![]() | |
Can we just go back to folding dollar bills so many times that an eye appears above a pyramid or whatever? |
So the guy was either a right wing nutjob raised by MAGA retards, or just a dejected online shitter who lost grip on reality. All the talk of "libtards" and "hardcore lefties" being so violent came to a quick halt as soon as that came out https://i.imgur.com/ColEf4E.png Charlie getting killed by a Groyper literally as he attempted gaslight a college campus with his gang violence rhetoric makes it even more suitable (I can't say ironic anymore) |
I still don’t get why this is news when: Russia attacked Poland. Could start ww3 if article 5 is engaged JewBag yahooooo!!! Bombs Qatar. Could destabilize the entire region some more. China and crazies starting a huge alliance and military parade now featuring India. Fuck this guy. |
Quote:
Cheers, |
^ Hey you sure you’re not a blonde bimbo who works for Fox News ?!? If so…. Ni Hao ma mei mei ? |
https://www.thedailybeast.com/charli...y-is-all-maga/ Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/europe...-assassination |
Quote:
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
because Charlie Kirk is CLOSER to the president than those other people. It's not a hard concept to understand. You'd stand up for your friend or ally first before some fucking no body that you never met or knew. Kirk also helped convince a lot of people to vote for trump. DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF A CLOSE ALLY? Quote:
Quote:
only the sick and depraved. the most lowest of human beings would cheer for that shit. 68 style really thinks he's hot shit. like he thinks I WOULD BE THE KILLER? LOL the one that's been preaching honour and being respectful. when he is preaching eye for an eye? bro if we were put into extreme situations, you'd fucking pull the trigger first. if you were hanging off a cliff by your last ounce of strength, I'd still reach out and pull you up despite our differences. you'd be the fucking guy that let someone fall off cuz you disagreed with their views. you've got no honour in you dude. you're completely blindsided by your own views. willing to cheer when someone gets violently killed. and justify it by saying an eye for an eye. wtf is wrong with you. |
this thread totally reveals the REAL MONSTERS. those cheering for his death, those completely justifying his death with excuses lol. doesn't matter if you're right wing left wing, what your religion is or whatever. you don't CHEER for death. you can accept it as part of life or war or whatever, but you don't cheer for it. you guys are sick fucks for real. totally fake. fake crying about the kids that get blown up in Gaza, then cheering for some dude who gets his neck blown out. totally two faced. all one has to do to manipulate you guys is to switch the narrative and you'd be cheering for the other side. cheering for the deaths of the other side. justifying it with your values. completely brainless. fucking NPCs. |
Quote:
People danced in the streets when Bin Laden died, they celebrated when Saddam died, they held parades when Hitler died. People were glad those monsters were dead. |
If my horrible old hag of a secretary dies tomorrow I’d be out dancing in the streets like I liberated Fallujah |
Normal people: "For those who don't know, here's why this person was bad, here are some things he said, and here's why this shooting was not just ironic, but almost predictable based on what this guy put out over the last 5 or 10 years" People who have cooked their brains: "OMG you guys are CHEERING FOR DEATH YOU ARE ALL MONSTERS. I know for a fact that if you feel bad about Gaza being wiped off the face of the earth, you are only pretending, because you don't feel the same way about this guy. Totally two faced!" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
^reason number 10002324323533 having East Indians is a good for Canada. This guy is goat. |
Quote:
You need to get off whatever the fuck you're on bud. Can't even keep people straight. The only thing you got right is that I think you're fucking crazy and you're not doing much to dissuade that notion. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Taking a modern day example, RFK Jr. is going to inflict mass suffering in the US - many people will die because of his views on science and medicine. How many people need to die before he turns into a villain and we celebrate his death? Do we have to wait till child mortality returns to what it was in 1900 when nearly 1 in 5 children in the US died before the age of 5 and then it's ok to celebrate because he's Medical Hitler? Or can the doctors who are waving huge red flags on him today celebrate if he were to complete his journey into becoming shoe leather today? Regarding Kirk - maybe he doesn't rise to that to the people here because he didn't directly harm you or maybe you're unfamiliar with his work but he did harm a lot of people. He actively directed his followers to target certain communities and ruined a lot of lives and put a lot of people in danger. There are certainly a group of people who, when they celebrate his death, are just releasing the feelings that Kirk created. |
It’s not some run of the mill “left celebrates the death of the right” thing. Someone like John Rustad or PP or pick 99% of right wing politicians and normal people would not be posting a negative thing about them. Charlie Kirk was a leader of the rally for overt racism and bigotry towards multiple groups of people. He said if his daughter was raped he would make her carry the baby to term. He said black women do not have the thinking power to be successful so they need to steal jobs from qualified white men. He said the civil rights act was a mistake. These words put onto a massive platform to indoctrinate disenfranchised young people due to falling quality of life in their country from their OWN government and place blame on minority groups is not only dangerous, it’s fucking abhorrent. The far right and far left comparison is an absolute fallacy. The far right is based on removing rights from those deemed lesser through historical acts of violence and policy where the far left is campaigning on protecting these people. No one is talking about banning Christianity, banning straight marriage or adoptions. The party who claims to be about freedom is trying to only create freedom for a group they deem worthy, while only providing freedom for small facets of society with things like gun laws, forced Christianity in school, at the expense of those they deem unworthy. Being a mouthpiece for these beliefs and policies to enrich themselves does not make someone a hero. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:16 AM. | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net