Quote:
Originally Posted by DanHibiki
(Post 8072610)
after purchasing an iphone 4, I can't go back to anything that doesn't have a crisp screen |
Agreed. You don't notice the difference as much going from an iPad 2 to the new iPad, but boy do you notice it when you switch back.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronin
(Post 8072845)
And are all Android tablet apps really just upscaled phone apps? They're not optimized for larger screens? Or is that just Mac-centric website speak? |
No, that's an fairly accurate statement. Some aren't, but most are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp
(Post 8072859)
The OS itself before 4.0, totally.
The main problem with Android tablets is lack of tablet specific apps. But you can say that about anything that isn't iOS right now. Once Apple gives up their market share (which they are doing at a faster pace every quarter) developers should start making more Android and Win RT versions of their apps. |
Ask Eric Schmidt about that. Last December, when Android had pretty much caught up to iOS for marketshare, he was asked by an audience member about the disparity in developer interest and why developers favored iOS by more than 2:1. His prediction was that in 6 months (we're now at 11, BTW) you'd see those numbers switch and developers would favor Android over iOS. The reason Schmidt gave was "Android has more marketshare and developers follow the market." Well, it's still over 2:1 for iOS over Android and despite Android's larger market share developers still haven't gone over.
This is easy to understand if you're a developer, but difficult for the consumer (or fanboy). Android is a clusterfuck of an OS when compared to RT or iOS. Since this is a car site, I'll use a car analogy:
iOS is like taking the 414HP BMW M3 V8 engine and dual clutch gearbox and putting them into something plain like an Accord or Camry. Works great, fast, but a little bland/boring for some.
Android is like taking an over-boosted 4 cylinder home made turbocharged Civic engine cranking out 300HP and putting it into a body of a Ferrari. Looks great with all the widgets and eye candy, still performs OK, but underneath it's a patched together OS.
RT is in the middle. It has the superior engine/gearbox in a car that's not as fancy as Android, but nicer than iOS. Maybe a 3 Series or Audi A4.
With your Camry/Accord, it's really easy to add your own stereo, rims/tires, suspension or body kits. It's very difficult to replace your engine/gearbox. Likewise, it's easy for iOS or RT to add new "features" to their OS, but it's difficult for Android to update their "engine".
Perfect example, Android adding ALSR to ICS. Sounds good on paper, but it was a half-baked attempt that didn't do anything. They might as well have left it out. They updated it again in Jelly Bean and now it does what it's supposed to do. Unfortunately, as of Nov 1st (according to Google) Jelly Bean is now on 2.7% of devices while ICS is on 25.8%. Gingerbread 54.2%.
This brings us to another reason developers haven't switched. Market share vs OS version. JB is very good, but nobody is using it. Why would a developer waste time writing for such a small number of devices? And by the time JB starts getting market penetration Key Lime Pie will be out and the cycle repeats, that is, most Android devices are running two versions behind.
Meanwhile iOS has hit 60% adoption in only a few weeks after it was launched. If I write an App using the latest iOS 6 API's I know it will work on any iOS device, including the crappy 3GS.
Google needs to put their foot down and make it mandatory for OEM's and carriers to release Android updates within a specific time after Google releases it. OEM's for Android don't give a damn about supporting older devices as they make no money from them. Yet it costs money to have your software engineers port over Jelly Bean to those older devices. With Apple, they still get revenue from older iOS devices through the App Store and iTunes. They also have higher customer retention because of this. So they have more incentive to support older devices longer than Android does.
I think Win RT is going to have a tough go because they're trying to get into a new market and people want Apps for their devices. Like iOS, RT has one big advantage - it's written by a company that understands how to make an OS (from 30 years of previous attempts, successes and failures). For the first time ever, we have been able to see two mobile OS's run on the same processor (Tegra 3). And RT on Tegra 3 outperforms Android on Tegra 3. Which show MS still knows how to optimize an OS.
I don't think RT will take much market share from iOS, but I bet it steals a lot from Android. With the Surface and Mini coming out at the same time, I think this holiday season is not going to look good for Android, Nook or Amazon.