REVscene - Vancouver Automotive Forum


Welcome to the REVscene Automotive Forum forums.

Registration is Free!You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! The banners on the left side and below do not show for registered users!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.


Go Back   REVscene Automotive Forum > Automotive Chat > Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events

Vancouver Off-Topic / Current Events The off-topic forum for Vancouver, funnies, non-auto centered discussions, WORK SAFE. While the rules are more relaxed here, there are still rules. Please refer to sticky thread in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-17-2020, 09:17 PM   #551
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 52,470
Thanked 23,845 Times in 8,207 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzNightmare View Post
I'll admit, that video is TL;DW, so I didn't watch it. I'll just assume based on the first comment, that the cop treated him respectfully for the first 41 mins. But this is the latest news that I read on this incident:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/17/form...at-wendys.html
Fired cop charged with murder in shooting of Rayshard Brooks at Atlanta Wendy’s



I mean... it's sensitive times. But if all this was true. I think it's ridiculous to fire this officer and have him charged for murder. I mean do we live in generation snowflake where you can grab an officer's weapon, use it to threaten him, and still expect to just be told nicely to pretty please put it down?

If I don't have all the info, then sure, I could be very well be addressing this situation all wrong. But based on just what I know above, this is absurd and Rayshard isn't a victim.



LOLwut?? The guy took the taser from the cop and was trying to use it on them...


At what point do we draw the line that when someone has a weapon and is trying to use it against them, can the cop justify shooting back?
I think there's some things to keep in mind, and you will see that a big issue is quality of police officers in dealing with criminals, and the training they receive.

The police searched his car, and then searched him. So they know 100% he was not carrying a weapon. This is important because they know the only weapon he had was the taser, and they knew what happens when you miss with a taser, and especially once he drops it and keeps running, he's no longer a threat to them at that moment.

They tried to subdue him but the two of them couldn't handle a staggeringly drunk man. When the taser was brought out, he was able to get it off before it was used, AND get away, using it HIMSELF to try to escape

The key to me is after he unsuccessfully fired the taser, at what point is he a threat to the cops? Dude was probably running to his sister's house. How can it be "self defense" when you shoot him in the BACK? Was he backing towards you with a discharged taser? Yes "when you point a weapon at a cop, expect to get shot". But what about AFTER you point a weapon, and miss, no longer having a usable weapon, and are running away. Should you expect to get shot and killed when you run away after not harming anyone?

So to me it's just a collection of bad decisions on both sides, leading to tragedy. Murder? I dunno... Disciplinary action? Absolutely. He shouldn't be a cop. Does it emphasize the need to have higher quality officers and better training? Absolutely. Also on a wider scale, does it remind us that racial inequality (not to mention economy class) leads many towards drugs, alcohol and crime? I'm sure many would deny that (I know we'll hear it but i'm not going to respond), but I think that's a huge issue that BLM hopes to begin resolving. And what Bernie wanted to try resolving.

"Defund Police" sounds like people want there to be no cops, but the point is to turn the police more into social workers than "enforcers". Maybe instead of arresting a guy who was drunk driving, sending him further down whatever spiral he was in, let him go home and sober up and maybe get help he desperately needs (which is also not highly accessible, another thing we need to deal with which defund the police may allow). Arresting him may have prevented a car accident from happening that night, but what about when he gets out of jail? The cops actually have that choice, and that's obviously not the choice that was made here, despite the general politeness of the incident before it went to shit. It maybe SHOULD be the default choice, and maybe for some cops it is.
Advertisement
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2020, 09:32 PM   #552
I STILL don't get it
 
MSREE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 464
Thanked 397 Times in 176 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post


Let's paint another scenario of an alternate universe. The police officer didn't shoot but kept on chasing, the dude kept on running and injure/kill someone else in the process either by accident or out or scare.

Who's the media gonna blame now given the video footages?

I'm sure the officer can get off the hook completely by saying BLM.
MSREE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2020, 09:37 PM   #553
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
Manic!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 16,048
Thanked 7,403 Times in 3,475 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post


Let's paint another scenario of an alternate universe. The police officer didn't shoot but kept on chasing, the dude kept on running and injure/kill someone else in the process either by accident or out or scare.

Who's the media gonna blame now given the video footages?

I'm sure the officer can get off the hook completely by saying BLM.
Killing another person how? They should have called for back up and followed him. But the cops were probably too embarrassed to do so.
__________________
Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
Manic! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2020, 09:40 PM   #554
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
welfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: van
Posts: 4,530
Thanked 1,170 Times in 625 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcedhk View Post
Any more info on this?
It's kinda funny, Riddoch electric brings their vehicles to us for service. I've worked on that transit several times.
The young man in the video is the son of the business owner.

Couple co-workers and i were having a good laugh at the fb replies at lunch.
That kid just kept digging his hole deeper and deeper. Calling them terrorists and saying they tried to hit him with their truck when he was the one who jumped out in front of it and told them to hit him. Which Mr. Cheema, the driver and their neighbor, clearly says "i don't want to hit you". Riddoch jr. there playing the "you tried to hit a disabled 20 y/o with your truck!" card. -He messed his leg up from a motorcycle accident awhile ago-

So i guess the story goes Riddoch jr and his buddies were ripping up and down the street on their motorcycles a week or so ago, so Mr Cheema filed a report about it. That's where the little squabble started i guess.
The kid's a real entitled little turd IMO.
And his dad's not much of a party either from what the service advisors tell me. Still don't think his business shoulda got dragged through the mud though when he had nothing to do with it.
__________________
Gold is the money of kings;
Silver is the money of gentlemen;
Barter is the money of peasants;
But debt is the money of slaves.
-Norm Franz

Last edited by welfare; 06-18-2020 at 07:40 AM.
welfare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2020, 10:06 PM   #555
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
welfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: van
Posts: 4,530
Thanked 1,170 Times in 625 Posts
Jesus Christ. You don't resist arrest,then take an officer's weapon away from him during a struggle, fire it at them, and expect the cops to play pattycake.
That's not a precedent anyone should want set.
Wtf world are people living in?
__________________
Gold is the money of kings;
Silver is the money of gentlemen;
Barter is the money of peasants;
But debt is the money of slaves.
-Norm Franz
welfare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2020, 10:19 PM   #556
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 52,470
Thanked 23,845 Times in 8,207 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by welfare View Post
Jesus Christ. You don't resist arrest,then take an officer's weapon away from him during a struggle, fire it at them, and expect the cops to play pattycake.
That's not a precedent anyone should want set.
Wtf world are people living in?
You just justified murder by assuming the only other option is "pattycake"...
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2020, 10:23 PM   #557
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
Hehe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: YVR/TPE
Posts: 4,613
Thanked 2,760 Times in 1,185 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic! View Post
Killing another person how? They should have called for back up and followed him. But the cops were probably too embarrassed to do so.
I'm telling you that it's almost hypocritical to suggest something like that. You are analyzing a la keyboard warrior style AFTER the fact.

Police are trained and sworn to protect. And they are trained to shoot for the torso. It's the largest mass on our body. It was unfortunate that the suspect died from the injury, but what you are saying is that the police was shooting with the idea to kill the suspect. If he was shooting to kill, I think there'd be a lot more shots fired.

In a situation like that, the priority was to neutralize the threat. It was a person with a record, under influence, resisting arrest, armed (to a certain degree), and had the willingness to engage.

If the police didn't neutralize the perceived threat ATM while he still could, he wouldn't be doing his job.

Again... think about the alternate scenario I suggested, it's basically what you are asking, keep on following him... and if another bystander gets hurt because of this decision, who would you blame? Who would the public blame?

Yes I get the argument of "oh he didn't have deadly forces". But he clearly showed the willingness to hurt others in order to get what he wanted. When there is motive, having a weapon or not becomes irrelevant because the person himself is the weapon.
__________________
Nothing for now
Hehe is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-17-2020, 10:45 PM   #558
RS has made me the bitter person i am today!
 
welfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: van
Posts: 4,530
Thanked 1,170 Times in 625 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp View Post
You just justified murder by assuming the only other option is "pattycake"...
I really don't think hitting a moving target, while you're moving, exactly where you want to hit it is as easy as you think, if that's what you're implying.
__________________
Gold is the money of kings;
Silver is the money of gentlemen;
Barter is the money of peasants;
But debt is the money of slaves.
-Norm Franz
welfare is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2020, 11:14 PM   #559
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
underscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Okanagan
Posts: 16,292
Thanked 8,948 Times in 3,887 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MSREE View Post
Well that’s a shame that they don’t have that skill considering they are in possession of deadly weapons.
I assumed they would because carrying a gun is a dangerous responsibility.
The skill to shoot a moving target in the legs with a pistol? That's basically impossible.

Not that he should've been shooting what sounds like a cuffed guy with a spent taser in the back.
__________________
1991 Toyota Celica GTFour RC // 2007 Toyota Rav4 V6 // 2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee
1992 Toyota Celica GT-S ["sold"] \\ 2007 Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD [sold] \\ 2000 Jeep Cherokee [sold] \\ 1997 Honda Prelude [sold] \\ 1992 Jeep YJ [sold/crashed] \\ 1987 Mazda RX-7 [sold] \\ 1987 Toyota Celica GT-S [crushed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by maksimizer View Post
half those dudes are hotter than ,my GF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevYouUp View Post
reading this thread is like waiting for goku to charge up a spirit bomb in dragon ball z
Quote:
Originally Posted by Good_KarMa View Post
OH thank god. I thought u had sex with my wife. :cry:
underscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2020, 11:37 PM   #560
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 52,470
Thanked 23,845 Times in 8,207 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by welfare View Post
I really don't think hitting a moving target, while you're moving, exactly where you want to hit it is as easy as you think, if that's what you're implying.
I don't know what you think I'm suggesting... I'm not the one saying "shoot at his feet" or anything like that. When you shoot at someone, it's center mass to stop them coming at you, and to kill them.

When you shoot someone in the back, it's to stop them from getting away from you, and to kill them

The first one applies to "self defense" as in "if I didn't shoot him, he would have harmed me". The second applies if someone is going around posing a danger to everyone around - like the guy in Nova Scotia. You kill him as soon as you see him.

The cop's defense in this case will have to prove that he thought if he didn't kill the guy, he would have harmed someone else. He assumed that his intent on resisting arrest was so that he intended to get away so he could go hurt people, rather than what most people might suggest was to just not get touched by cops and go sleep off his drunkenness.

After 40 minutes of being completely compliant and reasonable, it might be hard for the cop to convince a jury that he thought Rayshard was going to imminently try to hurt people if the they didn't try arresting him then and there, and also that if he'd fled, that the only other option was to kill Rayshard, because otherwise he would have gone on to harm someone else instead of running away..

You don't kill someone as fucking punishment for getting away from your arrest attempt.
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-17-2020, 11:39 PM   #561
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
Manic!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 16,048
Thanked 7,403 Times in 3,475 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hehe View Post
I'm telling you that it's almost hypocritical to suggest something like that. You are analyzing a la keyboard warrior style AFTER the fact.

Police are trained and sworn to protect. And they are trained to shoot for the torso. It's the largest mass on our body. It was unfortunate that the suspect died from the injury, but what you are saying is that the police was shooting with the idea to kill the suspect. If he was shooting to kill, I think there'd be a lot more shots fired.

In a situation like that, the priority was to neutralize the threat. It was a person with a record, under influence, resisting arrest, armed (to a certain degree), and had the willingness to engage.

If the police didn't neutralize the perceived threat ATM while he still could, he wouldn't be doing his job.

Again... think about the alternate scenario I suggested, it's basically what you are asking, keep on following him... and if another bystander gets hurt because of this decision, who would you blame? Who would the public blame?

Yes I get the argument of "oh he didn't have deadly forces". But he clearly showed the willingness to hurt others in order to get what he wanted. When there is motive, having a weapon or not becomes irrelevant because the person himself is the weapon.
Who are they trying to protect? Just let the guy run and follow him. When he gets tired then beat him with batons and arrest him. The cops' ego got hurt and he shot him in the back. The gun should be the absolute last resort. Know ones life was at stake.

Situations like this (cop getting beaten up) happen all the time and no one dies.

https://www.cheknews.ca/rcmp-officer...-fight-382962/

https://www.nanaimobulletin.com/news...-traffic-stop/

https://www.nanaimobulletin.com/news...irate-suspect/
__________________
Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
Manic! is offline   Reply With Quote
This post FAILED by:
Old 06-17-2020, 11:43 PM   #562
Head of HR....have a seat on that couch
 
fliptuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 21,873
Thanked 15,587 Times in 4,319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manic! View Post
Aunt Jemima is changing its name and Uncle Bens is planning to do it also. It would have been great If Jemima was the one who created the product but Jemima is just the black mammy your mom used because she was too lazy to cook and clean.
Lmk when the Redskins change their name and the US changes the anthem.
__________________
feedback

Originally posted by v.b.
can we stop, my pussy hurts...
Originally posted by asian_XL
fliptuner, I am gonna grab ur dick and pee in your face, then rub shit all over my face...:lol
Originally posted by Fei-Ji
haha i can taste the cum in my mouth
Originally posted by FastAnna
when I was 13 I wanted to be a video hoe so bad


RSUV #7
fliptuner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2020, 12:01 AM   #563
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
Manic!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 16,048
Thanked 7,403 Times in 3,475 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by fliptuner View Post
Lmk when the Redskins change their name and the US changes the anthem.
Small steps. Land o lakes also changed their logo.
__________________
Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
Manic! is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-18-2020, 01:18 AM   #564
Performance Moderator
 
68style's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond
Posts: 15,495
Thanked 15,608 Times in 5,172 Posts
Kansas City Chiefs... Washington Redskins... Atlanta Braves... Chicago Blackhawks... their days are all numbered
68style is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-18-2020, 02:32 AM   #565
Banned (ABWS)?
 
AzNightmare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 19,169
Thanked 3,995 Times in 1,694 Posts
Sometimes I feel people forget police officers are humans too. Unless we start using AI for enforcing, it's never going to be a perfect scenario where just the perfect amount of force is used every single time.

It's easy in hindsight to point out he was only just running away. He ran out of "ammo" on his taser so whew, he missed, so the officers were completely safe after that. But this isn't a movie where cops are counting remaining shots in the heat of the moment. All the cop knows is this guy just stole a weapon, tried to attack, and is trying to escape, and now he needs to be put down immediately.

Police officers also have family they want to go back to at the end of the day. When someone grabs a weapon and then tries to use it to attack, those are some extreme lengths to be pulling on a cop. I really hate saying this, but "play stupid games and win stupid prizes." Once again I'll ask at what line can we draw when it's justified to take out the gun? Are officers expected to be sacrificial pawns just because it's "part of the job"? Like, there were two officers, let's hesitate and wait. If one officer gets taken out, then the 2nd officer will know to move onto the next step of enforcement accordingly...

Yes, in hindsight, it was only a taser. He wasn't going to kill anyone directly by tazing one officer, even if he was on target. But that's besides the point. It was a threat. It was very clear this man was willing to go to lengths to attack. If life ran at half speed, maybe every reactive scenario can be played out much better. But this happened all so fast.

We can sit here blaming the training and what not. Maybe it's true. Police need better training to address these situations more accurately. But at some point, I also feel "better training" really just means to hesitate and be willing to sacrifice getting severely injured or killed should they train to react more slowly even when things escalate.
__________________
__________________________________________________
Last edited by AzNightmare; Today at 10:09 AM
AzNightmare is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-18-2020, 04:02 AM   #566
Hacked RS to become a mod
 
SkinnyPupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sunny Hong Kong
Posts: 52,470
Thanked 23,845 Times in 8,207 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzNightmare View Post
is trying to escape, and now he needs to be put down immediately.
This is the part I disagree with. We're not talking about a bank robber here. Or even a drug dealer. We're dealing with a guy who was drunk driving, and passed out in a drive thru. A guy who was totally compliant and polite the whole time, for almost 40 minutes. He tried to get away (bad idea) but that doesn't mean "he needs to be put down". He wasn't even running from a warrant. You want to "put down" someone trying to duck a drunk driving charge?

I agree things go fast and cops are in a very dangerous line of work. That's why I emphasize that the training needs to be good, and the goal should be as social workers rather than going around trying to lock people up who aren't imminently endangering the world.
SkinnyPupp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2020, 07:06 AM   #567
SFICC-03*
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: richmond
Posts: 8,084
Thanked 2,470 Times in 995 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 68style View Post
Kansas City Chiefs... Washington Redskins... Atlanta Braves... Chicago Blackhawks... their days are all numbered
all sports teams with indian related names and logos right now:

unit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2020, 08:40 AM   #568
(╯°□°)╯聽不到 ╮(°□°╮)
 
Tim Budong's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Womb
Posts: 18,007
Thanked 11,200 Times in 2,279 Posts


My toothpaste is racist, i knew it, but I used this brand..and have been for a long time, colgate will rebrand this.. again..somehow...

https://hongkongfp.com/2020/06/18/ex...-matter-demos/
Tim Budong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2020, 10:22 AM   #569
RS.net, helping ugly ppl have sex since 2001
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Richmond
Posts: 8,424
Thanked 14,776 Times in 3,871 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by welfare View Post
Jesus Christ. You don't resist arrest,then take an officer's weapon away from him during a struggle, fire it at them, and expect the cops to play pattycake.
That's not a precedent anyone should want set.
Wtf world are people living in?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinnyPupp View Post
You just justified murder by assuming the only other option is "pattycake"...
Always makes me think of the quote from pulp fiction.

“ Antwan didn't expect Marsellus to react the way he did, but he had to expect a reaction.”

__________________
https://i.imgur.com/4PRtABe.gif
320icar is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-18-2020, 10:28 AM   #570
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
Manic!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 16,048
Thanked 7,403 Times in 3,475 Posts
......
__________________
Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
Manic! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2020, 10:54 AM   #571
I subscribe to the Fight Club ONLY
 
6793026's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BC, HK, USA
Posts: 7,353
Thanked 2,356 Times in 975 Posts
I don't blame the cop.
Why would someone run from being arrested AND steal a taser while running is something i can't comprehend.

When you run and then turn around firing something at someone, he/she (a cop in this case) would not have the mindset to distinguish "oh, he is firing at me with the taser he took 25 second ago". Training has always taught to protect yourself, we aren't playing a video game.

The cop's life is a life itself, he has to protect himself also. Who's to say the dude wasn't carrying and pulled out a gun while running.

There are LOTS of stupid situation when a black man answers the door with his remote control and mistaken it as a gun... shot and dies...

Fraction of a second judgment calls aren't always the best, but when its life and death... cop has the right to protect himself.
6793026 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2020, 11:06 AM   #572
To me, there is the Internet and there is RS
 
Manic!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Nanaimo
Posts: 16,048
Thanked 7,403 Times in 3,475 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 6793026 View Post
I don't blame the cop.
Why would someone run from being arrested AND steal a taser while running is something i can't comprehend.

When you run and then turn around firing something at someone, he/she (a cop in this case) would not have the mindset to distinguish "oh, he is firing at me with the taser he took 25 second ago". Training has always taught to protect yourself, we aren't playing a video game.

The cop's life is a life itself, he has to protect himself also. Who's to say the dude wasn't carrying and pulled out a gun while running.

There are LOTS of stupid situation when a black man answers the door with his remote control and mistaken it as a gun... shot and dies...

Fraction of a second judgment calls aren't always the best, but when its life and death... cop has the right to protect himself.
The guy was shot in the back.
__________________
Until the lions have their own historians, the history of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.
Manic! is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-18-2020, 12:25 PM   #573
Ebisu Boss
 
Obsideon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: West Side
Posts: 4,048
Thanked 1,889 Times in 705 Posts
I guess there's always 2 sides to an argument.

I'm all for BLM and it's just good/bad timing for this to happen but seriously, he was so drunk he passed out in the middle of the drive-thru, that in itself was enough to get arrested and car towed.
Then to resist arrest, grab an officers weapon and try to run. I can't defend that.
That 40minute calm and respectful conversation does give the benefit that that the police were not prejudiced towards him because of colour.

Would he have opened fire if it was an Asian in that situation? Who knows.
The cop had basically 1 in 50 chance to hit the heart, he was just aiming at the main part of the body.
Obsideon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2020, 12:27 PM   #574
I subscribe to the Fight Club ONLY
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 604
Posts: 7,325
Thanked 4,049 Times in 1,926 Posts
With this case, it should have NEVER gotten to the handcuff stage ... what the hell was that for? Officer should have offered the guy a ride to his sister's house to sleep off the booze. You gotta know when someone is worth handcuffing and arresting and when someone is not.
whitev70r is offline   Reply With Quote
This post thanked by:
Old 06-18-2020, 12:46 PM   #575
I am Hook'd on RS
 
birddog3k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 62
Thanked 23 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitev70r View Post
With this case, it should have NEVER gotten to the handcuff stage ... what the hell was that for? Officer should have offered the guy a ride to his sister's house to sleep off the booze. You gotta know when someone is worth handcuffing and arresting and when someone is not.
Can we trust that he would have stayed there? Does him having a previous DUI account for anything?
birddog3k is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Revscene.net cannot be held accountable for the actions of its members nor does the opinions of the members represent that of Revscene.net