![]() |
^ Vegas like. |
The Official 2022/2023 Canucks & NHL Thread Quote:
Colorado used that Super Mario mushroom sound effect after successful penalty kills. Kind of neat to turn part of a game into a video game haha: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
If they play a sound effect after a successful penalty kill, I hope they do it for both teams. Otherwise you could argue it gives an unfair advantage to one team. |
Quote:
Also it's the Avs that play the Mario sound |
Quote:
|
Bwahahahaha...................... Spoiler! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Goal light & song for the home team happens after play has stopped. |
It's like when goalies would slap the ice with their sticks after a penalty ends... Can't have one team slappin' while the other gets Mario sounds lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
^ then going by that logic, they should play a sound 5 secs before the visiting team finishes their penalty kill? How about we agree that playing a sound after any team's penalty kill is not necessary? |
Kuzmenko staying. 2yr contract. $5.5M cap hit. https://www.nhl.com/news/andrei-kuzm...ks/c-340446842 |
Quote:
The stadium staff shouldn't do anything that could affect the game during play. As for the crowd, you can't control that and sometimes the crowd will turn against the home team... |
Quote:
Fuck sakes man.. this is like as middle of the ground fucking risk exposure as you can get. And again just speaks to this muddling retool fuckkk |
Tradition has always been to stop any kind of music/advertisement jingles as soon as the puck is dropped. Out of respect to the players, I guess. As for slapping of the stick by the goalie, that's done by the team with the advantage to warn their teammates that the power play is about to expire. Not after, gulolol. Having said all that, the announcer goes on the PA to announce details of a goal during play. Are you guys sure the sound clip is played for both teams? That doesn't make sense. It's meant to say, "Good Job, Guys!" (power up). Anyway, looks like Kraken fans aren't too sure what the sound clip is. We here on RS know................. |
Quote:
He would be worth at least a draft pick. Good luck in trying to create cap space for the team. FailFish |
Everyone was saying he’d fetch a first + |
Quote:
sunk by the Kraken last night, gulolol |
Yah, kinda puzzled by that signing. Well, if contract is favourable, he can still be traded at deadline. Maybe with a reasonable 2 yr amount, he would be more attractive to another team. Without this, they would just get a rental with no guarantee? And if Canucks do keep him next year on the roster, he can still be trade bait again, assuming he performs at this level. Just tell me he doesn't have a NVM clause. |
12 team no-trade I believe. |
I think the rationale of signing Kuz is pissing Petey off and Petey not signing with us. Petey wants to win. If he were to buy into this "retool" in 1-3 years, scorch earth style rebuild is out of the questions. Kuz fits into age group and has chemistry with Petey. Trading Bo / Miller / Boeser / Garland is probably the better option. |
Nah I don't see it that way. Petey and Kuzmenko have formed great chemistry and a seemingly strong bond. Canucks need to find a way to build around a core of Petterson, Kuzmenko, Hughes, Miller, and Demko. Everyone else has gotta go. |
|
Maybe Demko? Ehh |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net