the_rickster | 07-09-2008 12:14 PM | Quote:
Originally Posted by doubledouble
(Post 5935231)
| seems like facts in the left hand column, and rumors/developments/their opinions in the right. Quote:
Originally Posted by clowe
(Post 5935321)
I would do a Sedins for Kovalchuk trade. Kovalchuk might be the game-breaker that this team needs.
When it matters most, Daniel has 18 pts in 43 playoff games, Henrik has 20 pts in the same 43. They also went cold down the stretch this season when we were trying to make the playoffs. | kovalchuk has fuck all playoff experience (round 1 sweep???). i think the situation that the canucks have to face is that we can replace the sedins with a single marquee player that needs at least one decent line-mate to feed him the puck, or we can keep the sedins who are becoming marquee players (and who are willing to take home-team discounts) and then try to find one decent player (bernier???) to enhance their productivity. gillis said that he isn't going to build the team around the sedins, but i have a feeling they'll be in this city for a while. Quote:
Originally Posted by shawn79
(Post 5935616)
even if we had ovechkin we wouldnt have paid him 10mill
just like bure we will cheap out on him and run him out of town | this is retarded to even talk about, but....ovechkin has a 13 year contract. we'd have to pay him what he signed for. bure was taken advantage of by being offered canadian dollars when he first signed. when he smartened up, he held out. |