AzNightmare | 05-26-2010 01:28 AM | Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor Ramon HG
(Post 6965601)
"Sedin's goal wins if you've actually watched hockey before 2004. Flames fans are just bitter they lost yet another thing to the Canucks this year. Division title, POY, and of course Hank barely edging Iginla for the Art Ross by 43 points."
"That play by the Sedins transcends the world of sport. Henryk's extra-sensory perception is almost spiritual and Daniel's fluid movement was like something Legolas would do in a battle. Humankind took a step forward with that play. We are all greater now."
Some of the comments are just too epic. | Well, removing my homer-ism, I can understand the Flames point of view from some of the comments. It's Kiprusoff vs Daniel Sedin. Not "The Sedins." Anything from before Daniel touched the puck technically shouldn't have been included in part of the vote. After the ESP pass, had Daniel just wristed it 5 hole to score. The video wouldn't have even been nominated for this contest. Most of the votes were probably taken in factor of the complete play as well as the "importance" of that game. (Hat trick, and Henrik racking enough pts to win the scoring title). So then when you break it down to just purely the save vs the goal, we've seen many between the leg shots like that over the years, but seldom (actually I personally never) seen a save like that before, but I'll give the benefit of the doubt that Hasek probably pulled off a few of these.
Oh well, I would have voted for Daniel anyway, but just my honest non-Canuck-biased opinion. Quote:
Originally Posted by Nodnarb
(Post 6965442)
^ Weird question.
lol
Side note: Jack Johnson is a tool. | Well, I've always wondered about it.
If people are paying so much for a worn jersey, what's the difference between a replica with Kesler printed on the back, and one that was actually worn? I assume his sweat is still ingrained in the sweater or something. Not like people would sniff it or something, but I assume it's something collector's would value? I dunno. It costs $1000, so I assume it has to be unique when compared with a replica. |