Quote:
Originally Posted by Noir
(Post 6492590)
This guy is the absolute pinnacle of Canuck idiotness. I wish the guy could just listen to him talk.
Prior July 1st, he favours a Splash. Now he's all up in MG's jock for opting not make splash :rolleyes: Then he backtracks and says retaining our players is a SPLASH.
then in the earlier topic of Matts Sundin's worth of $10 million last year vs. Gaborik's worth being $7.5 on his contract expiry.
He responds:
When just a page before, he knocks on Gaborik because inflated contracts shouldn't be necessitated by "intangibles" which for some reason, he has no qualms with Sundin being offered $10million for 2 years. (supposedly for this year and last's) :rolleyes:
Lastly, post July 1st, he comments on how superstar contracts have a tendency to "handcuff" teams yet he has no qualms that our own superstars handcuff our team. (ie. Luongo asking for $8m) :rolleyes:
Seriously. Mike Gillis could fart and Hondaracer would think it's a good move. His arguments and opinions swing back and forth so much depending on which way is most convenient of sucking Canuck balls. That lack of objectivity seriously negates the merits of his opinions.
|
What so now every fucking post i have to think out my exact points or else they get broken down by your faggot ass?
As i said before, resigning the sedins was a "splash" and you cant tell me otherwise
Please explain to me how players who take LESS then market value handcuff your team? if a player can make more somewhere else, yet takes less to stay in Vancouver they are doing Vancouver a favor and not "handcuffing" them per say because they are leaving money on the table which can be used in other places, to sign other players, and re-up other contracts which will be coming forward in the future
You don't think Gaborik at 7.5 handcuffs the rangers? you don't think Jaybo at 6.7 handcuffs the flames? OF COURSE IT DOES because it's taking money away from positions and leaving gaps of which cannot be filled by "role" players, the sedins are 6 million are a steal and offer so much more than both those players in terms of overall performance, both are more reliable and fit better in Vancouver than arguably any of the FA's that were out there.
and please please tell me what parts of the Samuelsson deal is so offending to you? when i say its a good signing and I throw a little optimism into the future of the club, im riding MG's dick? the only downside of the deal is the length of term, other than that, could you really ask for a better fit cap/team wise than him?
as i said before, insane physical specimen, has played on the same line as the sedins in the Olympics, a right handed shot, and a player with cup experience
but no, this is a horrible move right?
there's a difference between an optimistic educated fan and a homer, as there is a difference between a pessimistic fan, and just a hater.
fuck off im tired of your shit
