41 regular-season games or one Stanley Cup Final game.

winson604 05-24-2009 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaKo (Post 6435330)
im pretty sure the win goes to osgood. i think the only way conklin would've gotten credit was if the hawks took the lead for a period after osgood left.

does anybody know if there's a requirement for the distribution of stanley cup rings? do players have to play a certain number of games and receive ice time? or is simply being on the roster enough?

Well for the cup engraving players appearing in 41 regular-season games or one Stanley Cup Final game for the championship team have their names engraved on the Cup. The NHL makes exceptions for players who do not meet the standard because of injury or other extenuating circumstances.

As for rings that's distributed by the team and I don't think there are any NHL rules for that.

Harvey Specter 05-24-2009 04:35 PM

LOL @ the Hawks. Where all the shit talkers for the Hawks now?

trancehead 05-24-2009 04:39 PM

,


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net