Love this version of O Canada, sounds like it's being played on a Casio keyboard

Interesting coverage of the CHL rape lawsuit just now, in that they made to sure to point out that the allegations were "not proven in court" and that the alleged victim was "intoxicated" when it happened

Pool party scores! 2-2!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

TIE GAME!

What a game

welp

What a crazy game haha. Fast and Furious frenzy of goals now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

LOL what is happening?!?!

The Official 2021/2022 Canucks & NHL Thread
 

Tie game! 4-4.


Four goals in 1 minute, 11 seconds.

What a barn burner of a game! LUL

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is some beer league scoring here loool
Goalies suck tn

This sure some entertaining hockey

BATTLE OF ALBERTA!@@@@!@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@!!@

Let's go!! Another 15 goal game!!

That was kicked in

Also pushed the goalie

They should challenge this

Ahhahaha no goallllll

LOL

Color guy acting like it's not the most obvious no-goal ever :fulloffuck:

Doesn't matter that it was going in anyway

The Official 2021/2022 Canucks & NHL Thread
 

Good call!

That is a kicking motion on that skate.

There is no way the Flamers can argue that Coleman was trying to stop with one skate on the ice while he was being checked.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That’s bullshit, what was he suppose to do?

His other leg was off the ice caught behind him, is he suppose to lift that “kicking” leg off the ice too?

Edit* I guarantee you when they go back to the panel all of them are going to say that was the wrong call.

Wow just wow. Coleman was able to kick that on the leg he was balancing on?

A year ago I would have argued in favour of the goal, but after something similar happened to the Canucks I learned how they call it, and they'll call it this way every time

IMO.... bad call according to the rules.

No distinctive kicking motion.
There is no rule against "strategic placement" of the skate. He didn't sweep the feet to propel the puck in.

That's the wrong call. There was zero direction change and the puck had 100% enough momentum to go in regardless.
Furthermore there was no option for player to use other leg to stop, was literally their only move to make.

Lol when a guy who’s called hockey at every level for the last 20+ years is saying that’s one of the most controversial playoff goals ever, it’s definitely not a cut and dry thing.

They used to have the wording “distinct kicking motion” and that definitely wasn’t it as he was already stopping on that skate prior to hitting the puck, it wasn’t a separate motion

They just want people to tune in to the intermission and post game shows

The color guy I assume is a Flames homer, since he won't consider it at all

I'll wait for the official explanation but based on what I've seen when I was shocked at a call last year, this is how they call it

Rhudey is the regular flames Color guy so yea, he obviously sides with the flames

But cuthbert has called so many big games etc. golden goal, countless juniors and NHL playoff games etc. I’d like to think he is at least neutral and isn’t just playing it up for the commentary