![]() |
Nichushkin off to KHL on a two year deal. Gone are the Nuke and Horvat comparisons / I wishes Stars' Nichushkin signs two-year KHL deal - Article - TSN |
just for fun going back to the 2010 entry draft if you have the power to go back in time, knowing what you know today, and draft anyone we we didn't draft at that position (ie. you can't draft anyone already drafted before our pick) what would our lineup look like today? limit to 2 changes per draft year to keep things simple |
Quote:
Seguin, Hall, Tarasenko all in the first round. That was a pretty strong draft year. I love how the Canucks took Adam Polasek at pick # 145. What is with the Canucks and picking Polaseks? :spamarama: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libor_Pol%C3%A1%C5%A1ek Worst. Pick. Evar. |
this is what I came up with 2010 (instead of McNally and Polasek) J. Klingberg - D B. Gallagher - RW stand pat on other picks 2011 (instead of Jensen and Honzik) B. Saad - LW J. Gaudreau - LW stand pat on other picks 2012 (instead of Mallet) D. Severson - D stand pat on other picks 2013 stand pat 2014 (instead of Virtanen) D. Larkin stand pat on other picks Sedin Sedin Eriksson Saad Larkin Gallagher Gaudreau Horvat Hansen Baertschi Sutter Burrows extra: Dorsett, Etem, Granlund Edler-Tanev Klingberg-Gudbranson Hutton-Tryamkin Severson-Sbisa extra: Pedan, Stecher, Larsen goalies: Markstrom, Miller, Demko Is this team good enough to go the distance? |
2010 - klingberg, stone 2011 - saad gaudreau 2012- Gostisbehere 2013- Theodore (no shink, no granlund trade) 2014 -larkin, demko (24th), Montour (no McCann, no gudbranson trade) sedin-sedin-eriksson gudreau-larkin-stone saad-horvat-rodin baer-sutter-hansen edler-tanev hutton-klingberg ghost-tryamkin Theodore miller markstrom 2.8mil over cap :( assuming gaud gets 7mil |
Thanks for reminding us how terrible Canucks scouting is. |
:derp: totally forgot about Ghost damn...if only the D pairings looked like that |
the only real miss we had was saad. he was higher ranked, more of the offensive player gillis liked, amazing how he wasn't picked. aqua decision? couldn't have projected the others at the time. Virtanen is still too early to complain about |
with those guys we drafter in those years are any of them still with the canucks? |
2010-2013. 4 drafts. 25 picks. friesen 2010 6th -ahl grenier 2011 3rd -ahl labate 2011 4th -ahl gaunce 2012 1st -ahl hutton 2012 5th -nhl horvat 2013 1st -nhl cassels 2013 3rd -ahl subban 2013 4th -ahl cederholm 2013 5th -loan to shl rest have been traded for others/let go 2013 1st shinkaruk for granlund (2nd 2011) 2011 1st Jensen for etem (2010 1st) 2011 4th McNally for 2015 7th all I can think of |
Remember we could've drafted kopitar!!!!! Lol It's all hindsight. But what frustrates me is that we didn't really see any overhaul of the scouting department. We've seen coaches come and go but scouting? Only minor changes. Scouting for benning so far has been pretty good. Need some time to see how it pans out but virtanen, demko, boeser, juolevi, tryamkin. It's been way better than gillis, no is era. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Letting Willie do his job would be responding with, "That's up to Willie." Boldly announcing BEFORE TRAINING CAMP that Miller is the #1 and he's already penciled in for 55 games is taking over/preventing Willie from doing his job ... and creates the optics of a rift between coaching and management if Markstrom starts more than Miller. It would be different had Miller substantially outplayed Markstrom, but that wasn't the case last season. Quote:
So, on one hand, we have a guy who admittedly can't handle a #1 workload in the Western Conference (and the GM penciling him in for more games than he's ever played in a Canucks uniform) ... and, on the other hand, we have a question mark who has never been a #1. And the point is that Markstrom is the #2 on a top team in the World Cup (also was the #1 in the World Championships in May) while Miller wasn't even a consideration (Yes, I'm aware Sweden has fewer options in goal). Quote:
|
Why do people bother arguing with Jmac... |
While there is projected talent from a draft. How great is the affect of post draft development? I'm just throwing in the hypothetical of maybe said player from another team wouldn't have developed as well due to management, on ice leadership, etc. Or someone we drafted would have flourished with specific guidance from teammates, playing environment from another team, etc. Thoughts/opinions on that? |
Quote:
He also has to point it out, because in Vancouver they love to take goal tending controversies to the next level. We all know that by the end of the year, the one who plays the most will be the one thats playing best, and that will be Markstrom. Yet its difficult for goalies to jump from the ahl to nhl even if its 30 games. then theres another jump from 30 to 50 games. By slowly increasing their amount of games while not putting pressure on them and saying "hey, hes out number 1. instead of 31 games, hes gonna play 60 and carry us to the playoffs" it helps them progress. Florida basically threw markstrom to the wolves when he didnt have the experience or stamina for 30 games, and it destroyed his confidence, and play. you dont want that happening again, when hes bounced back. let him flourish slowly, and take over with a veteran backup next year who can cover 25-40games if need be. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
:lawl: |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
By saying its all up to Willie, you're basically pre-throwing him under the bus if the players don't deliver. Based on the previous 2 seasons, expecting miller to start ONLY 55 is perfectly reasonable, and allows him to keep the #1 title deservedly or not. Last 2 seasons he's probably pencilled in for 65-70 games due to the relative unknowns in the backups. The coach is given limits on how much he can ride miller bc we saw last season at times miller being over played when he got strings of consecutive games. He'll inevitably battle at least an injury or 2, so realistically the split will be close to 50/50. Quote:
Quote:
Miller's no dummy. He knows he's old. He knows he won't be worth 6m a season come next contract in a young mans game. But if Markstrom can't deliver next season, I wouldn't be surprised if Benning offers miller a year or two at 3-4m as a stopgap measure waiting for Markstrom/demko to develop. Its a business, sincerity isn't a requirement |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The Kopitar example is more for the Blue Jackets They really fucked up with Brule |
Bourdon could've became the #1 dman Edler never was. lol But fuck sakes...PATRICK FUCKING WHITE...why did we even draft him in the first round? lol. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net